Optimal Neighborhood Contexts in Explainable AI: An Explanandum-Based Evaluation

Urja Pawar;Donna O'Shea;Ruairi O'Reilly;Maebh Costello;Christian Beder
{"title":"Optimal Neighborhood Contexts in Explainable AI: An Explanandum-Based Evaluation","authors":"Urja Pawar;Donna O'Shea;Ruairi O'Reilly;Maebh Costello;Christian Beder","doi":"10.1109/OJCS.2024.3389781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, several frameworks have been proposed in the domain of Explainable AI (XAI), however their practical applicability and utility need to be clarified. The neighbourhood contexts are shown to significantly impact the explanations generated by XAI frameworks, thus directly affecting their utility in addressing specific questions, or “explananda”. This work introduces a methodology that use a comprehensive range of neighbourhood contexts to evaluate and enhance the utility of specific XAI techniques, particularly Feature Importance and CounterFactuals. In this evaluation, two explananda are targeted. The first one examines whether features' collection should be halted as per the AI model based on the sufficiency of the current set of information. Here, the information refers to the features present in the data used to train the AI-based system. The second one explores what is the most effective information (features) that should be collected next to ensure that the AI outputs the same classification as it would have generated with all the information present. These questions serve as a platform to demonstrate our methodology's ability to assess the impact of customised neighbourhood contexts on the utility of XAI.","PeriodicalId":13205,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society","volume":"5 ","pages":"181-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10504877","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10504877/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the years, several frameworks have been proposed in the domain of Explainable AI (XAI), however their practical applicability and utility need to be clarified. The neighbourhood contexts are shown to significantly impact the explanations generated by XAI frameworks, thus directly affecting their utility in addressing specific questions, or “explananda”. This work introduces a methodology that use a comprehensive range of neighbourhood contexts to evaluate and enhance the utility of specific XAI techniques, particularly Feature Importance and CounterFactuals. In this evaluation, two explananda are targeted. The first one examines whether features' collection should be halted as per the AI model based on the sufficiency of the current set of information. Here, the information refers to the features present in the data used to train the AI-based system. The second one explores what is the most effective information (features) that should be collected next to ensure that the AI outputs the same classification as it would have generated with all the information present. These questions serve as a platform to demonstrate our methodology's ability to assess the impact of customised neighbourhood contexts on the utility of XAI.
可解释人工智能中的最佳邻域语境:基于解释备忘录的评估
多年来,在可解释人工智能(XAI)领域提出了多个框架,但其实际适用性和效用仍有待澄清。研究表明,邻域环境会对 XAI 框架生成的解释产生重大影响,从而直接影响其在解决特定问题或 "解释 "方面的效用。这项工作介绍了一种方法,利用全面的邻域环境来评估和提高特定 XAI 技术的效用,特别是特征重要性和反事实。在这项评估中,有两个解释对象。第一种解释是,根据当前信息集的充足性,按照人工智能模型是否应该停止收集特征。这里的信息指的是用于训练人工智能系统的数据中存在的特征。第二个问题是探讨下一步应该收集哪些最有效的信息(特征),以确保人工智能输出的分类结果与其在收集到所有信息的情况下产生的分类结果相同。这些问题作为一个平台,展示了我们的方法能够评估定制化邻里环境对 XAI 实用性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信