A Comparative Study and Systematic Analysis of XAI Models and their Applications in Healthcare

IF 9.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jyoti Gupta, K. R. Seeja
{"title":"A Comparative Study and Systematic Analysis of XAI Models and their Applications in Healthcare","authors":"Jyoti Gupta,&nbsp;K. R. Seeja","doi":"10.1007/s11831-024-10103-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence technologies such as machine learning and deep learning employ techniques to anticipate results more effectively without human involvement. Since AI models are viewed as opaque models, their application in healthcare is still restricted. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been designed to increase the use of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in the healthcare sector by increasing trust in the model's predictions and explaining how they are developed. The aim of this article is to critically review, compare, and summarize existing research and to find new research possibilities of XAI for applications in healthcare. This study is conducted by finding articles related to XAI in biological and healthcare domains from the PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases using the PRISMA method. A comparative study of the state-of-the-art XAI techniques to evaluate its applications in healthcare has also been done using an experimental demonstration on the Diabetes dataset. XAI techniques, namely LIME, SHAP, PDP, and decision tree, were used to explain how various input attributes contributed to the outcome of the model. This study found that the explanations provided by these models are not easily understandable for different users of the model, like doctors and patients, and need expertise. This study found that the potential of XAI in the medical domain is high as it increases trust in the AI model. This survey will motivate the researchers to build more XAI techniques that provide user-friendly explanations, especially for the less explored areas of medical data, such as biomedical signals and biomedical text.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"31 7","pages":"3977 - 4002"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-024-10103-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technologies such as machine learning and deep learning employ techniques to anticipate results more effectively without human involvement. Since AI models are viewed as opaque models, their application in healthcare is still restricted. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been designed to increase the use of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in the healthcare sector by increasing trust in the model's predictions and explaining how they are developed. The aim of this article is to critically review, compare, and summarize existing research and to find new research possibilities of XAI for applications in healthcare. This study is conducted by finding articles related to XAI in biological and healthcare domains from the PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases using the PRISMA method. A comparative study of the state-of-the-art XAI techniques to evaluate its applications in healthcare has also been done using an experimental demonstration on the Diabetes dataset. XAI techniques, namely LIME, SHAP, PDP, and decision tree, were used to explain how various input attributes contributed to the outcome of the model. This study found that the explanations provided by these models are not easily understandable for different users of the model, like doctors and patients, and need expertise. This study found that the potential of XAI in the medical domain is high as it increases trust in the AI model. This survey will motivate the researchers to build more XAI techniques that provide user-friendly explanations, especially for the less explored areas of medical data, such as biomedical signals and biomedical text.

Abstract Image

XAI 模型及其在医疗保健领域应用的比较研究和系统分析
机器学习和深度学习等人工智能技术采用了无需人工参与即可更有效地预测结果的技术。由于人工智能模型被视为不透明模型,其在医疗保健领域的应用仍然受到限制。可解释的人工智能(XAI)旨在通过增加对模型预测的信任并解释其开发过程,从而提高人工智能(AI)算法在医疗保健领域的应用。本文旨在对现有研究进行批判性回顾、比较和总结,并为 XAI 在医疗保健领域的应用寻找新的研究可能性。本研究采用 PRISMA 方法,从 PubMed、Science Direct 和 Web of Science 数据库中查找生物和医疗保健领域与 XAI 相关的文章。此外,还通过糖尿病数据集的实验演示,对最先进的 XAI 技术进行了比较研究,以评估其在医疗保健领域的应用。XAI 技术,即 LIME、SHAP、PDP 和决策树,被用来解释各种输入属性如何对模型结果做出贡献。这项研究发现,这些模型所提供的解释对模型的不同用户(如医生和患者)来说并不容易理解,而且需要专业知识。本研究发现,XAI 在医疗领域的潜力很大,因为它能增加对人工智能模型的信任。这项调查将激励研究人员建立更多的 XAI 技术,以提供用户友好的解释,特别是针对医疗数据中探索较少的领域,如生物医学信号和生物医学文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aim and Scope: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication. Review Format: Reviews published in the journal offer: A survey of current literature Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信