Young, Tough, Beautiful, and a Little Bit Crazy: The Forestry of Norman Maclean's Prose in USFS 1919: The Ranger, The Cook, and a Hole in the Sky

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Thomas Kaye
{"title":"Young, Tough, Beautiful, and a Little Bit Crazy: The Forestry of Norman Maclean's Prose in USFS 1919: The Ranger, The Cook, and a Hole in the Sky","authors":"Thomas Kaye","doi":"10.1353/wal.2024.a924879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Young, Tough, Beautiful, and a Little Bit Crazy<span>The Forestry of Norman Maclean's Prose in <em>USFS 1919: The Ranger, The Cook, and a Hole in the Sky</em></span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Thomas Kaye (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>\"It's a swell book. What I couldn't ever understand was what good the sword would do. It would have to stay edge up all the time because if it went over flat you could roll right over it and it wouldn't make any trouble.\"</p> <p>\"It's a symbol,\" Bill said.</p> <p>\"Sure,\" said Nick, \"but it isn't practical.\"</p> —Ernest Hemingway, \"The Three-Day Blow,\" <em>In Our Time</em> </blockquote> <p>This article will examine the \"world of the woods\" that has, for so long, been relegated to the furthest of backdrops in studies of Norman Maclean's writing (Maclean, \"An Incident\" 120). The novella <em>USFS 1919: The Ranger, The Cook, and a Hole in the Sky</em> will be the sole focus in this reading of Maclean's woods. It is a world best studied by analyzing the forestry of Maclean's prose. This term—\"the forestry of his prose\"—denotes both his writing about forestry and his craft of writing prose as an art akin to forestry. Forest ecologist Hamish Kimmins begins his definition of forestry by describing it as \"the art, science and practice of managing forested landscapes\" (49). By reading for the forestry of Maclean's prose, then, I will explore the art that has sprung from managing forested landscapes.</p> <p>In an interview with Studs Terkel in 1976 Maclean said of this world of the woods: \"everything was hand and horse . . . it was a world that was infinitely beautiful and very tough, and it's hard at times to tell the toughness from the beauty, it was a tough kind of beauty\" (00:03:07—00: 03:45). In this evocation of \"a world of hand <strong>[End Page 349]</strong> and horse\" Maclean's appreciation of skilled labor captures in miniature the complex relationship between beauty and utility that is at the heart of Maclean's forestry and a key concern of this article. With beauty and utility in mind, it should be noted that the forestry of Norman Maclean's prose does not necessarily involve descriptions of trees, but rather the hands-on business of working in the forest: a world of labor and social relationships.</p> <p>In contemporary ecocriticism it might seem jarring to discuss the beauty inherent in utilizing the woods. The statement Maclean makes in his speech \"An Incident\" that \"just watching a sawyer at work in the woods is . . . an art experience\" (120) could appear horrifying to someone suffering from what Aldo Leopold describes as \"one of the penalties of an ecological education . . . that one lives alone in a world of wounds\" (197). Surely the sawyer is inflicting another wound (just as surely as the tree has fallen)? Until recently, part of the problem has been, as David Fairer describes when making the case for the eco-georgic, that \"the ecocriticism of the past two decades [1990 to 2010] has tended to view the georgic as peripheral, even antagonistic, to 'green' principles\" (202). This was due in part to what Fairer describes as \"the monopolising grip of Romanticism\" upon ecocriticism (203). Thus, beauty in a text like <em>USFS 1919</em> that is georgic in its fascination with (as Maclean states) \"what men and women could do with their hands and heads in the world of the woods\" becomes a contentious subject (\"An Incident,\" 120).</p> <p>In his introduction to <em>A History of English Georgic Writing</em>, Paddy Bullard offers a succinct definition of the georgic split into \"two broad categories\" (1). Bullard describes the first as \"a category of genre, made up by imitations and adaptations of Virgil's <em>Georgics</em>,\" the poem that, as Bullard states, \"has lent its title most often as a general label for farming literature\" (1). The second category of georgic is defined by Bullard as \"one of theme and mode, and it covers all sorts of literary texts, in poetry, prose and drama, that deal with life on the land in a practical way\" (1). The georgic's most general conception as a kind of farming literature is useful to note when...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":23875,"journal":{"name":"Western American Literature","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western American Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wal.2024.a924879","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Young, Tough, Beautiful, and a Little Bit CrazyThe Forestry of Norman Maclean's Prose in USFS 1919: The Ranger, The Cook, and a Hole in the Sky
  • Thomas Kaye (bio)

"It's a swell book. What I couldn't ever understand was what good the sword would do. It would have to stay edge up all the time because if it went over flat you could roll right over it and it wouldn't make any trouble."

"It's a symbol," Bill said.

"Sure," said Nick, "but it isn't practical."

—Ernest Hemingway, "The Three-Day Blow," In Our Time

This article will examine the "world of the woods" that has, for so long, been relegated to the furthest of backdrops in studies of Norman Maclean's writing (Maclean, "An Incident" 120). The novella USFS 1919: The Ranger, The Cook, and a Hole in the Sky will be the sole focus in this reading of Maclean's woods. It is a world best studied by analyzing the forestry of Maclean's prose. This term—"the forestry of his prose"—denotes both his writing about forestry and his craft of writing prose as an art akin to forestry. Forest ecologist Hamish Kimmins begins his definition of forestry by describing it as "the art, science and practice of managing forested landscapes" (49). By reading for the forestry of Maclean's prose, then, I will explore the art that has sprung from managing forested landscapes.

