X Bai, A Loarte, Y Q Liu, S D Pinches, F Koechl, L Li, M Dubrov, Y Gribov
{"title":"Impact of increasing plasma-wall gap on plasma response to RMP fields in ITER","authors":"X Bai, A Loarte, Y Q Liu, S D Pinches, F Koechl, L Li, M Dubrov, Y Gribov","doi":"10.1088/1361-6587/ad3aa0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of increasing plasma-wall gap on controlling edge-localized modes (ELMs) is numerically evaluated for the ITER 5 MA/2.65 T H-mode scenarios with full tungsten wall, based on the MARS-F computed plasma response to the applied <italic toggle=\"yes\">n</italic>= 3–5 (<italic toggle=\"yes\">n</italic> is the toroidal mode number) resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) fields. Three new scenarios, referred to as standard, clearance and outergap, are considered assuming different plasma-wall gap sizes over a range on which vertically stability can be maintained by in-vessel coils in ITER. The latter are shown to have both direct and indirect effects on the plasma response and hence ELM control in ITER. The indirect and also primary influence occurs via change of the equilibrium edge safety factor <italic toggle=\"yes\">q<sub>95</sub>\n</italic>, which decreases with increasing the plasma-wall gap (at fixed plasma current and toroidal field), leading to a multi-peaking structure in the plasma response as measured by the plasma displacement near the X-point or the edge-localized resonant radial magnetic field perturbation. The direct, albeit secondary effect, is the reduction of local peak amplitudes with increasing the plasma-wall gap thus weakening the RMP field efficiency for ELM control with a given current in the control coils. A slight reduction of the plasma current, from 5 MA to 4.77, 4.92 and 4.65 MA for the standard, clearance and outergap scenarios, respectively, is found to be sufficient to access the <italic toggle=\"yes\">q</italic>\n<sub>95</sub> window for the best ELM control with the <italic toggle=\"yes\">n</italic>= 3 RMP. The <italic toggle=\"yes\">n</italic>= 4 coil current configuration with the <italic toggle=\"yes\">n</italic>= 5 sideband is also found favorable for ELM control in ITER, by producing RMP fields with mixed toroidal spectra compared to <italic toggle=\"yes\">n</italic> = 3.","PeriodicalId":20239,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad3aa0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The impact of increasing plasma-wall gap on controlling edge-localized modes (ELMs) is numerically evaluated for the ITER 5 MA/2.65 T H-mode scenarios with full tungsten wall, based on the MARS-F computed plasma response to the applied n= 3–5 (n is the toroidal mode number) resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) fields. Three new scenarios, referred to as standard, clearance and outergap, are considered assuming different plasma-wall gap sizes over a range on which vertically stability can be maintained by in-vessel coils in ITER. The latter are shown to have both direct and indirect effects on the plasma response and hence ELM control in ITER. The indirect and also primary influence occurs via change of the equilibrium edge safety factor q95, which decreases with increasing the plasma-wall gap (at fixed plasma current and toroidal field), leading to a multi-peaking structure in the plasma response as measured by the plasma displacement near the X-point or the edge-localized resonant radial magnetic field perturbation. The direct, albeit secondary effect, is the reduction of local peak amplitudes with increasing the plasma-wall gap thus weakening the RMP field efficiency for ELM control with a given current in the control coils. A slight reduction of the plasma current, from 5 MA to 4.77, 4.92 and 4.65 MA for the standard, clearance and outergap scenarios, respectively, is found to be sufficient to access the q95 window for the best ELM control with the n= 3 RMP. The n= 4 coil current configuration with the n= 5 sideband is also found favorable for ELM control in ITER, by producing RMP fields with mixed toroidal spectra compared to n = 3.
期刊介绍:
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion covers all aspects of the physics of hot, highly ionised plasmas. This includes results of current experimental and theoretical research on all aspects of the physics of high-temperature plasmas and of controlled nuclear fusion, including the basic phenomena in highly-ionised gases in the laboratory, in the ionosphere and in space, in magnetic-confinement and inertial-confinement fusion as well as related diagnostic methods.
Papers with a technological emphasis, for example in such topics as plasma control, fusion technology and diagnostics, are welcomed when the plasma physics is an integral part of the paper or when the technology is unique to plasma applications or new to the field of plasma physics. Papers on dusty plasma physics are welcome when there is a clear relevance to fusion.