Imaginary Empires: Women Writers and Alternative Futures in Early US Literature by Maria O'Malley (review)

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Lucas P. Kelley
{"title":"Imaginary Empires: Women Writers and Alternative Futures in Early US Literature by Maria O'Malley (review)","authors":"Lucas P. Kelley","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a925452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Imaginary Empires: Women Writers and Alternative Futures in Early US Literature</em> by Maria O’Malley <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Lucas P. Kelley </li> </ul> <em>Imaginary Empires: Women Writers and Alternative Futures in Early US Literature</em>. By Maria O’Malley. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2023. Pp. xii, 230. $45.00, ISBN 978-0-8071-7848-5.) <p>In <em>Imaginary Empires: Women Writers and Alternative Futures in Early US Literature</em>, Maria O’Malley analyzes five eighteenth-and nineteenth-century <strong>[End Page 413]</strong> literary works that reveal women’s engagement with the processes of empire in North America. The texts’ authors, notes O’Malley, all “assert an imagined world in an attempt to wrest power from the prerogatives of empire building to provide an imagined ontology of power for women as they escape patriarchal systems” (p. 15). More than simply creating an imaginary literary realm, these authors offered their own alternative future of the United States, or settler colonialism more generally, which allowed them to “reckon with the various power loci within empires and the ambivalent role of women who negotiate between their own subordinate position and sovereignty over others” (p. 3). O’Malley’s close reading of the five texts demonstrates how women’s engagement with empire-building varied based on historical context and their individual identity.</p> <p>The book’s first four chapters explore works of fiction. O’Malley begins by analyzing <em>The Female American</em>, published in 1767 by an unknown author. The text encouraged readers to imagine how English colonization might have taken place with women in charge through its story of a shipwrecked, mixed-race woman of English and Indigenous ancestry and her effort to convert Native people to Christianity. <em>The Female American</em>, notes O’Malley, “reterritorializes women’s role in empire building while simultaneously charting the fears women’s agency inspires” (p. 17). Fear is a common point of emphasis in scholarly interpretations of the Haitian Revolution. Yet in her analysis of Leonora Sansay’s <em>Secret History: or, The Horrors of St. Domingo</em> (1808) in chapter 2, O’Malley highlights the “rhetorical power” presented by Black revolutionaries as they articulated the possibilities of an independent Haiti as well as the “sexual power” that Black women employed to challenge French rule (pp. 53, 54). Chapter 3 returns to colonial America with its focus on Catharine Maria Sedgwick’s <em>Hope Leslie: A Tale of Massachusetts</em>, which chronicles how the settler household advanced English colonization through the text’s interpretation of conflict between New England Puritans and the region’s Indigenous inhabitants. O’Malley’s concept of alternate futures is especially evident here, for Sedgwick published <em>Hope Leslie</em> in 1827, a time when many Americans were debating Indian removal. Sedgwick, suggests O’Malley, was trying to “shape attitudes toward incorporating the experiences of indigenous peoples into the stories of American peoplehood” (p. 82). O’Malley makes a similar point in chapter 4 by demonstrating how Lydia Maria Child’s <em>Romance of the Republic</em> (1867) imagined a postwar United States where mixed-race people, joined through interracial marriage, could be the driving force of the nation’s future imperialism.</p> <p>Historians of the American South will be especially interested in O’Malley’s analysis of Harriet Jacobs’s <em>Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl</em> in the book’s final chapter. O’Malley makes the compelling point that <em>Incidents</em> should be recognized as a work of imagination, futurity, and empire. Jacobs conjures an imaginary Massachusetts to gain power over her enslaver, and in doing so, she also articulates a site of future perfection in the abolitionist North, an expectation that results in disillusionment once Jacobs begins making a life in New York and Boston. Moreover, argues O’Malley, Jacobs’s “representation of a divided United States troubles the notions of a coherent nation that aspires to imperial might” (p. 19). Most historians read <em>Incidents</em> to understand how gender influenced enslaved people’s experiences, but O’Malley demonstrates <strong>[End Page 414]</strong> how a literary analysis of the text results in fresh understandings, which should influence how historians teach and interpret Jacobs’s book. <em>Imaginary Empires</em> serves as a valuable reminder that historians should engage with literary criticism in order to better understand the historical actors that are...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Imaginary Empires: Women Writers and Alternative Futures in Early US Literature by Maria O’Malley
  • Lucas P. Kelley
Imaginary Empires: Women Writers and Alternative Futures in Early US Literature. By Maria O’Malley. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2023. Pp. xii, 230. $45.00, ISBN 978-0-8071-7848-5.)

