{"title":"EXTENSIONS AND LIMITS OF THE SPECKER–BLATTER THEOREM","authors":"ELDAR FISCHER, JOHANN A. MAKOWSKY","doi":"10.1017/jsl.2024.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The original Specker–Blatter theorem (1983) was formulated for classes of structures <span><span><img data-mimesubtype=\"png\" data-type=\"\" src=\"https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240418114435066-0017:S0022481224000173:S0022481224000173_inline1.png\"><span data-mathjax-type=\"texmath\"><span>$\\mathcal {C}$</span></span></img></span></span> of one or several binary relations definable in Monadic Second Order Logic MSOL. It states that the number of such structures on the set <span><span><img data-mimesubtype=\"png\" data-type=\"\" src=\"https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240418114435066-0017:S0022481224000173:S0022481224000173_inline2.png\"><span data-mathjax-type=\"texmath\"><span>$[n]$</span></span></img></span></span> is modularly C-finite (MC-finite). In previous work we extended this to structures definable in CMSOL, MSOL extended with modular counting quantifiers. The first author also showed that the Specker–Blatter theorem does not hold for one quaternary relation (2003).</p><p>If the vocabulary allows a constant symbol <span>c</span>, there are <span>n</span> possible interpretations on <span><span><img data-mimesubtype=\"png\" data-type=\"\" src=\"https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240418114435066-0017:S0022481224000173:S0022481224000173_inline3.png\"><span data-mathjax-type=\"texmath\"><span>$[n]$</span></span></img></span></span> for <span>c</span>. We say that a constant <span>c</span> is <span>hard-wired</span> if <span>c</span> is always interpreted by the same element <span><span><img data-mimesubtype=\"png\" data-type=\"\" src=\"https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240418114435066-0017:S0022481224000173:S0022481224000173_inline4.png\"><span data-mathjax-type=\"texmath\"><span>$j \\in [n]$</span></span></img></span></span>. In this paper we show: </p><ol><li><p><span>(i)</span> The Specker–Blatter theorem also holds for CMSOL when hard-wired constants are allowed. The proof method of Specker and Blatter does not work in this case.</p></li><li><p><span>(ii)</span> The Specker–Blatter theorem does not hold already for <span><span><img data-mimesubtype=\"png\" data-type=\"\" src=\"https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240418114435066-0017:S0022481224000173:S0022481224000173_inline5.png\"><span data-mathjax-type=\"texmath\"><span>$\\mathcal {C}$</span></span></img></span></span> with one ternary relation definable in First Order Logic FOL. This was left open since 1983.</p></li></ol><p></p><p>Using hard-wired constants allows us to show MC-finiteness of counting functions of various restricted partition functions which were not known to be MC-finite till now. Among them we have the restricted Bell numbers <span><span><img data-mimesubtype=\"png\" data-type=\"\" src=\"https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240418114435066-0017:S0022481224000173:S0022481224000173_inline6.png\"><span data-mathjax-type=\"texmath\"><span>$B_{r,A}$</span></span></img></span></span>, restricted Stirling numbers of the second kind <span><span><img data-mimesubtype=\"png\" data-type=\"\" src=\"https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240418114435066-0017:S0022481224000173:S0022481224000173_inline7.png\"><span data-mathjax-type=\"texmath\"><span>$S_{r,A}$</span></span></img></span></span> or restricted Lah-numbers <span><span><img data-mimesubtype=\"png\" data-type=\"\" src=\"https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240418114435066-0017:S0022481224000173:S0022481224000173_inline8.png\"><span data-mathjax-type=\"texmath\"><span>$L_{r,A}$</span></span></img></span></span>. Here <span>r</span> is a non-negative integer and <span>A</span> is an ultimately periodic set of non-negative integers.</p>","PeriodicalId":501300,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Symbolic Logic","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsl.2024.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The original Specker–Blatter theorem (1983) was formulated for classes of structures $\mathcal {C}$ of one or several binary relations definable in Monadic Second Order Logic MSOL. It states that the number of such structures on the set $[n]$ is modularly C-finite (MC-finite). In previous work we extended this to structures definable in CMSOL, MSOL extended with modular counting quantifiers. The first author also showed that the Specker–Blatter theorem does not hold for one quaternary relation (2003).
If the vocabulary allows a constant symbol c, there are n possible interpretations on $[n]$ for c. We say that a constant c is hard-wired if c is always interpreted by the same element $j \in [n]$. In this paper we show:
(i) The Specker–Blatter theorem also holds for CMSOL when hard-wired constants are allowed. The proof method of Specker and Blatter does not work in this case.
(ii) The Specker–Blatter theorem does not hold already for $\mathcal {C}$ with one ternary relation definable in First Order Logic FOL. This was left open since 1983.
Using hard-wired constants allows us to show MC-finiteness of counting functions of various restricted partition functions which were not known to be MC-finite till now. Among them we have the restricted Bell numbers $B_{r,A}$, restricted Stirling numbers of the second kind $S_{r,A}$ or restricted Lah-numbers $L_{r,A}$. Here r is a non-negative integer and A is an ultimately periodic set of non-negative integers.