{"title":"Revisiting relational-based ordinal classification methods from a more flexible conception of characteristic profiles","authors":"Raymundo Diaz , Eduardo Fernández , José Rui Figueira , Jorge Navarro , Efrain Solares","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the main ways to represent classes in multiple criteria ordinal classification is using <em>characteristic</em> profiles, conceived as typical actions of their respective class. In this paper, our primary focus is on deepening and making more flexible this concept. We propose a new relational-based ordinal classification method, in which profiles can be extended to be more general assignment examples, belonging to the “least preferred” and the “most preferred” preference part of each class, even belonging to the limiting boundaries between adjacent classes. Preferences are modeled by a general reflexive relation. The novel method provides a systematic framework for refining and improving both the reference set and the preference relation model. This proposal helps bridge the gap between different paradigms in relational multiple criteria ordinal classification. The method's remarkable adaptability in handling reference actions, combined with the general feature of the preference relation, distinguishes it from existing ordinal classification methods, which can be considered particular cases of this comprehensive approach. Not only it is a theoretical improvement, but it is also relevant from a practical standpoint because it allows for a greater number of assignment examples to provide a better characterization of classes and more appropriate assignments, as well as reduces the cognitive effort demanded from decision makers. The new approach offers a way to use the enhanced information provided by the increased number of profiles to help Decision-Makers to choose the final category. The proposal is illustrated with several simple examples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One of the main ways to represent classes in multiple criteria ordinal classification is using characteristic profiles, conceived as typical actions of their respective class. In this paper, our primary focus is on deepening and making more flexible this concept. We propose a new relational-based ordinal classification method, in which profiles can be extended to be more general assignment examples, belonging to the “least preferred” and the “most preferred” preference part of each class, even belonging to the limiting boundaries between adjacent classes. Preferences are modeled by a general reflexive relation. The novel method provides a systematic framework for refining and improving both the reference set and the preference relation model. This proposal helps bridge the gap between different paradigms in relational multiple criteria ordinal classification. The method's remarkable adaptability in handling reference actions, combined with the general feature of the preference relation, distinguishes it from existing ordinal classification methods, which can be considered particular cases of this comprehensive approach. Not only it is a theoretical improvement, but it is also relevant from a practical standpoint because it allows for a greater number of assignment examples to provide a better characterization of classes and more appropriate assignments, as well as reduces the cognitive effort demanded from decision makers. The new approach offers a way to use the enhanced information provided by the increased number of profiles to help Decision-Makers to choose the final category. The proposal is illustrated with several simple examples.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.