In Imaginary Empires: Women Writers and Alternative Futures in Early US Literature, Maria O’Malley analyzes five eighteenth-and nineteenth-century [End Page 413] literary works that reveal women’s engagement with the processes of empire in North America. The texts’ authors, notes O’Malley, all “assert an imagined world in an attempt to wrest power from the prerogatives of empire building to provide an imagined ontology of power for women as they escape patriarchal systems” (p. 15). More than simply creating an imaginary literary realm, these authors offered their own alternative future of the United States, or settler colonialism more generally, which allowed them to “reckon with the various power loci within empires and the ambivalent role of women who negotiate between their own subordinate position and sovereignty over others” (p. 3). O’Malley’s close reading of the five texts demonstrates how women’s engagement with empire-building varied based on historical context and their individual identity.

The book’s first four chapters explore works of fiction. O’Malley begins by analyzing The Female American, published in 1767 by an unknown author. The text encouraged readers to imagine how English colonization might have taken place with women in charge through its story of a shipwrecked, mixed-race woman of English and Indigenous ancestry and her effort to convert Native people to Christianity. The Female American, notes O’Malley, “reterritorializes women’s role in empire building while simultaneously charting the fears women’s agency inspires” (p. 17). Fear is a common point of emphasis in scholarly interpretations of the Haitian Revolution. Yet in her analysis of Leonora Sansay’s Secret History: or, The Horrors of St. Domingo (1808) in chapter 2, O’Malley highlights the “rhetorical power” presented by Black revolutionaries as they articulated the possibilities of an independent Haiti as well as the “sexual power” that Black women employed to challenge French rule (pp. 53, 54). Chapter 3 returns to colonial America with its focus on Catharine Maria Sedgwick’s Hope Leslie: A Tale of Massachusetts, which chronicles how the settler household advanced English colonization through the text’s interpretation of conflict between New England Puritans and the region’s Indigenous inhabitants. O’Malley’s concept of alternate futures is especially evident here, for Sedgwick published Hope Leslie in 1827, a time when many Americans were debating Indian removal. Sedgwick, suggests O’Malley, was trying to “shape attitudes toward incorporating the experiences of indigenous peoples into the stories of American peoplehood” (p. 82). O’Malley makes a similar point in chapter 4 by demonstrating how Lydia Maria Child’s Romance of the Republic (1867) imagined a postwar United States where mixed-race people, joined through interracial marriage, could be the driving force of the nation’s future imperialism.

Historians of the American South will be especially interested in O’Malley’s analysis of Harriet Jacobs’s Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl in the book’s final chapter. O’Malley makes the compelling point that Incidents should be recognized as a work of imagination, futurity, and empire. Jacobs conjures an imaginary Massachusetts to gain power over her enslaver, and in doing so, she also articulates a site of future perfection in the abolitionist North, an expectation that results in disillusionment once Jacobs begins making a life in New York and Boston. Moreover, argues O’Malley, Jacobs’s “representation of a divided United States troubles the notions of a coherent nation that aspires to imperial might” (p. 19). Most historians read Incidents to understand how gender influenced enslaved people’s experiences, but O’Malley demonstrates [End Page 414] how a literary analysis of the text results in fresh understandings, which should influence how historians teach and interpret Jacobs’s book. Imaginary Empires serves as a valuable reminder that historians should engage with literary criticism in order to better understand the historical actors that are...

