Qualitative interviews of patients with COPD and muscle weakness enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating a new anabolic treatment: patient perspectives of disease experience, trial participation and outcome assessments

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maggie Tabberer, Nicola Williamson, Sophi Tatlock, Adam Gater, Rebecca Grimes, Chika Akinseye, David Neil, Aoife Mahon-Smith, Linda Nelsen
{"title":"Qualitative interviews of patients with COPD and muscle weakness enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating a new anabolic treatment: patient perspectives of disease experience, trial participation and outcome assessments","authors":"Maggie Tabberer, Nicola Williamson, Sophi Tatlock, Adam Gater, Rebecca Grimes, Chika Akinseye, David Neil, Aoife Mahon-Smith, Linda Nelsen","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00712-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and muscle weakness can cause impaired physical function, significantly impacting patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Loss of muscle strength is usually assessed through clinical and performance outcome (PerfO) assessments, which consists of tasks performed in a standardized manner, providing evidence of a patient’s functional ability. However, evidence documenting the patient experience of COPD and muscle weakness is limited. This two-stage qualitative study used semi-structured interviews in patients aged 45–80 years with COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1]/forced vital capacity ratio < 0.70, and FEV1% predicted of 30–80%) and muscle weakness. In Stage 1, 30-minute concept elicitation interviews were conducted with participants recruited across three US sites to explore impacts on physical functioning and activities of daily living. In Stage 2, interviews were performed with participants exiting a Phase IIa trial investigating the efficacy of a selective androgen receptor modulator (GSK2881078) on leg strength, whereby PerfOs were used to evaluate strength and physical functioning endpoints. These participants completed either 60-minute in-depth (n = 32) or 15-minute confirmatory (n = 35) interviews exploring trial experience, completion of outcome measures, disease experience and treatment satisfaction. In Stage 1 (n = 20), most participants described their muscles as weak (83.3%). Difficulties with walking (100%) and lifting heavy objects (90%) were reported. In Stage 2, 60-minute interviews, all participants (n = 32) reported a positive trial experience. Most participants reported that the home exercise program was easy to fit into daily life (77.8%), the PROactive daily diary was easy to complete (100%) and wearable sensors were easy to use (65.6%). However, technical issues were reported (71%), and few participants (19.4%) found physical assessments easy to complete. Improvements in muscle strength and functional limitations were reported by most participants. The shorter 15-minute confirmatory interviews (n = 35) supported the in-depth interview results. The qualitative interviews generated in-depth evidence of key concepts relevant to patients with COPD and muscle weakness and support the assessments of patient strength and physical function as outcome measures in this population in future studies. GSK Stage 1: 206869; Stage 2: 200182, NCT03359473; Registered December 2, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03359473 .","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00712-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and muscle weakness can cause impaired physical function, significantly impacting patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Loss of muscle strength is usually assessed through clinical and performance outcome (PerfO) assessments, which consists of tasks performed in a standardized manner, providing evidence of a patient’s functional ability. However, evidence documenting the patient experience of COPD and muscle weakness is limited. This two-stage qualitative study used semi-structured interviews in patients aged 45–80 years with COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1]/forced vital capacity ratio < 0.70, and FEV1% predicted of 30–80%) and muscle weakness. In Stage 1, 30-minute concept elicitation interviews were conducted with participants recruited across three US sites to explore impacts on physical functioning and activities of daily living. In Stage 2, interviews were performed with participants exiting a Phase IIa trial investigating the efficacy of a selective androgen receptor modulator (GSK2881078) on leg strength, whereby PerfOs were used to evaluate strength and physical functioning endpoints. These participants completed either 60-minute in-depth (n = 32) or 15-minute confirmatory (n = 35) interviews exploring trial experience, completion of outcome measures, disease experience and treatment satisfaction. In Stage 1 (n = 20), most participants described their muscles as weak (83.3%). Difficulties with walking (100%) and lifting heavy objects (90%) were reported. In Stage 2, 60-minute interviews, all participants (n = 32) reported a positive trial experience. Most participants reported that the home exercise program was easy to fit into daily life (77.8%), the PROactive daily diary was easy to complete (100%) and wearable sensors were easy to use (65.6%). However, technical issues were reported (71%), and few participants (19.4%) found physical assessments easy to complete. Improvements in muscle strength and functional limitations were reported by most participants. The shorter 15-minute confirmatory interviews (n = 35) supported the in-depth interview results. The qualitative interviews generated in-depth evidence of key concepts relevant to patients with COPD and muscle weakness and support the assessments of patient strength and physical function as outcome measures in this population in future studies. GSK Stage 1: 206869; Stage 2: 200182, NCT03359473; Registered December 2, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03359473 .
对慢性阻塞性肺病和肌无力患者的定性访谈:患者对疾病经历、试验参与和结果评估的观点
慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和肌无力会导致身体功能受损,严重影响患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。肌力损失通常通过临床和表现结果(PerfO)评估来进行评估,其中包括以标准化方式完成的任务,为患者的功能能力提供证据。然而,记录慢性阻塞性肺病和肌无力患者经历的证据非常有限。这项分两个阶段进行的定性研究采用半结构式访谈的方式,采访了 45-80 岁的慢性阻塞性肺病患者(支气管扩张后 1 秒内用力呼气容积 [FEV1] 与用力肺活量之比小于 0.70,FEV1 预测值为 30-80%)和肌无力患者。在第一阶段,对在美国三个地点招募的参与者进行了 30 分钟的概念激发访谈,以探讨对身体功能和日常生活活动的影响。在第 2 阶段,对退出研究选择性雄激素受体调节剂(GSK2881078)对腿部力量疗效的 IIa 期试验的参与者进行了访谈,通过 PerfOs 评估力量和身体功能终点。这些参与者完成了 60 分钟的深入访谈(32 人)或 15 分钟的确认访谈(35 人),探讨试验经历、结果测量的完成情况、疾病经历和治疗满意度。在第一阶段(n = 20),大多数参与者称自己肌肉无力(83.3%)。据报告,行走困难(100%)和举重物困难(90%)。在第二阶段 60 分钟的访谈中,所有参与者(n = 32)都表示试用体验良好。大多数参与者表示,家庭锻炼计划很容易融入日常生活(77.8%),PROactive 日志很容易完成(100%),可穿戴传感器很容易使用(65.6%)。不过,也有报告称存在技术问题(71%),很少有参与者(19.4%)认为体能评估易于完成。大多数参与者表示肌肉力量和功能限制有所改善。较短的 15 分钟确认性访谈(n = 35)证实了深度访谈的结果。定性访谈深入证明了与慢性阻塞性肺病和肌无力患者相关的关键概念,并支持在未来的研究中将患者的力量和身体功能评估作为该人群的结果测量指标。葛兰素史克第一阶段:206869;第二阶段:200182,NCT03359473;2017 年 12 月 2 日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03359473 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信