Evaluating the Reach of a Patient Navigation Program for Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Large Federally Qualified Health Center

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Priyanka Gautom, A. Gabriela Rosales, Amanda F. Petrik, Jamie H. Thompson, Matthew T. Slaughter, Leslie Mosso, Syed Akmal. Hussain, Ricardo Jimenez, Gloria D. Coronado
{"title":"Evaluating the Reach of a Patient Navigation Program for Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Large Federally Qualified Health Center","authors":"Priyanka Gautom, A. Gabriela Rosales, Amanda F. Petrik, Jamie H. Thompson, Matthew T. Slaughter, Leslie Mosso, Syed Akmal. Hussain, Ricardo Jimenez, Gloria D. Coronado","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient navigation (PN) has been shown to improve participation in cancer screening, including colorectal cancer screening, and the Community Preventive Services Task Force now recommends the practice. Despite the effectiveness of PN programs, little is known about the number of contacts needed to successfully reach patients or about the demographic and healthcare utilization factors associated with reach. PRECISE was an individual randomized study of PN vs. usual care conducted as a partnership between two large health systems in the Pacific Northwest. The navigation program was a six topic-area telephonic program designed to support patients with an abnormal fecal test result to obtain a follow-up colonoscopy. We report the number of contact attempts needed to successfully reach navigated patients. We used logistic regression to report the demographic and healthcare utilization characteristics associated with patients allocated to PN who were successfully reached. We identified 1200 patients with an abnormal FIT result, among whom 970 were randomized into the study (45.7% were female, 17.5% were Spanish-speaking, mean age was 60.8). Of the 479 patients allocated to the PN intervention, 382 (79.7%) were reached within 18 call attempts and nearly all (n = 356; 93.2%) were reached within six contact attempts. Patient characteristics associated with reach were race, county of residence, and body mass index. Our findings can guide future efforts to optimize the reach of PN programs.","PeriodicalId":9373,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Prevention Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Prevention Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient navigation (PN) has been shown to improve participation in cancer screening, including colorectal cancer screening, and the Community Preventive Services Task Force now recommends the practice. Despite the effectiveness of PN programs, little is known about the number of contacts needed to successfully reach patients or about the demographic and healthcare utilization factors associated with reach. PRECISE was an individual randomized study of PN vs. usual care conducted as a partnership between two large health systems in the Pacific Northwest. The navigation program was a six topic-area telephonic program designed to support patients with an abnormal fecal test result to obtain a follow-up colonoscopy. We report the number of contact attempts needed to successfully reach navigated patients. We used logistic regression to report the demographic and healthcare utilization characteristics associated with patients allocated to PN who were successfully reached. We identified 1200 patients with an abnormal FIT result, among whom 970 were randomized into the study (45.7% were female, 17.5% were Spanish-speaking, mean age was 60.8). Of the 479 patients allocated to the PN intervention, 382 (79.7%) were reached within 18 call attempts and nearly all (n = 356; 93.2%) were reached within six contact attempts. Patient characteristics associated with reach were race, county of residence, and body mass index. Our findings can guide future efforts to optimize the reach of PN programs.
评估大型联邦合格医疗中心结肠镜检查随访患者导航计划的覆盖范围
患者指导(PN)已被证明可提高癌症筛查(包括结直肠癌筛查)的参与率,社区预防服务工作组现在也推荐这种做法。尽管患者指导项目很有效,但人们对成功接触患者所需的接触次数或与接触患者相关的人口统计学和医疗保健利用率因素知之甚少。PRECISE 是西北太平洋地区两家大型医疗系统合作开展的一项关于 PN 与常规护理的个人随机研究。该导航计划是一项六个主题区域的电话计划,旨在帮助粪便检查结果异常的患者获得后续结肠镜检查。我们报告了成功联系导航患者所需的联系次数。我们使用逻辑回归法报告了被分配到 PN 并成功联系到的患者的相关人口统计学特征和医疗保健使用特征。我们确定了 1200 名 FIT 结果异常的患者,其中 970 人被随机纳入研究(45.7% 为女性,17.5% 讲西班牙语,平均年龄为 60.8 岁)。在被分配到 PN 干预的 479 名患者中,有 382 人(79.7%)在 18 次呼叫尝试内被联系到,几乎所有患者(n = 356;93.2%)都在 6 次呼叫尝试内被联系到。与联系成功率相关的患者特征包括种族、居住地和体重指数。我们的研究结果可以指导未来优化 PN 项目覆盖范围的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Prevention Research publishes original studies, reviews, and perspectives in the field of cancer prevention. Its scope includes the molecular and cellular biology of premalignancy and early lesions; genetic and environmental risk factors; risk assessment and reduction; early detection research (cancer screening and diagnosis); and preventive interventions (chemoprevention, immunoprevention, and others) to intercept cancer development at early stages prior to initiation, promotion, or progression. The journal comprises preclinical, clinical, and translational research, with special attention given to molecular discoveries and an emphasis on building a translational bridge between the basic and clinical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信