Association between dietary inflammation index and inflammatory bowel disease in adults: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2010

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Jing-yi Zhu, Xiao-ru Sun, Mu-yun Liu, Chang Sun
{"title":"Association between dietary inflammation index and inflammatory bowel disease in adults: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2010","authors":"Jing-yi Zhu,&nbsp;Xiao-ru Sun,&nbsp;Mu-yun Liu,&nbsp;Chang Sun","doi":"10.1111/1440-1681.13859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous study has demonstrated that the Dietary Inflammation Index (DII) played a role in the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), however, the prevalence and risk factors for IBD are distinct across locations and groups, and therefore, the findings are debatable and warrant further investigation. A total of 4363 participants were calculated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009 to 2010, of whom 1.21% self-reported a history of IBD. DII values were performed as a good predictor of dietary inflammation based on data from two 24-h dietary reviews in the NHANES database. Comparing the multifarious effects along with variations of the whole population by grouping populations according to DII quartiles, dietary inflammation levels increased progressively from DII quartile 1(Q1) to quartile 4(Q4). The association between DII and IBD was tested with multi-variable logistic regression models, subgroup analyses and weighted generalized additive models. Participants in the Q4 group showed the highest levels of C-reactive protein and reduced haemoglobin and albumin levels. Logistic regression confirmed the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of IBD for DII were 0.99 (0.86, 1.15), 0.97 (0.84, 1.13) and 0.80 (0.66, 0.98) in models 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The negative correlation between DII and IBD among United States adults from the NHANES database became increasingly apparent as covariates were adjusted. Subgroup analyses and smoothed curve fitting confirmed the inverse results. The study revealed that DII was correlated with the overall physical well-being of participants. However, there was no significant association between DII and IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1681.13859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous study has demonstrated that the Dietary Inflammation Index (DII) played a role in the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), however, the prevalence and risk factors for IBD are distinct across locations and groups, and therefore, the findings are debatable and warrant further investigation. A total of 4363 participants were calculated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009 to 2010, of whom 1.21% self-reported a history of IBD. DII values were performed as a good predictor of dietary inflammation based on data from two 24-h dietary reviews in the NHANES database. Comparing the multifarious effects along with variations of the whole population by grouping populations according to DII quartiles, dietary inflammation levels increased progressively from DII quartile 1(Q1) to quartile 4(Q4). The association between DII and IBD was tested with multi-variable logistic regression models, subgroup analyses and weighted generalized additive models. Participants in the Q4 group showed the highest levels of C-reactive protein and reduced haemoglobin and albumin levels. Logistic regression confirmed the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of IBD for DII were 0.99 (0.86, 1.15), 0.97 (0.84, 1.13) and 0.80 (0.66, 0.98) in models 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The negative correlation between DII and IBD among United States adults from the NHANES database became increasingly apparent as covariates were adjusted. Subgroup analyses and smoothed curve fitting confirmed the inverse results. The study revealed that DII was correlated with the overall physical well-being of participants. However, there was no significant association between DII and IBD.

成人膳食炎症指数与炎症性肠病之间的关系:2009-2010 年全国健康与营养调查的结果
以往的研究表明,膳食炎症指数(DII)在炎症性肠病(IBD)的发病风险中起着一定的作用,然而,IBD的发病率和风险因素在不同地区和不同人群中是不同的,因此,研究结果值得商榷,也值得进一步研究。2009 年至 2010 年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)共统计了 4363 名参与者,其中 1.21% 的人自述有 IBD 病史。根据 NHANES 数据库中两次 24 小时膳食回顾的数据,DII 值可作为膳食炎症的良好预测指标。根据 DII 四分位数对整个人群进行分组,比较其多种影响和变化,发现膳食炎症水平从 DII 四分位数 1(Q1)到四分位数 4(Q4)逐渐升高。通过多变量逻辑回归模型、亚组分析和加权广义相加模型检验了 DII 与 IBD 之间的关系。Q4 组的参与者 C 反应蛋白水平最高,血红蛋白和白蛋白水平降低。逻辑回归证实,在模型 1、2 和 3 中,DII 与 IBD 的几率比(95% 置信区间)分别为 0.99(0.86,1.15)、0.97(0.84,1.13)和 0.80(0.66,0.98)。随着协变量的调整,NHANES 数据库中美国成年人的 DII 与 IBD 之间的负相关性越来越明显。亚组分析和平滑曲线拟合证实了反向结果。研究显示,DII 与参与者的总体身体健康水平相关。但是,DII 与肠道疾病之间没有明显的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology is an international journal founded in 1974 by Mike Rand, Austin Doyle, John Coghlan and Paul Korner. Our focus is new frontiers in physiology and pharmacology, emphasizing the translation of basic research to clinical practice. We publish original articles, invited reviews and our exciting, cutting-edge Frontiers-in-Research series’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信