{"title":"Gauge theory is about the geometry of internal spaces","authors":"Henrique Gomes","doi":"arxiv-2404.10461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general relativity, the strong equivalence principle is underpinned by a\ngeometrical interpretation of fields on spacetime: all fields and bodies probe\nthe same geometry. This geometric interpretation implies that the parallel\ntransport of all spacetime tensors and spinors is dictated by a single affine\nconnection. Can something similar be said about gauge theory? Agreed, in gauge\ntheory different symmetry groups rule the interactions of different types of\ncharges, so we cannot expect to find the same kind of universality found in the\ngravitational case. Nonetheless, the parallel transport of all the fields that\nare charged under the same symmetry group is dictated by a single 'gauge\nconnection', and they all transform jointly under a gauge transformation. Is\nthis kind of 'restricted universality' as geometrically underpinned as in\ngeneral relativity? Here I argue that it is. The key difference is that the\ngauge geometry concerns 'internal', as opposed to 'external', spaces. The gauge\nsymmetry of the standard model is thus understood as merely the automorphism\ngroup of an internal geometric structure -- $C^3\\otimes C^2\\otimes C^1$ endowed\nwith an orientation and canonical inner product -- in the same way as spacetime\nsymmetries (such as Poincare transformations), are understood as the\nautomorphism group of an external geometric structure (respectively, a\nMinkowski metric). And the Ehresmann connection can then be understood as\ndetermining parallelism for this internal geometry.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"232 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.10461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In general relativity, the strong equivalence principle is underpinned by a
geometrical interpretation of fields on spacetime: all fields and bodies probe
the same geometry. This geometric interpretation implies that the parallel
transport of all spacetime tensors and spinors is dictated by a single affine
connection. Can something similar be said about gauge theory? Agreed, in gauge
theory different symmetry groups rule the interactions of different types of
charges, so we cannot expect to find the same kind of universality found in the
gravitational case. Nonetheless, the parallel transport of all the fields that
are charged under the same symmetry group is dictated by a single 'gauge
connection', and they all transform jointly under a gauge transformation. Is
this kind of 'restricted universality' as geometrically underpinned as in
general relativity? Here I argue that it is. The key difference is that the
gauge geometry concerns 'internal', as opposed to 'external', spaces. The gauge
symmetry of the standard model is thus understood as merely the automorphism
group of an internal geometric structure -- $C^3\otimes C^2\otimes C^1$ endowed
with an orientation and canonical inner product -- in the same way as spacetime
symmetries (such as Poincare transformations), are understood as the
automorphism group of an external geometric structure (respectively, a
Minkowski metric). And the Ehresmann connection can then be understood as
determining parallelism for this internal geometry.