Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the overactive bladder: A single‐arm trial

Hnin Yee Kyaw, Hannah G. Krause, Judith T.W. Goh
{"title":"Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the overactive bladder: A single‐arm trial","authors":"Hnin Yee Kyaw, Hannah G. Krause, Judith T.W. Goh","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimsWe hypothesise that PTNS is a safe and effective treatment for OAB. Overactive bladder (OAB) is estimated to affect 11.8% of women worldwide, causing diminished quality of life. Lifestyle modifications, muscarinic receptor antagonist and beta‐adrenoreceptor agonist remain the mainstay of treatment but are limited by their efficacy and adverse effects. Access to third‐line therapies of intravesical botulinum toxin type A or sacral neuromodulation is limited by their invasive nature. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has emerged as a non‐invasive treatment option for OAB.MethodsThis study was a single‐arm trial of women requesting third‐line treatment for OAB. The primary treatment outcome was patient‐reported visual analogue score (VAS) improvement of at least 50%. Secondary outcome measures were Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI‐6) score and two‐day bladder diary. Patients also provided feedback on adverse effects encountered.ResultsIn the 84 women recruited, initial treatment protocol showed a success rate of 77.2% among those who completed treatment based on VAS, with a statistically significant improvement in mean UDI‐6 score of 20.13 (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.01, standard deviation: 12.52). Continued success following tapering protocol of 60.8% and a mean maintenance protocol of 14.2 months was achieved. No adverse effects were reported.ConclusionThe results from this study are in concordance with previously published literature on the effectiveness and safety of PTNS as a treatment modality for OAB. Further randomised controlled trials to evaluate the optimal treatment protocol are warranted to establish a standardised regime.","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimsWe hypothesise that PTNS is a safe and effective treatment for OAB. Overactive bladder (OAB) is estimated to affect 11.8% of women worldwide, causing diminished quality of life. Lifestyle modifications, muscarinic receptor antagonist and beta‐adrenoreceptor agonist remain the mainstay of treatment but are limited by their efficacy and adverse effects. Access to third‐line therapies of intravesical botulinum toxin type A or sacral neuromodulation is limited by their invasive nature. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has emerged as a non‐invasive treatment option for OAB.MethodsThis study was a single‐arm trial of women requesting third‐line treatment for OAB. The primary treatment outcome was patient‐reported visual analogue score (VAS) improvement of at least 50%. Secondary outcome measures were Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI‐6) score and two‐day bladder diary. Patients also provided feedback on adverse effects encountered.ResultsIn the 84 women recruited, initial treatment protocol showed a success rate of 77.2% among those who completed treatment based on VAS, with a statistically significant improvement in mean UDI‐6 score of 20.13 (P < 0.01, standard deviation: 12.52). Continued success following tapering protocol of 60.8% and a mean maintenance protocol of 14.2 months was achieved. No adverse effects were reported.ConclusionThe results from this study are in concordance with previously published literature on the effectiveness and safety of PTNS as a treatment modality for OAB. Further randomised controlled trials to evaluate the optimal treatment protocol are warranted to establish a standardised regime.
经皮胫神经刺激治疗膀胱过度活动症:单臂试验
目的我们假设 PTNS 是治疗膀胱过度活动症的一种安全有效的方法。据估计,膀胱过度活动症(OAB)影响着全球 11.8% 的女性,导致生活质量下降。改变生活方式、毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂和β-肾上腺素受体激动剂仍是治疗的主要手段,但其疗效和不良反应均受到限制。膀胱内注射 A 型肉毒毒素或骶神经调控的三线疗法因其侵入性而受到限制。经皮胫神经刺激疗法(PTNS)已成为治疗 OAB 的一种非侵入性疗法。主要治疗结果是患者报告的视觉模拟评分(VAS)改善至少50%。次要结果指标为尿压力量表简表(UDI-6)评分和两天膀胱日记。结果 在招募的 84 名妇女中,根据视觉模拟评分完成治疗的患者中,初始治疗方案的成功率为 77.2%,UDI-6 平均得分显著提高了 20.13 分(P < 0.01,标准偏差:12.52)。60.8%的患者在减量方案后继续成功治疗,平均维持方案时间为 14.2 个月。结论这项研究的结果与之前发表的有关 PTNS 作为 OAB 治疗方法的有效性和安全性的文献一致。有必要进一步开展随机对照试验,评估最佳治疗方案,以建立标准化的治疗体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信