Acculturation and breast cancer screening in Latina women: Unraveling reasons for mixed results over 44 years of research

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Lydia P. Buki , Hsin-Ya Liao , Yadira Montoya , Robert K. Sommer , Cristalís Capielo Rosario , Bryana H. French , Tiffany McCaughey
{"title":"Acculturation and breast cancer screening in Latina women: Unraveling reasons for mixed results over 44 years of research","authors":"Lydia P. Buki ,&nbsp;Hsin-Ya Liao ,&nbsp;Yadira Montoya ,&nbsp;Robert K. Sommer ,&nbsp;Cristalís Capielo Rosario ,&nbsp;Bryana H. French ,&nbsp;Tiffany McCaughey","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the quest to identify factors that contribute to health disparities in Latina women, acculturation has been examined as a correlate of breast cancer screening. Results have been equivocal, showing no relation, a positive, or a negative relation. In this article, we examined reports of this association over a span of 44 years (1980–2023) to identify reasons for inconsistent results across studies, deriving implications and recommendations for theory building and research. A comprehensive PRISMA review yielded 44 empirical articles with a total sample of over 32,130 Latina women. Through a rigorous process, we uncovered how acculturation has been conceptualized and measured, as well as the nature of the association between acculturation and breast cancer screening across studies. In the 43 studies for which information was available, acculturation was measured 35 different ways. Only seven articles included a definition of acculturation and a conceptualization linking the construct to screening. Findings were mixed; the highest proportion of studies showed no link across constructs. Inconsistent results may be due to (a) a lack of clear definitions or conceptualizations, (b) the use of proxies and unilinear measures, (c) the use of modified and unvalidated measures, and (d) large sample variation across age, ancestry, and geographic location. Given inconsistent findings, no definitive conclusions can be made regarding the association between acculturation and screening behaviors. Results suggest that in future studies, acculturation should be measured as a latent construct with a greater focus on structural factors that may contribute to low screening rates</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 101974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the quest to identify factors that contribute to health disparities in Latina women, acculturation has been examined as a correlate of breast cancer screening. Results have been equivocal, showing no relation, a positive, or a negative relation. In this article, we examined reports of this association over a span of 44 years (1980–2023) to identify reasons for inconsistent results across studies, deriving implications and recommendations for theory building and research. A comprehensive PRISMA review yielded 44 empirical articles with a total sample of over 32,130 Latina women. Through a rigorous process, we uncovered how acculturation has been conceptualized and measured, as well as the nature of the association between acculturation and breast cancer screening across studies. In the 43 studies for which information was available, acculturation was measured 35 different ways. Only seven articles included a definition of acculturation and a conceptualization linking the construct to screening. Findings were mixed; the highest proportion of studies showed no link across constructs. Inconsistent results may be due to (a) a lack of clear definitions or conceptualizations, (b) the use of proxies and unilinear measures, (c) the use of modified and unvalidated measures, and (d) large sample variation across age, ancestry, and geographic location. Given inconsistent findings, no definitive conclusions can be made regarding the association between acculturation and screening behaviors. Results suggest that in future studies, acculturation should be measured as a latent construct with a greater focus on structural factors that may contribute to low screening rates

拉丁裔妇女的文化适应与乳腺癌筛查:揭示 44 年研究结果喜忧参半的原因
为了找出造成拉丁裔女性健康差异的因素,人们研究了文化程度与乳腺癌筛查的相关性。研究结果模棱两可,有的显示与乳腺癌筛查无关,有的显示与乳腺癌筛查呈正相关,有的则显示与乳腺癌筛查呈负相关。在本文中,我们研究了 44 年间(1980-2023 年)有关这种关联的报告,以找出不同研究结果不一致的原因,并为理论建设和研究提出影响和建议。通过全面的 PRISMA 审查,我们获得了 44 篇实证文章,样本总数超过 32,130 名拉丁裔女性。通过严格的程序,我们揭示了文化适应性的概念和测量方法,以及不同研究中文化适应性与乳腺癌筛查之间关联的性质。在有资料可查的 43 项研究中,文化程度有 35 种不同的测量方法。只有七篇文章包含了文化程度的定义以及将文化程度与筛查联系起来的概念。研究结果喜忧参半;比例最高的研究显示,不同构念之间没有联系。结果不一致的原因可能是:(a) 缺乏明确的定义或概念;(b) 使用了代用指标和单线性测量方法;(c) 使用了经过修改和未经验证的测量方法;(d) 不同年龄、血统和地理位置的样本差异较大。由于研究结果不一致,因此无法就文化适应与筛查行为之间的关系得出明确结论。研究结果表明,在今后的研究中,文化程度应作为一个潜在的概念来衡量,并更多地关注可能导致筛查率低的结构性因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信