Revisiting relational-based ordinal classification methods from a more flexible conception of characteristic profiles

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Raymundo Diaz , Eduardo Fernández , José Rui Figueira , Jorge Navarro , Efrain Solares
{"title":"Revisiting relational-based ordinal classification methods from a more flexible conception of characteristic profiles","authors":"Raymundo Diaz ,&nbsp;Eduardo Fernández ,&nbsp;José Rui Figueira ,&nbsp;Jorge Navarro ,&nbsp;Efrain Solares","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the main ways to represent classes in multiple criteria ordinal classification is using <em>characteristic</em> profiles, conceived as typical actions of their respective class. In this paper, our primary focus is on deepening and making more flexible this concept. We propose a new relational-based ordinal classification method, in which profiles can be extended to be more general assignment examples, belonging to the “least preferred” and the “most preferred” preference part of each class, even belonging to the limiting boundaries between adjacent classes. Preferences are modeled by a general reflexive relation. The novel method provides a systematic framework for refining and improving both the reference set and the preference relation model. This proposal helps bridge the gap between different paradigms in relational multiple criteria ordinal classification. The method's remarkable adaptability in handling reference actions, combined with the general feature of the preference relation, distinguishes it from existing ordinal classification methods, which can be considered particular cases of this comprehensive approach. Not only it is a theoretical improvement, but it is also relevant from a practical standpoint because it allows for a greater number of assignment examples to provide a better characterization of classes and more appropriate assignments, as well as reduces the cognitive effort demanded from decision makers. The new approach offers a way to use the enhanced information provided by the increased number of profiles to help Decision-Makers to choose the final category. The proposal is illustrated with several simple examples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main ways to represent classes in multiple criteria ordinal classification is using characteristic profiles, conceived as typical actions of their respective class. In this paper, our primary focus is on deepening and making more flexible this concept. We propose a new relational-based ordinal classification method, in which profiles can be extended to be more general assignment examples, belonging to the “least preferred” and the “most preferred” preference part of each class, even belonging to the limiting boundaries between adjacent classes. Preferences are modeled by a general reflexive relation. The novel method provides a systematic framework for refining and improving both the reference set and the preference relation model. This proposal helps bridge the gap between different paradigms in relational multiple criteria ordinal classification. The method's remarkable adaptability in handling reference actions, combined with the general feature of the preference relation, distinguishes it from existing ordinal classification methods, which can be considered particular cases of this comprehensive approach. Not only it is a theoretical improvement, but it is also relevant from a practical standpoint because it allows for a greater number of assignment examples to provide a better characterization of classes and more appropriate assignments, as well as reduces the cognitive effort demanded from decision makers. The new approach offers a way to use the enhanced information provided by the increased number of profiles to help Decision-Makers to choose the final category. The proposal is illustrated with several simple examples.

从更灵活的特征轮廓概念出发,重新审视基于关系的序数分类方法
在多标准序数分类法中,表示类别的主要方法之一是使用特征轮廓,将其视为各自类别的典型行为。在本文中,我们的主要重点是深化这一概念并使其更加灵活。我们提出了一种新的基于关系的序数分类方法,在这种方法中,特征轮廓可以扩展为更一般的分配示例,属于每个类别的 "最不偏好 "和 "最偏好 "偏好部分,甚至属于相邻类别之间的限制边界。偏好是通过一般的反向关系来建模的。新方法为完善和改进参考集和偏好关系模型提供了一个系统框架。该建议有助于弥合关系式多标准序数分类中不同范式之间的差距。该方法在处理参考行为时具有显著的适应性,再加上偏好关系的一般特征,使其有别于现有的序数分类方法,而现有的序数分类方法可以被视为这种综合方法的特殊案例。这不仅是一种理论上的改进,而且从实用角度来看也很有意义,因为它允许使用更多的赋值示例来提供更好的类别特征和更合适的赋值,同时还能减少决策者的认知努力。新方法提供了一种方法,可以利用更多实例提供的更多信息来帮助决策者选择最终类别。我们将用几个简单的例子来说明这一建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信