{"title":"Outback and Out West: The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary by Tom Lynch (review)","authors":"Alex Trimble Young","doi":"10.1353/wal.2024.a924892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Outback and Out West: The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary</em> by Tom Lynch <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Alex Trimble Young </li> </ul> Tom Lynch, <em>Outback and Out West: The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary</em>. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 2022. 348 pp. Hardcover, $60; e-book, $60. <p>The importation of Australian settler colonial theory into the US academy has occasioned a surge of scholarly exchange between the United States and Australia during the last two decades. This exchange has not, however—with a few happy exceptions—been accompanied by the widespread adaptation of the transnational comparative method that produced that theory. This state of affairs makes Tom Lynch's <em>Outback and Out West: The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary</em> an especially welcome addition to transnational research on the literature of the US West, environmental humanities, and settler colonial studies. In this thoroughly researched comparative study of settler environmental writing in the two storied and arid regions named in his title, Lynch engages settler colonial studies not as a source of theoretical dogma but as a method for his challenging and original comparative close readings.</p> <p>Lynch's central argument hinges on the claim that settler literary representations of the ecologies of the Outback and the West are both inflected by the settler colonial imaginary, a fantasy forged in the violence of conquest that shapes even the most seemingly benign forms of settler environmental writing. Identifying this transnational connection, Lynch argues, destabilizes not only the nationalist allegories that imagine the Outback and the West as synecdoches for the exceptional status of the nation-states of which they are a part but also countercultural claims of so much environmental <strong>[End Page 402]</strong> writing, which, he convincingly argues, can be settler colonial even when they are explicitly antinationalist.</p> <p><em>Outback and Out West</em> makes this nuanced argument by engaging the formal traditions of ecocriticism and bioregionalism, even as Lynch's settler colonial critique unsettles some of the key assumptions of those fields. <em>Outback and Out West</em> calls to mind the work of ecocritics like Scott Slovic in its organization, alternating between \"field notes,\" brief travelogues narrating Lynch's personal experiences exploring the two regions he analyzes, and thematically organized chapters of comparative literary criticism.</p> <p>While arguably undercutting the too-often imperious authority of disinterested cultural criticism, the field notes sections also tentatively unsettle their own implicit claim on authority. Much of the prose in these personal narratives reads like the work of the white naturalists of the last century, enthusiastically documenting the local geology, flora, and fauna Lynch encounters as he traverses the storied landscapes of the Outback and the US West. At the same time Lynch writes with a keen if awkward awareness of how his standpoint inflects his experience of these landscapes. At one point he pauses in a description of an Outback landscape to consider the Indigenous perspective on the place, noting that \"there is another landscape, invisible to the likes of me, that lives within and animates this more obvious one. I can intuit aspects of it, but its details are out of my range of vision, and really none of my business\" (89). The \"field notes\" sections thus highlight contradictions latent in the relation between the author's ecological enthusiasms and his political commitments without attempting to resolve them, leaving readers to judge for themselves.</p> <p>The real strength of <em>Outback and Out West</em> is found in its comparative close readings. At their best Lynch's careful readings identify not only structural similarities between literary representations of the environment in both places but particular phrases that reoccur with startling frequency in both regional literatures, repeated like mantras that attempt to establish settler sovereignty and ownership as facts of nature. His first chapter explores one such phrase, \"this very spot,\" that appears repeatedly in memoirs and travelogues that seek to retrace the steps of the first settler explorers in a region, a literary preoccupation of writers in both the West and the <strong>[End Page 403]</strong> Outback. By attempting to embody the perspective of these explorers, Lynch argues, contemporary writers in both locales reinforce a peculiarly and perniciously settler colonial relation to place. Another standout analysis in this regard comes in Lynch's fourth chapter (developed out of an article...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":23875,"journal":{"name":"Western American Literature","volume":"200 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western American Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wal.2024.a924892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
Outback and Out West: The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary by Tom Lynch
Alex Trimble Young
Tom Lynch, Outback and Out West: The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 2022. 348 pp. Hardcover, $60; e-book, $60.
The importation of Australian settler colonial theory into the US academy has occasioned a surge of scholarly exchange between the United States and Australia during the last two decades. This exchange has not, however—with a few happy exceptions—been accompanied by the widespread adaptation of the transnational comparative method that produced that theory. This state of affairs makes Tom Lynch's Outback and Out West: The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary an especially welcome addition to transnational research on the literature of the US West, environmental humanities, and settler colonial studies. In this thoroughly researched comparative study of settler environmental writing in the two storied and arid regions named in his title, Lynch engages settler colonial studies not as a source of theoretical dogma but as a method for his challenging and original comparative close readings.
Lynch's central argument hinges on the claim that settler literary representations of the ecologies of the Outback and the West are both inflected by the settler colonial imaginary, a fantasy forged in the violence of conquest that shapes even the most seemingly benign forms of settler environmental writing. Identifying this transnational connection, Lynch argues, destabilizes not only the nationalist allegories that imagine the Outback and the West as synecdoches for the exceptional status of the nation-states of which they are a part but also countercultural claims of so much environmental [End Page 402] writing, which, he convincingly argues, can be settler colonial even when they are explicitly antinationalist.
Outback and Out West makes this nuanced argument by engaging the formal traditions of ecocriticism and bioregionalism, even as Lynch's settler colonial critique unsettles some of the key assumptions of those fields. Outback and Out West calls to mind the work of ecocritics like Scott Slovic in its organization, alternating between "field notes," brief travelogues narrating Lynch's personal experiences exploring the two regions he analyzes, and thematically organized chapters of comparative literary criticism.
