A multi-criteria aware integrated decision making routing protocol for IoT communication toward 6G networks

IF 2.1 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Valmik Tilwari, Taewon Song, Usha Nandini, V. Sivasankaran, Sangheon Pack
{"title":"A multi-criteria aware integrated decision making routing protocol for IoT communication toward 6G networks","authors":"Valmik Tilwari, Taewon Song, Usha Nandini, V. Sivasankaran, Sangheon Pack","doi":"10.1007/s11276-024-03739-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Energy resource limitations, data packet traffic congestion, mobility, and communication link failure of relay nodes are vital challenges in establishing a reliable and efficient path between end-to-end users in IoT Communication toward 6G. These factors can severely affect routing and network performance. Hence, it is imperative to design a routing approach to adapt to such heterogeneity to improve the quality of service (QoS) performance toward 6G networks. This paper proposes a multi-criteria-aware integrated decision-making (MCAIDeM) routing protocol in which relay nodes’ residual energy, queue length, mobility, and link quality are integrated into a single routing approach for efficient and reliable route selection. In particular, the MCAIDeM routing protocol utilizes an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach for multi-criteria decision-making, which determines appropriate weights according to the parameter values of the nodes to select suitable relay nodes during the route selection process. Extensive simulations are performed to evaluate the performance, and the obtained simulation results showed that the proposed MCAIDeM routing protocol outperforms conventional routing protocols in terms of network throughput, latency, and energy consumption with various network parameters. The end-to-end delay obtained by MCAIDeM was 9.03% and 11.26% lower than that of MBMQA, 11.21%, and 13.67% lower than that of MEQSA-OLSRv2, and 19.15% and 16.61% lower than that of the MP-OLSRv2 routing protocols when the node speed increased from 5 m/s to 30 m/s, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":23750,"journal":{"name":"Wireless Networks","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wireless Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-024-03739-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy resource limitations, data packet traffic congestion, mobility, and communication link failure of relay nodes are vital challenges in establishing a reliable and efficient path between end-to-end users in IoT Communication toward 6G. These factors can severely affect routing and network performance. Hence, it is imperative to design a routing approach to adapt to such heterogeneity to improve the quality of service (QoS) performance toward 6G networks. This paper proposes a multi-criteria-aware integrated decision-making (MCAIDeM) routing protocol in which relay nodes’ residual energy, queue length, mobility, and link quality are integrated into a single routing approach for efficient and reliable route selection. In particular, the MCAIDeM routing protocol utilizes an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach for multi-criteria decision-making, which determines appropriate weights according to the parameter values of the nodes to select suitable relay nodes during the route selection process. Extensive simulations are performed to evaluate the performance, and the obtained simulation results showed that the proposed MCAIDeM routing protocol outperforms conventional routing protocols in terms of network throughput, latency, and energy consumption with various network parameters. The end-to-end delay obtained by MCAIDeM was 9.03% and 11.26% lower than that of MBMQA, 11.21%, and 13.67% lower than that of MEQSA-OLSRv2, and 19.15% and 16.61% lower than that of the MP-OLSRv2 routing protocols when the node speed increased from 5 m/s to 30 m/s, respectively.

Abstract Image

面向 6G 网络的物联网通信多标准感知综合决策路由协议
在面向 6G 的物联网通信中,能源资源限制、数据包流量拥塞、移动性和中继节点的通信链路故障是在端到端用户之间建立可靠高效路径的重要挑战。这些因素会严重影响路由和网络性能。因此,当务之急是设计一种适应这种异质性的路由方法,以提高面向 6G 网络的服务质量(QoS)性能。本文提出了一种多标准感知综合决策(MCAIDeM)路由协议,将中继节点的剩余能量、队列长度、移动性和链路质量整合到单一路由方法中,以实现高效可靠的路由选择。特别是,MCAIDeM 路由协议利用分析层次过程(AHP)方法进行多标准决策,根据节点的参数值确定适当的权重,从而在路由选择过程中选择合适的中继节点。仿真结果表明,MCAIDeM 路由协议在不同网络参数下的网络吞吐量、延迟和能耗方面均优于传统路由协议。当节点速度从5 m/s增加到30 m/s时,MCAIDeM获得的端到端延迟分别比MBMQA低9.03%和11.26%,比MEQSA-OLSRv2低11.21%和13.67%,比MP-OLSRv2路由协议低19.15%和16.61%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wireless Networks
Wireless Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: The wireless communication revolution is bringing fundamental changes to data networking, telecommunication, and is making integrated networks a reality. By freeing the user from the cord, personal communications networks, wireless LAN''s, mobile radio networks and cellular systems, harbor the promise of fully distributed mobile computing and communications, any time, anywhere. Focusing on the networking and user aspects of the field, Wireless Networks provides a global forum for archival value contributions documenting these fast growing areas of interest. The journal publishes refereed articles dealing with research, experience and management issues of wireless networks. Its aim is to allow the reader to benefit from experience, problems and solutions described.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信