Effects of performance‐based financing on availability, quality, and use of family planning services in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An Impact Evaluation

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Salomé Henriette Paulette Drouard, Stephan Brenner, Delphin Antwisi, Ndeye Khady Toure, Supriya Madhavan, Günther Fink, Gil Shapira
{"title":"Effects of performance‐based financing on availability, quality, and use of family planning services in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An Impact Evaluation","authors":"Salomé Henriette Paulette Drouard, Stephan Brenner, Delphin Antwisi, Ndeye Khady Toure, Supriya Madhavan, Günther Fink, Gil Shapira","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to high‐quality family planning services remains limited in many low‐ and middle‐income countries, resulting in a high burden of unintended pregnancies and adverse health outcomes. We used data from a large randomized controlled trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo to test whether performance‐based financing (PBF) can increase the availability, quality, and use of family planning services. Starting at the end of 2016, 30 health zones were randomly assigned to a PBF program, in which health facilities received financing conditional on the quantity and quality of offered services. Twenty‐eight health zones were assigned to a control group in which health facilities received unconditional financing of a similar magnitude. Follow‐up data collection took place in 2021–2022 and included 346 health facility assessments, 476 direct clinical observations of family planning consultations, and 9,585 household surveys. Findings from multivariable regression models show that the PBF program had strong positive impacts on the availability and quality of family planning services. Specifically, the program increased the likelihood that health facilities offered any family planning services by 20 percentage points and increased the likelihood that health facilities had contraceptive pills, injectables, and implants available by 23, 24, and 20 percentage points, respectively. The program also improved the process quality of family planning consultations by 0.59 standard deviations. Despite these improvements, and in addition to reductions in service fees, the program had a modest impact on contraceptive use, increasing the modern method use among sexually active women of reproductive age by 4 percentage points (equivalent to a 37 percent increase), with no significant impact on adolescent contraceptive use. These results suggest that although PBF can be an effective approach for improving the supply of family planning services, complementary demand‐side interventions are likely needed in a setting with very low baseline utilization.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to high‐quality family planning services remains limited in many low‐ and middle‐income countries, resulting in a high burden of unintended pregnancies and adverse health outcomes. We used data from a large randomized controlled trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo to test whether performance‐based financing (PBF) can increase the availability, quality, and use of family planning services. Starting at the end of 2016, 30 health zones were randomly assigned to a PBF program, in which health facilities received financing conditional on the quantity and quality of offered services. Twenty‐eight health zones were assigned to a control group in which health facilities received unconditional financing of a similar magnitude. Follow‐up data collection took place in 2021–2022 and included 346 health facility assessments, 476 direct clinical observations of family planning consultations, and 9,585 household surveys. Findings from multivariable regression models show that the PBF program had strong positive impacts on the availability and quality of family planning services. Specifically, the program increased the likelihood that health facilities offered any family planning services by 20 percentage points and increased the likelihood that health facilities had contraceptive pills, injectables, and implants available by 23, 24, and 20 percentage points, respectively. The program also improved the process quality of family planning consultations by 0.59 standard deviations. Despite these improvements, and in addition to reductions in service fees, the program had a modest impact on contraceptive use, increasing the modern method use among sexually active women of reproductive age by 4 percentage points (equivalent to a 37 percent increase), with no significant impact on adolescent contraceptive use. These results suggest that although PBF can be an effective approach for improving the supply of family planning services, complementary demand‐side interventions are likely needed in a setting with very low baseline utilization.
基于绩效的融资对刚果民主共和国计划生育服务的可用性、质量和使用的影响:影响评估
在许多中低收入国家,获得高质量计划生育服务的机会仍然有限,导致意外怀孕和不良健康后果的负担沉重。我们利用刚果民主共和国一项大型随机对照试验的数据,检验了基于绩效的融资(PBF)能否提高计划生育服务的可用性、质量和使用率。从 2016 年底开始,30 个卫生区被随机分配到一个 PBF 项目中,在该项目中,卫生设施获得资助的条件是所提供服务的数量和质量。28 个卫生区被分配到对照组,在对照组中,医疗机构获得类似规模的无条件资助。后续数据收集工作于 2021-2022 年进行,包括 346 次医疗机构评估、476 次计划生育咨询的直接临床观察和 9585 次家庭调查。多变量回归模型的研究结果表明,"计划生育家庭基金 "项目对计划生育服务的可用性和质量产生了巨大的积极影响。具体而言,该计划将医疗机构提供任何计划生育服务的可能性提高了 20 个百分点,将医疗机构提供避孕药、注射剂和皮下埋植剂的可能性分别提高了 23、24 和 20 个百分点。该计划还将计划生育咨询的过程质量提高了 0.59 个标准差。尽管有了这些改进,而且服务费也有所降低,但该计划对避孕药具使用率的影响不大,育龄性活跃妇女的现代避孕方法使用率提高了 4 个百分点(相当于提高了 37%),但对青少年避孕药具使用率的影响不大。这些结果表明,尽管 PBF 是改善计划生育服务供应的有效方法,但在基线使用率非常低的情况下,很可能需要辅助性的需求方干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信