Explainable Authorship Identification in Cultural Heritage Applications

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Mattia Setzu, Silvia Corbara, Anna Monreale, Alejandro Moreo, Fabrizio Sebastiani
{"title":"Explainable Authorship Identification in Cultural Heritage Applications","authors":"Mattia Setzu, Silvia Corbara, Anna Monreale, Alejandro Moreo, Fabrizio Sebastiani","doi":"10.1145/3654675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While a substantial amount of work has recently been devoted to improving the accuracy of computational Authorship Identification (AId) systems for textual data, little to no attention has been paid to endowing AId systems with the ability to explain the reasons behind their predictions. This substantially hinders the practical application of AId methods, since the predictions returned by such systems are hardly useful unless they are supported by suitable explanations. In this paper, we explore the applicability of existing general-purpose eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to AId, with a focus on explanations addressed to scholars working in cultural heritage. In particular, we assess the relative merits of three different types of XAI techniques (feature ranking, probing, factual and counterfactual selection) on three different AId tasks (authorship attribution, authorship verification, same-authorship verification) by running experiments on real AId textual data. Our analysis shows that, while these techniques make important first steps towards explainable Authorship Identification, more work remains to be done in order to provide tools that can be profitably integrated in the workflows of scholars.</p>","PeriodicalId":54310,"journal":{"name":"ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3654675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While a substantial amount of work has recently been devoted to improving the accuracy of computational Authorship Identification (AId) systems for textual data, little to no attention has been paid to endowing AId systems with the ability to explain the reasons behind their predictions. This substantially hinders the practical application of AId methods, since the predictions returned by such systems are hardly useful unless they are supported by suitable explanations. In this paper, we explore the applicability of existing general-purpose eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to AId, with a focus on explanations addressed to scholars working in cultural heritage. In particular, we assess the relative merits of three different types of XAI techniques (feature ranking, probing, factual and counterfactual selection) on three different AId tasks (authorship attribution, authorship verification, same-authorship verification) by running experiments on real AId textual data. Our analysis shows that, while these techniques make important first steps towards explainable Authorship Identification, more work remains to be done in order to provide tools that can be profitably integrated in the workflows of scholars.

文化遗产应用中可解释的作者身份识别
虽然最近有大量工作致力于提高文本数据计算作者身份识别(AId)系统的准确性,但很少有人关注赋予 AId 系统解释其预测背后原因的能力。这在很大程度上阻碍了 AId 方法的实际应用,因为除非有适当的解释支持,否则这些系统返回的预测结果很难发挥作用。在本文中,我们探讨了现有通用可解释人工智能(XAI)技术对人工智能的适用性,重点是针对文化遗产领域学者的解释。具体而言,我们通过在真实的 AId 文本数据上进行实验,评估了三种不同类型的 XAI 技术(特征排序、探测、事实和反事实选择)在三种不同的 AId 任务(作者归属、作者身份验证、同一作者身份验证)上的相对优势。我们的分析表明,虽然这些技术在实现可解释的作者身份识别方面迈出了重要的第一步,但要提供可有效集成到学者工作流程中的工具,还有更多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) publishes papers of significant and lasting value in all areas relating to the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in support of Cultural Heritage. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that demonstrate innovative use of technology for the discovery, analysis, interpretation and presentation of cultural material, as well as manuscripts that illustrate applications in the Cultural Heritage sector that challenge the computational technologies and suggest new research opportunities in computer science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信