The feasibility and acceptability of integrating dogs into inpatient rehabilitation therapy with children with acquired brain injury

Pm & R Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13176
Megan E. Narad, Kaelynn Knestrick, Shari L. Wade, Brad G. Kurowski, Allen R. McConnell, Catherine C. Quatman‐Yates
{"title":"The feasibility and acceptability of integrating dogs into inpatient rehabilitation therapy with children with acquired brain injury","authors":"Megan E. Narad, Kaelynn Knestrick, Shari L. Wade, Brad G. Kurowski, Allen R. McConnell, Catherine C. Quatman‐Yates","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionChildren with acquired brain injury (ABI) are at risk for poor therapeutic engagement due to cognitive impairment, affect lability, pain, and fatigue. Animal‐assisted therapy (AAT) has the potential to improve patient engagement in rehabilitation therapies; however, the feasibility of integrating AAT into the rigorous therapy schedule of inpatient clinical care or its reception by patients, families, and staff is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating dogs into physical therapy and occupational therapy sessions with pediatric patients being treated on an inpatient rehabilitation unit for acquired brain injury.DesignA feasibility study of AAT within the context of a within‐subjects crossover study.SettingPediatric inpatient rehabilitation unit.ParticipantsSixteen patients, aged 7–28 years (mean = 13.6 years, standard deviation [SD] = 5.2 years; 50% male), being treated on the inpatient rehabilitation unit following ABI.InterventionAAT – the integration of dogs into inpatient physical therapy and occupational therapy sessions.Main Outcome MeasuresFeasibility measures: enrollment rate, the proportion of AAT sessions a dog attended, adverse events, instances where therapist or handler ended session early, patient animal closeness, and utilization of dog in session. Satisfaction measures: parent satisfaction questionnaires and therapist feedback.ResultsFeasibility was supported by high enrollment rate (88.9%) and dog attendance rate of 93%–95%; 84.3% of sessions used the dog in multiple ways and patients reported a high level of closeness with the dog in session, indicating that the dogs were integrated in meaningful ways. No adverse events were noted, therapists reported that intervention was convenient, and clinical care was not negatively impacted. A high level of satisfaction was reported by families and therapists.ConclusionsFindings suggest that AAT is feasible and acceptable, and it may be a valuable tool for therapists working with patients with ABI on an inpatient rehabilitation unit.","PeriodicalId":20287,"journal":{"name":"Pm & R","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pm & R","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionChildren with acquired brain injury (ABI) are at risk for poor therapeutic engagement due to cognitive impairment, affect lability, pain, and fatigue. Animal‐assisted therapy (AAT) has the potential to improve patient engagement in rehabilitation therapies; however, the feasibility of integrating AAT into the rigorous therapy schedule of inpatient clinical care or its reception by patients, families, and staff is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating dogs into physical therapy and occupational therapy sessions with pediatric patients being treated on an inpatient rehabilitation unit for acquired brain injury.DesignA feasibility study of AAT within the context of a within‐subjects crossover study.SettingPediatric inpatient rehabilitation unit.ParticipantsSixteen patients, aged 7–28 years (mean = 13.6 years, standard deviation [SD] = 5.2 years; 50% male), being treated on the inpatient rehabilitation unit following ABI.InterventionAAT – the integration of dogs into inpatient physical therapy and occupational therapy sessions.Main Outcome MeasuresFeasibility measures: enrollment rate, the proportion of AAT sessions a dog attended, adverse events, instances where therapist or handler ended session early, patient animal closeness, and utilization of dog in session. Satisfaction measures: parent satisfaction questionnaires and therapist feedback.ResultsFeasibility was supported by high enrollment rate (88.9%) and dog attendance rate of 93%–95%; 84.3% of sessions used the dog in multiple ways and patients reported a high level of closeness with the dog in session, indicating that the dogs were integrated in meaningful ways. No adverse events were noted, therapists reported that intervention was convenient, and clinical care was not negatively impacted. A high level of satisfaction was reported by families and therapists.ConclusionsFindings suggest that AAT is feasible and acceptable, and it may be a valuable tool for therapists working with patients with ABI on an inpatient rehabilitation unit.
将狗纳入后天性脑损伤儿童住院康复治疗的可行性和可接受性
导言:后天性脑损伤(ABI)患儿由于认知障碍、情绪不稳定、疼痛和疲劳等原因,有可能无法很好地参与治疗。目标研究在后天性脑损伤住院康复病房接受治疗的儿科患者的物理疗法和作业疗法中加入狗的可行性和可接受性。设计在受试者内交叉研究的背景下进行动物辅助治疗的可行性研究。干预AAT--将狗融入住院物理治疗和职业治疗疗程中。主要结果测量可行性测量:入院率、狗参加的AAT疗程比例、不良事件、治疗师或驯养师提前结束疗程的情况、患者与动物的亲近程度以及疗程中狗的使用情况。满意度测量:家长满意度问卷和治疗师反馈。结果高注册率(88.9%)和狗的出席率(93%-95%)证明了可行性;84.3%的疗程以多种方式使用狗,患者报告说在疗程中与狗的亲近程度很高,这表明狗以有意义的方式融入了疗程。没有发现不良事件,治疗师表示干预很方便,临床护理也没有受到负面影响。结论研究结果表明,AAT 是可行的,也是可以接受的,对于在住院康复病房工作的 ABI 患者治疗师来说,它可能是一种有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信