Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering paradox “2=1” for N qubits

IF 1.5 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Zhi-Jie Liu, Jie Zhou, Hui-Xian Meng, Xing-Yan Fan, Mi Xie, Fu-Lin Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen
{"title":"Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering paradox “2=1” for N qubits","authors":"Zhi-Jie Liu, Jie Zhou, Hui-Xian Meng, Xing-Yan Fan, Mi Xie, Fu-Lin Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen","doi":"10.1142/s0217732324500305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox highlights the absence of a local realistic explanation for quantum mechanics, and shows the incompatibility of the local-hidden-state models with quantum theory. For <i>N</i>-qubit states, or more importantly, the <i>N</i>-qubit mixed states, we present the EPR steering paradox in the form of the contradictory equality “<span><math altimg=\"eq-00003.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mn>2</mn><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></math></span><span></span>”. We show that the contradiction holds for any <i>N</i>-qubit state as long as both “the pure state requirement” and “the measurement requirement” are satisfied. This also indicates that the EPR steering paradox exists in more general cases. Finally, we give specific examples to demonstrate and analyze our arguments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18752,"journal":{"name":"Modern Physics Letters A","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Physics Letters A","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732324500305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox highlights the absence of a local realistic explanation for quantum mechanics, and shows the incompatibility of the local-hidden-state models with quantum theory. For N-qubit states, or more importantly, the N-qubit mixed states, we present the EPR steering paradox in the form of the contradictory equality “2=1”. We show that the contradiction holds for any N-qubit state as long as both “the pure state requirement” and “the measurement requirement” are satisfied. This also indicates that the EPR steering paradox exists in more general cases. Finally, we give specific examples to demonstrate and analyze our arguments.

N 个量子比特的爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森转向悖论 "2=1"
爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森(EPR)悖论凸显了量子力学缺乏局部现实的解释,并表明局部隐态模型与量子理论不相容。对于 N 量子位态,或更重要的 N 量子位混合态,我们以矛盾相等 "2=1 "的形式提出了 EPR 转向悖论。我们证明,只要同时满足 "纯态要求 "和 "测量要求",这个矛盾对于任何 N 量子比特态都成立。这也表明,EPR转向悖论存在于更普遍的情况中。最后,我们给出了具体的例子来证明和分析我们的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Physics Letters A
Modern Physics Letters A 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This letters journal, launched in 1986, consists of research papers covering current research developments in Gravitation, Cosmology, Astrophysics, Nuclear Physics, Particles and Fields, Accelerator physics, and Quantum Information. A Brief Review section has also been initiated with the purpose of publishing short reports on the latest experimental findings and urgent new theoretical developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信