{"title":"Piercing the Veil of TVL: DeFi Reappraised","authors":"Yichen Luo, Yebo Feng, Jiahua Xu, Paolo Tasca","doi":"arxiv-2404.11745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Total value locked (TVL) is widely used to measure the size and popularity of\nprotocols and the broader ecosystem in decentralized finance (DeFi). However,\nthe prevalent TVL calculation framework suffers from a \"double counting\" issue\nthat results in an inflated metric. We find existing methodologies addressing\ndouble counting either inconsistent or flawed. To mitigate the double counting\nissue, we formalize the TVL framework and propose a new framework, total value\nredeemable (TVR), designed to accurately assess the true value within\nindividual DeFi protocol and DeFi systems. The formalization of TVL indicates\nthat decentralized financial contagion propagates through derivative tokens\nacross the complex network of DeFi protocols and escalates liquidations and\nstablecoin depegging during market turmoil. By mirroring the concept of money\nmultiplier in traditional finance (TradFi), we construct the DeFi multiplier to\nquantify the double counting in TVL. Our empirical analysis demonstrates a\nnotable enhancement in the performance of TVR relative to TVL. Specifically,\nduring the peak of DeFi activity on December 2, 2021, the discrepancy between\nTVL and TVR widened to \\$139.87 billion, resulting in a TVL-to-TVR ratio of\napproximately 2. We further show that TVR is a more stable metric than TVL,\nespecially during market turmoil. For instance, a 25% decrease in the price of\nEther (ETH) results in an overestimation of the DeFi market value by more than\n\\$1 billion when measuring using TVL as opposed to TVR. Overall, our findings\nsuggest that TVR provides a more reliable and stable metric compared to the\ntraditional TVL calculation.","PeriodicalId":501372,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.11745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Total value locked (TVL) is widely used to measure the size and popularity of
protocols and the broader ecosystem in decentralized finance (DeFi). However,
the prevalent TVL calculation framework suffers from a "double counting" issue
that results in an inflated metric. We find existing methodologies addressing
double counting either inconsistent or flawed. To mitigate the double counting
issue, we formalize the TVL framework and propose a new framework, total value
redeemable (TVR), designed to accurately assess the true value within
individual DeFi protocol and DeFi systems. The formalization of TVL indicates
that decentralized financial contagion propagates through derivative tokens
across the complex network of DeFi protocols and escalates liquidations and
stablecoin depegging during market turmoil. By mirroring the concept of money
multiplier in traditional finance (TradFi), we construct the DeFi multiplier to
quantify the double counting in TVL. Our empirical analysis demonstrates a
notable enhancement in the performance of TVR relative to TVL. Specifically,
during the peak of DeFi activity on December 2, 2021, the discrepancy between
TVL and TVR widened to \$139.87 billion, resulting in a TVL-to-TVR ratio of
approximately 2. We further show that TVR is a more stable metric than TVL,
especially during market turmoil. For instance, a 25% decrease in the price of
Ether (ETH) results in an overestimation of the DeFi market value by more than
\$1 billion when measuring using TVL as opposed to TVR. Overall, our findings
suggest that TVR provides a more reliable and stable metric compared to the
traditional TVL calculation.