想象中的帝国:美国早期文学中的女作家和另类未来》,作者 Maria O'Malley(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 想象中的帝国:Maria O'Malley Lucas P. Kelley Imaginary Empires:早期美国文学中的女作家和另类未来》。作者:玛丽亚-奥马利。(巴吞鲁日:路易斯安那州立大学出版社,2023 年。Pp.45.00美元,ISBN 978-0-8071-7848-5)。想象中的帝国》(In Imaginary Empires:Maria O'Malley 分析了五部十八和十九世纪 [尾页 413]的文学作品,这些作品揭示了女性参与北美帝国进程的情况。O'Malley 指出,这些作品的作者都 "坚持一个想象中的世界,试图从帝国建设的特权中夺取权力,为女性提供一个想象中的权力本体,因为她们摆脱了父权制"(第 15 页)。这些作家不仅创造了一个想象中的文学领域,还为美国或更广泛的殖民定居主义提供了自己的另一种未来,这使他们能够 "思考帝国内部的各种权力定位,以及女性在自己的从属地位和对他人的主权之间的矛盾角色"(第 3 页)。O'Malley 通过对五篇文本的细读,展示了女性如何根据历史背景和个人身份参与帝国建设。本书的前四章探讨了小说作品。O'Malley 首先分析了《美国女性》,该书出版于 1767 年,作者不详。该书通过讲述一位遭遇海难的英国和土著混血女性以及她努力让土著人皈依基督教的故事,鼓励读者想象英国殖民统治是如何在女性掌权的情况下进行的。奥马利指出,《美国女性》"将女性在帝国建设中的角色重新领土化,同时描绘了女性机构所激发的恐惧"(第 17 页)。恐惧是学术界解读海地革命的一个共同重点。然而,在第 2 章对 Leonora Sansay 的《秘史:或圣多明各的恐怖》(1808 年)的分析中,O'Malley 强调了黑人革命者在阐述海地独立的可能性时所展现的 "修辞力量",以及黑人妇女用来挑战法国统治的 "性力量"(第 53 和 54 页)。第 3 章回到美国殖民时期,重点关注凯瑟琳-玛丽亚-塞奇威克(Catharine Maria Sedgwick)的《希望-莱斯利:马萨诸塞州的故事》(Hope Leslie: A Tale of Massachusetts),该书通过对新英格兰清教徒与该地区土著居民之间冲突的解读,记录了定居者家庭如何推进英国殖民化。奥马利的 "另一种未来 "概念在此体现得尤为明显,因为塞奇威克出版《希望-莱斯利》的时间是 1827 年,当时许多美国人正在争论印第安人的迁移问题。O'Malley 认为,塞奇威克试图 "塑造一种态度,将原住民的经历融入美国人的故事中"(第 82 页)。奥马利在第 4 章中提出了类似的观点,他展示了莉迪亚-玛丽亚-柴尔德(Lydia Maria Child)的《共和国罗曼史》(Romance of the Republic,1867 年)如何想象战后的美国,在那里,通过异族通婚而结合在一起的混血儿可能成为国家未来帝国主义的推动力。奥马利在本书最后一章对哈丽雅特-雅各布斯(Harriet Jacobs)的《女奴生活中的事件》(Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl)进行了分析,美国南方历史学家对此会特别感兴趣。奥马利提出了一个令人信服的观点,即《事件》应被视为一部关于想象力、未来性和帝国的作品。雅各布斯创造了一个想象中的马萨诸塞州,以获得对奴役她的人的权力,同时,她也在废奴主义的北方阐述了一个未来完美的地方,但当雅各布斯在纽约和波士顿开始生活时,这种期望却幻灭了。此外,奥马利认为,雅各布斯 "对一个分裂的美国的描述,对一个向往帝国强权的统一国家的概念提出了质疑"(第 19 页)。大多数历史学家阅读《事件》是为了了解性别是如何影响被奴役者的经历的,但奥马利展示了 [完 414 页] 对文本的文学分析是如何产生新的理解的,这应该影响历史学家如何教授和解读雅各布斯的著作。想象中的帝国》是一个有价值的提醒,提醒历史学家应该参与文学批评,以便更好地理解历史行为者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信