How False Memory and True Memory Affect Decision-Making in Older Adults: A Dissociative Account

Jianqin Wang, Angela Gutchess
{"title":"How False Memory and True Memory Affect Decision-Making in Older Adults: A Dissociative Account","authors":"Jianqin Wang, Angela Gutchess","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Remembering past rewarding experiences plays a crucial rule in guiding people’s decision-making in the future. However, as people age, they become less accurate in remembering past events and more susceptible to forming false memories. An important question is how the decline of episodic memory and increase of false memory may impact older adults’ decision-making performance. Method The current study used a newly developed paradigm in which the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false memory paradigm was combined with a reward learning task to create robust false memories of rewarding experiences. Participants learned that some DRM picture lists brought them a monetary reward and some DRM picture lists did not bring reward. Later, their memories were tested and decision-making preferences were measured. Results We found that older and younger adults had almost equivalent false and true memories under the rewarding context, but older adults showed significantly lower decision-making preferences for lure pictures and rewarded pictures than younger adults. Furthermore, true and false memories were a stronger predictor of decision-making preferences for younger than for older adults. Discussion These results together suggest an age-related dissociation between memory and decision-making that older adults may be less efficient in using their memory to guide decision-making than younger adults. Future research may further investigate its underlying mechanisms and develop potential interventions aiming at strengthening the connection between memory and decision-making in older adults to help improve their decision-making performance.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Remembering past rewarding experiences plays a crucial rule in guiding people’s decision-making in the future. However, as people age, they become less accurate in remembering past events and more susceptible to forming false memories. An important question is how the decline of episodic memory and increase of false memory may impact older adults’ decision-making performance. Method The current study used a newly developed paradigm in which the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false memory paradigm was combined with a reward learning task to create robust false memories of rewarding experiences. Participants learned that some DRM picture lists brought them a monetary reward and some DRM picture lists did not bring reward. Later, their memories were tested and decision-making preferences were measured. Results We found that older and younger adults had almost equivalent false and true memories under the rewarding context, but older adults showed significantly lower decision-making preferences for lure pictures and rewarded pictures than younger adults. Furthermore, true and false memories were a stronger predictor of decision-making preferences for younger than for older adults. Discussion These results together suggest an age-related dissociation between memory and decision-making that older adults may be less efficient in using their memory to guide decision-making than younger adults. Future research may further investigate its underlying mechanisms and develop potential interventions aiming at strengthening the connection between memory and decision-making in older adults to help improve their decision-making performance.
虚假记忆和真实记忆如何影响老年人的决策?分离论
目标 记住过去的有益经历对指导人们未来的决策起着至关重要的作用。然而,随着年龄的增长,人们对过去事件记忆的准确性越来越低,而且更容易形成错误记忆。一个重要的问题是,外显记忆的衰退和错误记忆的增加会如何影响老年人的决策表现。研究方法 本研究采用了一种新开发的范式,将 Deese-Roediger-McDermott 虚假记忆范式与奖励学习任务相结合,以产生对奖励经历的强烈虚假记忆。受试者了解到有些 DRM 图片列表会给他们带来金钱奖励,而有些 DRM 图片列表则不会带来奖励。随后,对他们的记忆进行测试,并对决策偏好进行测量。结果 我们发现,在奖励情境下,老年人和年轻人的虚假记忆和真实记忆几乎相同,但老年人对引诱图片和奖励图片的决策偏好明显低于年轻人。此外,真假记忆对年轻人决策偏好的预测作用要强于老年人。讨论 这些结果共同表明,记忆与决策之间存在着与年龄相关的分离,即老年人利用记忆指导决策的效率可能低于年轻人。未来的研究可以进一步探究其潜在机制,并开发潜在的干预措施,旨在加强老年人记忆与决策之间的联系,帮助他们提高决策绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信