A Randomized Evaluation of MoodFX, a Patient-Centred e-Health Tool to Support Outcome Measurement for Depression: Une évaluation randomisée de MoodFX, un outil de santé en ligne centré sur le patient pour soutenir la mesure du résultat dans la dépression.

Victor W. Li, Jaspreet Sahota, Deea K. Dev, Dib D. Gill, Vanessa C. Evans, Auby Axler, Trisha Chakrabarty, André Do, Kamyar Keramatian, John-Jose Nunez, Edwin M. Tam, Lakshmi N. Yatham, Erin E. Michalak, Jill K. Murphy, Raymond W. Lam
{"title":"A Randomized Evaluation of MoodFX, a Patient-Centred e-Health Tool to Support Outcome Measurement for Depression: Une évaluation randomisée de MoodFX, un outil de santé en ligne centré sur le patient pour soutenir la mesure du résultat dans la dépression.","authors":"Victor W. Li, Jaspreet Sahota, Deea K. Dev, Dib D. Gill, Vanessa C. Evans, Auby Axler, Trisha Chakrabarty, André Do, Kamyar Keramatian, John-Jose Nunez, Edwin M. Tam, Lakshmi N. Yatham, Erin E. Michalak, Jill K. Murphy, Raymond W. Lam","doi":"10.1177/07067437241245331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounde-Health tools using validated questionnaires to assess outcomes may facilitate measurement-based care for psychiatric disorders. MoodFX was created as a free online symptom tracker to support patients for outcome measurement in their depression treatment. We conducted a pilot randomized evaluation to examine its usability, and clinical utility.MethodsPatients presenting with a major depressive episode (within a major depressive or bipolar disorder) were randomly assigned to receive either MoodFX or a health information website as the intervention and control condition, respectively, with follow-up assessment surveys conducted online at baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months. The primary usability outcomes included the percentage of patients with self-reported use of MoodFX 3 or more times during follow up (indicating minimally adequate usage) and usability measures based on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Secondary clinical outcomes included the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Rated (QIDS-SR) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).ResultsForty-nine participants were randomized (24 to MoodFX and 25 to the control condition). Of the 23 participants randomized to MoodFX who completed the user survey, 18 (78%) used MoodFX 3 or more times over the 6 months of the study. The mean SUS score of 72.7 (65th–69th percentile) represents good usability. Compared to the control group, the MoodFX group had significantly better improvement on QIDS-SR and PHQ-9 scores, with large effect sizes and higher response rates at 6 months. There were no differences between conditions on other secondary outcomes such as functioning and quality of life.ConclusionMoodFX demonstrated good usability and was associated with reduction in depressive symptoms. This pilot study supports the use of digital tools in depression treatment.","PeriodicalId":519224,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437241245331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounde-Health tools using validated questionnaires to assess outcomes may facilitate measurement-based care for psychiatric disorders. MoodFX was created as a free online symptom tracker to support patients for outcome measurement in their depression treatment. We conducted a pilot randomized evaluation to examine its usability, and clinical utility.MethodsPatients presenting with a major depressive episode (within a major depressive or bipolar disorder) were randomly assigned to receive either MoodFX or a health information website as the intervention and control condition, respectively, with follow-up assessment surveys conducted online at baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months. The primary usability outcomes included the percentage of patients with self-reported use of MoodFX 3 or more times during follow up (indicating minimally adequate usage) and usability measures based on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Secondary clinical outcomes included the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Rated (QIDS-SR) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).ResultsForty-nine participants were randomized (24 to MoodFX and 25 to the control condition). Of the 23 participants randomized to MoodFX who completed the user survey, 18 (78%) used MoodFX 3 or more times over the 6 months of the study. The mean SUS score of 72.7 (65th–69th percentile) represents good usability. Compared to the control group, the MoodFX group had significantly better improvement on QIDS-SR and PHQ-9 scores, with large effect sizes and higher response rates at 6 months. There were no differences between conditions on other secondary outcomes such as functioning and quality of life.ConclusionMoodFX demonstrated good usability and was associated with reduction in depressive symptoms. This pilot study supports the use of digital tools in depression treatment.
以患者为中心的电子健康工具 MoodFX 的随机评估:MoodFX 是一种以患者为中心的电子健康工具,用于支持抑郁症的结果测量。
背景使用经过验证的问卷来评估结果的健康工具可以促进基于测量的精神疾病护理。MoodFX 是一款免费的在线症状追踪工具,可帮助患者在抑郁症治疗过程中进行疗效评估。我们进行了一项试验性随机评估,以检查其可用性和临床实用性。方法将重度抑郁发作(重度抑郁或双相情感障碍)患者随机分配到 MoodFX 或健康信息网站,分别作为干预和对照条件,并在基线、8 周和 6 个月时进行在线随访评估调查。主要的可用性结果包括在随访期间自述使用 MoodFX 3 次或更多次的患者比例(表明最低限度的充分使用),以及基于系统可用性量表(SUS)的可用性测量。次要临床结果包括抑郁症状快速自评量表(QIDS-SR)和患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)。在随机接受 MoodFX 治疗并完成用户调查的 23 名参与者中,有 18 人(78%)在 6 个月的研究期间使用 MoodFX 3 次或 3 次以上。平均 SUS 得分为 72.7(第 65-69 百分位数),可用性良好。与对照组相比,MoodFX 组在 QIDS-SR 和 PHQ-9 评分方面的改善效果明显更好,6 个月时的效应大小更大,响应率更高。结论:MoodFX 具有良好的可用性,并能减轻抑郁症状。这项试点研究支持在抑郁症治疗中使用数字工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信