A. M. Pitera, V. K. Heinen, J. F. Welklin, C. L. Branch, B. R. Sonnenberg, L. M. Benedict, E. S. Bridge, V. V. Pravosudov
{"title":"Spatiotemporal variation in cognitive phenotype, social network position, and distribution of social associations in a food-caching bird","authors":"A. M. Pitera, V. K. Heinen, J. F. Welklin, C. L. Branch, B. R. Sonnenberg, L. M. Benedict, E. S. Bridge, V. V. Pravosudov","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03466-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Phenotypic variation may influence social structure if animals associate nonrandomly based on phenotypic traits. For animals that rely on cognition for survival, variation in cognitive ability may also affect social structure. Individuals with worse cognitive abilities could benefit from preferentially associating with conspecifics with better cognition, from being more gregarious, or both, allowing them access to resources. Climatic conditions influence resource availability, which may also affect the relative benefits of assortment or gregariousness, resulting in spatiotemporal variation of social patterns. Using 5 years of data, we investigated assortment by spatial cognitive ability and associations between sociality and spatial cognition in food-caching mountain chickadees, <i>Poecile gambeli</i>, inhabiting harsher environments at higher elevations and milder environments at lower elevations. Elevation environments differ in overwinter severity and in the harshest winter, high elevation chickadees with better spatial learning and memory abilities were less gregarious and showed lower social differentiation (or choosiness) than those with worse spatial learning and memory abilities but did not assort based on these traits. In two other seasons, including the second harshest winter, high elevation chickadees that were less cognitively flexible showed more social differentiation than those that were more cognitively flexible. In these two seasons alone, chickadees negatively assorted by spatial learning and memory performance. Chickadees from low elevations only demonstrated negative assortment in the second harshest winter. All other results were nonsignificant, suggesting that overall, individual spatial cognitive abilities or those of their associates have little influence on social preferences.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Significance statement</h3><p>We showed that under certain environmental conditions, social behavior may be related to spatial cognitive abilities in mountain chickadees that rely heavily on spatial cognition for overwinter survival, but that overall, cognition does not appear to influence social behavior. In the few years that patterns were present, they fit three trends: 1) chickadees with worse spatial cognitive abilities were more gregarious; 2) chickadees with worse spatial cognitive abilities were choosier; and/or 3) chickadees had stronger associations with social partners that had spatial cognitive abilities that differed from their own and weaker associations with those of similar cognitive abilities. While it is unclear under which specific circumstances these patterns emerge, they coincided with extreme snowfall, suggesting that individuals with worse spatial cognition alter their social behavior to buffer against their relatively greater risk of starvation under extenuating circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03466-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phenotypic variation may influence social structure if animals associate nonrandomly based on phenotypic traits. For animals that rely on cognition for survival, variation in cognitive ability may also affect social structure. Individuals with worse cognitive abilities could benefit from preferentially associating with conspecifics with better cognition, from being more gregarious, or both, allowing them access to resources. Climatic conditions influence resource availability, which may also affect the relative benefits of assortment or gregariousness, resulting in spatiotemporal variation of social patterns. Using 5 years of data, we investigated assortment by spatial cognitive ability and associations between sociality and spatial cognition in food-caching mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli, inhabiting harsher environments at higher elevations and milder environments at lower elevations. Elevation environments differ in overwinter severity and in the harshest winter, high elevation chickadees with better spatial learning and memory abilities were less gregarious and showed lower social differentiation (or choosiness) than those with worse spatial learning and memory abilities but did not assort based on these traits. In two other seasons, including the second harshest winter, high elevation chickadees that were less cognitively flexible showed more social differentiation than those that were more cognitively flexible. In these two seasons alone, chickadees negatively assorted by spatial learning and memory performance. Chickadees from low elevations only demonstrated negative assortment in the second harshest winter. All other results were nonsignificant, suggesting that overall, individual spatial cognitive abilities or those of their associates have little influence on social preferences.
Significance statement
We showed that under certain environmental conditions, social behavior may be related to spatial cognitive abilities in mountain chickadees that rely heavily on spatial cognition for overwinter survival, but that overall, cognition does not appear to influence social behavior. In the few years that patterns were present, they fit three trends: 1) chickadees with worse spatial cognitive abilities were more gregarious; 2) chickadees with worse spatial cognitive abilities were choosier; and/or 3) chickadees had stronger associations with social partners that had spatial cognitive abilities that differed from their own and weaker associations with those of similar cognitive abilities. While it is unclear under which specific circumstances these patterns emerge, they coincided with extreme snowfall, suggesting that individuals with worse spatial cognition alter their social behavior to buffer against their relatively greater risk of starvation under extenuating circumstances.
期刊介绍：
The journal publishes reviews, original contributions and commentaries dealing with quantitative empirical and theoretical studies in the analysis of animal behavior at the level of the individual, group, population, community, and species.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
