Out with the old: Single center experience with transvenous extraction of leads older than 15 years

Francis Phan, Saket Sanghai, Uday Sandhu, Chris Verdick, Angela Krebsbach, Castigliano M. Bhamidipati, Frederick A. Tibayan, Peter Jessel, Charles A. Henrikson
{"title":"Out with the old: Single center experience with transvenous extraction of leads older than 15 years","authors":"Francis Phan, Saket Sanghai, Uday Sandhu, Chris Verdick, Angela Krebsbach, Castigliano M. Bhamidipati, Frederick A. Tibayan, Peter Jessel, Charles A. Henrikson","doi":"10.1111/pace.14989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundLead dwell time is the single strongest predictor of failure and complications in transvenous lead extraction.ObjectivesTo report the success rate and complications of transvenous lead extractions with implant dwell time of at least 15 years.MethodsProcedural and patient data were prospectively collected into a database. The excimer laser was the primary method for lead extraction with the use of mechanical rotational sheaths and femoral snares at operator discretion.ResultsA total of 442 patients between 2011 and 2020 underwent lead extraction (705 leads) primarily for infection or device failure at our high‐volume center. Forty‐one patients with 71 leads &gt; 15 years old were included in this cohort. Mean patient age was 53.5 ± 18.5 years, 67.5% were male. Mean lead dwell time was 19.6 ± 4.4 years. Thirty‐six of 41 (88%) patients had successful extraction of all leads compared to 96% in the remaining 401 patients, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> value.004. Of the five patients without fully successful extractions two of these patients had abandoned leads (three total) that were clinically significant. There were two (4.9%) major complications in the very old lead group and six (1.5%) in the other group. In the very old lead group, one patient experienced right atrial appendage perforation requiring surgical repair and recovered well. One patient experienced new complete heart block requiring 2 min of CPR but did well thereafter. There was no procedure‐related mortality.ConclusionsDespite challenges posed by older leads, very old leads can be safely and effectively extracted with low complication rates.","PeriodicalId":19650,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundLead dwell time is the single strongest predictor of failure and complications in transvenous lead extraction.ObjectivesTo report the success rate and complications of transvenous lead extractions with implant dwell time of at least 15 years.MethodsProcedural and patient data were prospectively collected into a database. The excimer laser was the primary method for lead extraction with the use of mechanical rotational sheaths and femoral snares at operator discretion.ResultsA total of 442 patients between 2011 and 2020 underwent lead extraction (705 leads) primarily for infection or device failure at our high‐volume center. Forty‐one patients with 71 leads > 15 years old were included in this cohort. Mean patient age was 53.5 ± 18.5 years, 67.5% were male. Mean lead dwell time was 19.6 ± 4.4 years. Thirty‐six of 41 (88%) patients had successful extraction of all leads compared to 96% in the remaining 401 patients, p value.004. Of the five patients without fully successful extractions two of these patients had abandoned leads (three total) that were clinically significant. There were two (4.9%) major complications in the very old lead group and six (1.5%) in the other group. In the very old lead group, one patient experienced right atrial appendage perforation requiring surgical repair and recovered well. One patient experienced new complete heart block requiring 2 min of CPR but did well thereafter. There was no procedure‐related mortality.ConclusionsDespite challenges posed by older leads, very old leads can be safely and effectively extracted with low complication rates.
淘汰旧导线经静脉取出 15 年以上导联的单中心经验
背景导联驻留时间是经静脉导联取出失败和并发症的唯一最有力的预测因素。目的报告植入导联驻留时间至少15年的经静脉导联取出的成功率和并发症。结果2011年至2020年间,共有442名患者接受了导联取出术(705条导联),主要原因是感染或设备故障。其中41例患者的71条导联年龄超过15岁。患者平均年龄为 53.5 ± 18.5 岁,67.5% 为男性。平均导联停留时间为(19.6 ± 4.4)年。41 名患者中有 36 名(88%)成功拔出了所有导联,而其余 401 名患者的成功率为 96%,P 值为 004。在没有完全成功提取导联的五名患者中,有两名患者(共三人)放弃了有临床意义的导联。极老导联组有两例(4.9%)重大并发症,另一组有六例(1.5%)。在极老导联组中,一名患者出现右心房阑尾穿孔,需要手术修补,但恢复良好。一名患者出现了新的完全性心脏传导阻滞,需要进行 2 分钟的心肺复苏,但之后恢复良好。结论尽管老旧导联带来了挑战,但可以安全有效地提取老旧导联,并发症发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信