Lydia P. Buki , Hsin-Ya Liao , Yadira Montoya , Robert K. Sommer , Cristalís Capielo Rosario , Bryana H. French , Tiffany McCaughey
{"title":"Acculturation and breast cancer screening in Latina women: Unraveling reasons for mixed results over 44 years of research","authors":"Lydia P. Buki , Hsin-Ya Liao , Yadira Montoya , Robert K. Sommer , Cristalís Capielo Rosario , Bryana H. French , Tiffany McCaughey","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the quest to identify factors that contribute to health disparities in Latina women, acculturation has been examined as a correlate of breast cancer screening. Results have been equivocal, showing no relation, a positive, or a negative relation. In this article, we examined reports of this association over a span of 44 years (1980–2023) to identify reasons for inconsistent results across studies, deriving implications and recommendations for theory building and research. A comprehensive PRISMA review yielded 44 empirical articles with a total sample of over 32,130 Latina women. Through a rigorous process, we uncovered how acculturation has been conceptualized and measured, as well as the nature of the association between acculturation and breast cancer screening across studies. In the 43 studies for which information was available, acculturation was measured 35 different ways. Only seven articles included a definition of acculturation and a conceptualization linking the construct to screening. Findings were mixed; the highest proportion of studies showed no link across constructs. Inconsistent results may be due to (a) a lack of clear definitions or conceptualizations, (b) the use of proxies and unilinear measures, (c) the use of modified and unvalidated measures, and (d) large sample variation across age, ancestry, and geographic location. Given inconsistent findings, no definitive conclusions can be made regarding the association between acculturation and screening behaviors. Results suggest that in future studies, acculturation should be measured as a latent construct with a greater focus on structural factors that may contribute to low screening rates</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 101974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the quest to identify factors that contribute to health disparities in Latina women, acculturation has been examined as a correlate of breast cancer screening. Results have been equivocal, showing no relation, a positive, or a negative relation. In this article, we examined reports of this association over a span of 44 years (1980–2023) to identify reasons for inconsistent results across studies, deriving implications and recommendations for theory building and research. A comprehensive PRISMA review yielded 44 empirical articles with a total sample of over 32,130 Latina women. Through a rigorous process, we uncovered how acculturation has been conceptualized and measured, as well as the nature of the association between acculturation and breast cancer screening across studies. In the 43 studies for which information was available, acculturation was measured 35 different ways. Only seven articles included a definition of acculturation and a conceptualization linking the construct to screening. Findings were mixed; the highest proportion of studies showed no link across constructs. Inconsistent results may be due to (a) a lack of clear definitions or conceptualizations, (b) the use of proxies and unilinear measures, (c) the use of modified and unvalidated measures, and (d) large sample variation across age, ancestry, and geographic location. Given inconsistent findings, no definitive conclusions can be made regarding the association between acculturation and screening behaviors. Results suggest that in future studies, acculturation should be measured as a latent construct with a greater focus on structural factors that may contribute to low screening rates
期刊介绍:
IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.