While arguably undercutting the too-often imperious authority of disinterested cultural criticism, the field notes sections also tentatively unsettle their own implicit claim on authority. Much of the prose in these personal narratives reads like the work of the white naturalists of the last century, enthusiastically documenting the local geology, flora, and fauna Lynch encounters as he traverses the storied landscapes of the Outback and the US West. At the same time Lynch writes with a keen if awkward awareness of how his standpoint inflects his experience of these landscapes. At one point he pauses in a description of an Outback landscape to consider the Indigenous perspective on the place, noting that "there is another landscape, invisible to the likes of me, that lives within and animates this more obvious one. I can intuit aspects of it, but its details are out of my range of vision, and really none of my business" (89). The "field notes" sections thus highlight contradictions latent in the relation between the author's ecological enthusiasms and his political commitments without attempting to resolve them, leaving readers to judge for themselves.
The real strength of Outback and Out West is found in its comparative close readings. At their best Lynch's careful readings identify not only structural similarities between literary representations of the environment in both places but particular phrases that reoccur with startling frequency in both regional literatures, repeated like mantras that attempt to establish settler sovereignty and ownership as facts of nature. His first chapter explores one such phrase, "this very spot," that appears repeatedly in memoirs and travelogues that seek to retrace the steps of the first settler explorers in a region, a literary preoccupation of writers in both the West and the [End Page 403] Outback. By attempting to embody the perspective of these explorers, Lynch argues, contemporary writers in both locales reinforce a peculiarly and perniciously settler colonial relation to place. Another standout analysis in this regard comes in Lynch's fourth chapter (developed out of an article...
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 内陆和西部:汤姆-林奇(Tom Lynch)的《定居者-殖民者的环境想象》(The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary by Tom Lynch Alex Trimble Young Tom Lynch, Outback and Out West:The Settler-Colonial Environmental Imaginary.林肯:内布拉斯加大学出版社,2022 年。348 pp.精装,60 美元;电子书,60 美元。过去二十年间,澳大利亚殖民定居理论被引入美国学术界,掀起了美澳学术交流的热潮。然而,除了几个令人高兴的例外,这种交流并没有伴随着产生该理论的跨国比较方法的广泛应用。这种状况使得汤姆-林奇(Tom Lynch)的《内陆与西部》(Outback and Out West:定居者-殖民地环境想象》是对美国西部文学、环境人文学科和定居者殖民地研究的跨国研究的一个特别值得欢迎的补充。在这本对标题中提到的两个充满传奇色彩的干旱地区的定居者环境写作进行深入研究的比较研究中,林奇不是将定居者殖民研究作为理论教条的来源,而是将其作为具有挑战性和独创性的比较细读方法。林奇的核心论点是,定居者文学对内陆和西部生态的表述都受到定居者殖民想象的影响,这种想象是在暴力征服中形成的,甚至塑造了定居者环境写作中最看似善意的形式。林奇认为,识别这种跨国联系不仅会破坏民族主义寓言的稳定性,这些寓言将内陆和西部想象成民族国家特殊地位的同义词,而且也会破坏大量环境 [尾页 402]写作的反文化主张。内陆与西部》通过与生态批评和生物区域主义的正式传统接触,提出了这一细致入微的论点,即使林奇的殖民定居批判颠覆了这些领域的一些关键假设。内陆和西部》在编排上让人想起斯科特-斯洛维奇(Scott Slovic)等生态批评家的作品,书中交替出现了 "田野笔记"、叙述林奇探索他所分析的两个地区的个人经历的简短游记,以及按主题编排的比较文学批评章节。可以说,田野笔记部分削弱了无私的文化批评往往具有的不可一世的权威性,同时也试探性地打破了其自身隐含的权威主张。这些个人叙事中的大部分散文读起来就像上世纪白人博物学家的作品,热情洋溢地记录了林奇在穿越内陆和美国西部的传奇景观时遇到的当地地质、植物和动物。同时,林奇在写作中敏锐地意识到,他的立场如何影响了他对这些景观的体验。有一次,他在描写内陆风景时停顿了一下,从土著人的角度思考这个地方,指出 "还有另一种风景,是我这样的人看不到的,它存在于这个更明显的风景之中,并使之生动。我可以直观地感受到它的某些方面,但它的细节不在我的视野范围之内,也与我无关"(89)。因此,"田野笔记 "部分强调了作者的生态热情与政治承诺之间潜在的矛盾,但并不试图解决这些矛盾,而是让读者自行判断。内陆与西部》的真正优势在于它的比较细读。林奇的细读不仅在结构上发现了两地环境文学表述的相似之处,而且还发现了一些特殊的短语,这些短语在两地文学作品中以惊人的频率重复出现,就像咒语一样,试图将定居者的主权和所有权确立为自然界的事实。他的第一章探讨了这样一个短语,"就在这个地方",这个短语反复出现在回忆录和游记中,这些回忆录和游记试图追溯第一批定居者探险者在一个地区的足迹,这也是西部和 [第 403 页] 内陆地区作家的文学关注点。林奇认为,通过试图体现这些探险家的视角,这两个地区的当代作家强化了殖民定居者与地方的特殊而有害的关系。林奇在第四章(由一篇文章发展而来)中进行了这方面的另一项杰出分析。