A unified approach to measuring unequal representation

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Junichiro Wada, Yuta Kamahara
{"title":"A unified approach to measuring unequal representation","authors":"Junichiro Wada, Yuta Kamahara","doi":"10.1007/s11127-024-01159-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of unequal representation is commonly understood through the lenses of <i>disproportionality</i> and <i>malapportionment</i>, pertaining to <i>inter-party</i> and <i>inter-district</i> aspects, respectively. Popular indices used to measure such features are analyzed separately despite being mathematically identical. District-level <i>wasted votes</i> are not measured in terms of unequal representation, even though they can be conceptualized as <i>intra-district unequal representation</i>. A new component, <i>intra-party unequal representation</i>, which measures unequal representation across districts for voters who support each party, has not been considered to contribute to unequal representation. We propose a unified approach for measuring these components—disproportionality, malapportionment, wasted votes, and intra-party unequal representation—by using <span>\\({\\alpha }\\)</span>-divergence. We show mathematically that the total of disproportionality and intra-party unequal representation equals that of malapportionment and wasted votes. We apply this approach to the Japanese political system and demonstrate the role of intra-party unequal representation in sustaining disproportionality in favor of the Liberal Democratic Party.</p>","PeriodicalId":48322,"journal":{"name":"Public Choice","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Choice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-024-01159-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of unequal representation is commonly understood through the lenses of disproportionality and malapportionment, pertaining to inter-party and inter-district aspects, respectively. Popular indices used to measure such features are analyzed separately despite being mathematically identical. District-level wasted votes are not measured in terms of unequal representation, even though they can be conceptualized as intra-district unequal representation. A new component, intra-party unequal representation, which measures unequal representation across districts for voters who support each party, has not been considered to contribute to unequal representation. We propose a unified approach for measuring these components—disproportionality, malapportionment, wasted votes, and intra-party unequal representation—by using \({\alpha }\)-divergence. We show mathematically that the total of disproportionality and intra-party unequal representation equals that of malapportionment and wasted votes. We apply this approach to the Japanese political system and demonstrate the role of intra-party unequal representation in sustaining disproportionality in favor of the Liberal Democratic Party.

Abstract Image

衡量不平等代表权的统一方法
不平等代表权的概念通常从比例失调和比例不当这两个角度来理解,它们分别涉及政党间和地区间的问题。用于衡量这些特征的流行指数尽管在数学上是相同的,但却被分开分析。选区层面的浪费选票虽然可以概念化为选区内的不平等代表权,但并不是以不平等代表权来衡量的。党内不平等代表制是一个新的组成部分,用于衡量支持各政党的选民在各选区的不平等代表制,但尚未被认为会导致不平等代表制。我们提出了一种统一的方法,通过使用 \({\alpha }\)-divergence 来衡量这些组成部分--比例失调、分配不当、浪费选票和党内不平等代表。我们用数学方法证明,比例失调和党内不平等代表权的总和等于比例失调和浪费选票的总和。我们将这一方法应用于日本的政治体制,并证明了党内不平等代表制在维持有利于自民党的比例失调中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Choice
Public Choice Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Public Choice deals with the intersection between economics and political science. The journal was founded at a time when economists and political scientists became interested in the application of essentially economic methods to problems normally dealt with by political scientists. It has always retained strong traces of economic methodology, but new and fruitful techniques have been developed which are not recognizable by economists. Public Choice therefore remains central in its chosen role of introducing the two groups to each other, and allowing them to explain themselves through the medium of its pages. Officially cited as: Public Choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信