3-Dimensional Evaluation of Two PNAM Techniques (Modified Grayson & AlignerNAM) on Facial Soft Tissue Morphology: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Alisha K. H., Puneet Batra, Achint Juneja, Aditya Talwar, Stuti Mohan, S. C. Sood
{"title":"3-Dimensional Evaluation of Two PNAM Techniques (Modified Grayson & AlignerNAM) on Facial Soft Tissue Morphology: A Randomised Clinical Trial","authors":"Alisha K. H., Puneet Batra, Achint Juneja, Aditya Talwar, Stuti Mohan, S. C. Sood","doi":"10.1177/10556656241246923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveEvaluate facial changes after Presurgical Naso-Alveolar Molding (PNAM) in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients treated with Modified Grayson Technique and AlignerNAM (with DynaCleft nasal elevator) using a 3D facial scan.DesignRandomised clinical trial.SettingInstitutional study. Participants: 20 UCLP patients allocated to two groups (10 patients each).InterventionsGroup A patients underwent PNAM with Modified Grayson Technique and Group B patients underwent AlignerNAM (with DynaCleft nasal elevator). Their 3D facial scans were obtained by using an iOSbased application (Bellus3D FaceApp) mounted on a novel frame. These .stl files were analysed using 3D software (GOM INSPECT) at three-time intervals; before intervention (T0), after intervention (T1) and one month after lip repair surgery (T2).Main Outcome Measure(s)Changes in facial and nasolabial morphology.ResultsBoth techniques brought significant improvement in the columellar length, nasal tip projection, columella angle, nasal tip angle and a significant reduction in cleft width. At T1, a statistically significant difference in angular and linear measurements was present in both groups. At T2, no statistically significant difference in linear parameters was observed between the two groups except for the outer lateral height of the non-cleft side, basal lateral height of the non-cleft side, and philtrum width. Similar pattern was observed in angular measurements with no statistically significant difference between the two groups except in nasolabial angle, anterior nasal base triangle III, and anterior nasal root triangle.ConclusionsAligner NAM and Modified Grayson technique are equally effective PNAM methods with similar clinical results in nasolabial morphology after lip repair surgery.","PeriodicalId":519225,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241246923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveEvaluate facial changes after Presurgical Naso-Alveolar Molding (PNAM) in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients treated with Modified Grayson Technique and AlignerNAM (with DynaCleft nasal elevator) using a 3D facial scan.DesignRandomised clinical trial.SettingInstitutional study. Participants: 20 UCLP patients allocated to two groups (10 patients each).InterventionsGroup A patients underwent PNAM with Modified Grayson Technique and Group B patients underwent AlignerNAM (with DynaCleft nasal elevator). Their 3D facial scans were obtained by using an iOSbased application (Bellus3D FaceApp) mounted on a novel frame. These .stl files were analysed using 3D software (GOM INSPECT) at three-time intervals; before intervention (T0), after intervention (T1) and one month after lip repair surgery (T2).Main Outcome Measure(s)Changes in facial and nasolabial morphology.ResultsBoth techniques brought significant improvement in the columellar length, nasal tip projection, columella angle, nasal tip angle and a significant reduction in cleft width. At T1, a statistically significant difference in angular and linear measurements was present in both groups. At T2, no statistically significant difference in linear parameters was observed between the two groups except for the outer lateral height of the non-cleft side, basal lateral height of the non-cleft side, and philtrum width. Similar pattern was observed in angular measurements with no statistically significant difference between the two groups except in nasolabial angle, anterior nasal base triangle III, and anterior nasal root triangle.ConclusionsAligner NAM and Modified Grayson technique are equally effective PNAM methods with similar clinical results in nasolabial morphology after lip repair surgery.
两种 PNAM 技术(改良格雷森和 AlignerNAM)对面部软组织形态的三维评估:随机临床试验
目的 使用三维面部扫描评估单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者在接受改良格雷森技术和 AlignerNAM(带 DynaCleft 鼻提升器)治疗的术前鼻腔-牙槽成型术(PNAM)后的面部变化。干预A组患者接受改良格雷森技术的 PNAM 治疗,B 组患者接受 AlignerNAM(带 DynaCleft 鼻提升器)治疗。他们的三维面部扫描是通过安装在新型框架上的基于 iOS 的应用程序(Bellus3D FaceApp)获得的。这些.stl 文件使用三维软件(GOM INSPECT)在干预前(T0)、干预后(T1)和唇修复手术后一个月(T2)三个时间间隔进行分析。结果两种技术都显著改善了小阴唇长度、鼻尖投影、小阴唇角度、鼻尖角度,并显著减少了唇裂宽度。在 T1 阶段,两组的角度和线性测量值均有显著的统计学差异。在 T2,除了非左侧的外侧高、非左侧的基底侧高和咽鼓管宽度外,两组的线性参数在统计学上没有明显差异。结论 Aligner NAM 和改良 Grayson 技术是同样有效的 PNAM 方法,对唇修复手术后的鼻唇形态具有相似的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信