Individual Maxim Tokens, not Abstract Maxim Types

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1017/s1369415424000219

Samuel Kahn

引用次数: 0

Abstract

I argue that Kant’s Categorical Imperative should be applied to individual maxim tokens rather than abstract maxim types. The article is divided into five sections. In the first, I explain my thesis. In the second, I show that my thesis disagrees with Rawls. In the third, I argue for my thesis on the basis of the wording of the Categorical Imperative and on the basis of considerations about autonomy. In the fourth, I argue for my thesis on the basis of considerations about the ‘ought implies can’ principle. In the fifth, I provide a summary of the main argumentative moves and also explain some of the philosophical advantages of my thesis.

查看原文本刊更多论文

单个马克西姆标记，而非抽象马克西姆类型

我认为，康德的 "绝对命令 "应适用于单个的格言标记，而不是抽象的格言类型。文章分为五个部分。在第一部分，我解释了我的论点。在第二部分，我说明我的论点与罗尔斯不一致。第三部分，我根据 "绝对命令 "的措辞和对自主性的考虑来论证我的论点。在第四部分，我基于对 "应当意味着能够 "原则的考虑来论证我的论点。在第五部分，我总结了主要的论证步骤，并解释了我的论题在哲学上的一些优势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.