In an interview with Studs Terkel in 1976 Maclean said of this world of the woods: "everything was hand and horse . . . it was a world that was infinitely beautiful and very tough, and it's hard at times to tell the toughness from the beauty, it was a tough kind of beauty" (00:03:07—00: 03:45). In this evocation of "a world of hand [End Page 349] and horse" Maclean's appreciation of skilled labor captures in miniature the complex relationship between beauty and utility that is at the heart of Maclean's forestry and a key concern of this article. With beauty and utility in mind, it should be noted that the forestry of Norman Maclean's prose does not necessarily involve descriptions of trees, but rather the hands-on business of working in the forest: a world of labor and social relationships.

In contemporary ecocriticism it might seem jarring to discuss the beauty inherent in utilizing the woods. The statement Maclean makes in his speech "An Incident" that "just watching a sawyer at work in the woods is . . . an art experience" (120) could appear horrifying to someone suffering from what Aldo Leopold describes as "one of the penalties of an ecological education . . . that one lives alone in a world of wounds" (197). Surely the sawyer is inflicting another wound (just as surely as the tree has fallen)? Until recently, part of the problem has been, as David Fairer describes when making the case for the eco-georgic, that "the ecocriticism of the past two decades [1990 to 2010] has tended to view the georgic as peripheral, even antagonistic, to 'green' principles" (202). This was due in part to what Fairer describes as "the monopolising grip of Romanticism" upon ecocriticism (203). Thus, beauty in a text like USFS 1919 that is georgic in its fascination with (as Maclean states) "what men and women could do with their hands and heads in the world of the woods" becomes a contentious subject ("An Incident," 120).

In his introduction to A History of English Georgic Writing, Paddy Bullard offers a succinct definition of the georgic split into "two broad categories" (1). Bullard describes the first as "a category of genre, made up by imitations and adaptations of Virgil's Georgics," the poem that, as Bullard states, "has lent its title most often as a general label for farming literature" (1). The second category of georgic is defined by Bullard as "one of theme and mode, and it covers all sorts of literary texts, in poetry, prose and drama, that deal with life on the land in a practical way" (1). The georgic's most general conception as a kind of farming literature is useful to note when...

年轻、坚韧、美丽、有点疯狂:1919 年美国联邦林业局的诺曼-麦克林散文集》(The Forestry of Norman Maclean's Prose in USFS 1919):护林员、厨师和天空中的一个洞
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 年轻、坚韧、美丽、有点疯狂--1919 年美国林业局中诺曼-麦克林的森林散文:护林员、厨师和天空中的一个洞 托马斯-凯伊(Thomas Kaye)(简历)"这是一本好书。我一直不明白的是,这把剑有什么用。它必须始终保持锋利 因为如果它被轧平了 你可以直接从它上面滚过去 它不会造成任何麻烦""这是一个象征,"比尔说。"当然,"尼克说,"但不实用。"-本文将探讨 "森林世界",长期以来,在诺曼-麦克林的写作研究中,"森林世界 "一直被置于最遥远的背景之下(麦克林,《一次事件》,120页)。长篇小说《USFS 1919》:护林员、厨师和天空中的一个洞》将是本文解读麦克林的唯一重点。通过分析麦克林散文中的森林,可以更好地研究这个世界。这个词--"他散文中的森林"--既指他关于森林的写作,也指他将散文写作作为一门类似于森林艺术的技艺。森林生态学家哈米什-金明斯(Hamish Kimmins)在给林业下定义时,首先将其描述为 "管理森林景观的艺术、科学和实践"(49)。通过阅读麦克林散文中的林业,我将探索管理森林景观所产生的艺术。在 1976 年接受 Studs Terkel 采访时,麦克林谈到了这个森林世界:"......这是一个无限美丽又非常坚韧的世界,有时很难将坚韧与美丽区分开来,这是一种坚韧的美"(00:03:07-00:03:45)。麦克林对熟练工人的赞赏,是对 "手[第 349 页完]和马的世界 "的唤起,也是对美与实用之间复杂关系的缩影,而这正是麦克林林业的核心,也是本文关注的重点。考虑到美与实用的关系,应该指出的是,诺曼-麦克林散文中的森林并不一定涉及对树木的描述,而是在森林中工作的实际业务:一个劳动和社会关系的世界。在当代生态批评中,讨论利用森林所蕴含的美可能显得有些生硬。麦克林在他的演讲 "一个事件 "中说,"仅仅观看一个锯木工人在树林里工作就是......一种艺术体验"(120),这对于一个患有奥尔多-利奥波德所说的 "生态教育的惩罚之一......就是一个人孤独地生活在一个充满伤痕的世界里"(197)的人来说,可能显得非常可怕。锯木工人肯定又造成了一个伤口(就像树倒了一样)?正如戴维-费勒(David Fairer)在论证生态格律时所描述的那样,直到最近,部分问题还在于 "过去二十年(1990 年至 2010 年)的生态批评倾向于将格律视为'绿色'原则的边缘,甚至是对立面"(202)。部分原因在于费勒所说的 "浪漫主义对生态批评的垄断"(203)。因此,像《1919 年美国联邦林业局》这样的文本中的美就成了一个有争议的话题("一个事件",120),因为这些文本具有地理学的魅力(正如麦克林所说),"男人和女人可以用他们的双手和头脑在森林世界中做些什么"。帕迪-布拉德(Paddy Bullard)在《英国格律体写作史》(A History of English Georgic Writing)一书的导言中给出了一个简洁的定义,将格律体分为 "两大类"(1)。布拉德将第一类描述为 "一种体裁,由对维吉尔的《格奥尔格》的模仿和改编构成",正如布拉德所说,这首诗 "最常被冠以农耕文学的总称"(1)。布拉德将 georgic 的第二类定义为 "主题和模式的一类,涵盖诗歌、散文和戏剧等各种以实用方式描写土地生活的文学文本"(1)。georgic 最一般的概念是一种农耕文学,这一点在......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western American Literature
Western American Literature LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信