Transition between peritoneal dialysis modalities: Impact on blood pressure levels and drug prescription in a national multicentric cohort

Marcus Dariva, Murilo Guedes, Vladimir Rigodon, Peter Kotanko, John W Larkin, Bruno Ferlin, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Pasqual Barretti, Thyago Proença de Moraes
{"title":"Transition between peritoneal dialysis modalities: Impact on blood pressure levels and drug prescription in a national multicentric cohort","authors":"Marcus Dariva, Murilo Guedes, Vladimir Rigodon, Peter Kotanko, John W Larkin, Bruno Ferlin, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Pasqual Barretti, Thyago Proença de Moraes","doi":"10.1177/08968608241240566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Hypertension is a leading cause of kidney failure, affects most dialysis patients and associates with adverse outcomes. Hypertension can be difficult to control with dialysis modalities having differential effects on sodium and water removal. There are two main types of peritoneal dialysis (PD), automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). It is unknown whether one is superior to the other in controlling blood pressure (BP). Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyse the impact of switching between these two PD modalities on BP levels in a nationally representative cohort.Methods:This was a cohort study of patients on PD from 122 dialysis centres in Brazil (BRAZPD II study). Clinical and laboratory data were collected monthly throughout the study duration. We selected all patients who remained on PD at least 6 months and 3 months on each modality at minimum. We compared the changes in mean systolic/diastolic blood pressures (SBP/DBP) before and after modality transition using a multilevel mixed-model where patients were at first level and their clinics at the second level.Results:We analysed data of 848 patients (814 starting on CAPD and 34 starting on APD). The SBP decreased by 4 (SD 22) mmHg when transitioning from CAPD to APD ( p < 0.001) and increased by 4 (SD 21) mmHg when transitioning from APD to CAPD ( p = 0.38); consistent findings were seen for DBP. There was no significant change in the number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed before and after transition.Conclusions:Transition between PD modalities seems to directly impact on BP levels. Further studies are needed to confirm if switching to APD could be an effective treatment for uncontrolled hypertension among CAPD patients.","PeriodicalId":519220,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241240566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Hypertension is a leading cause of kidney failure, affects most dialysis patients and associates with adverse outcomes. Hypertension can be difficult to control with dialysis modalities having differential effects on sodium and water removal. There are two main types of peritoneal dialysis (PD), automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). It is unknown whether one is superior to the other in controlling blood pressure (BP). Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyse the impact of switching between these two PD modalities on BP levels in a nationally representative cohort.Methods:This was a cohort study of patients on PD from 122 dialysis centres in Brazil (BRAZPD II study). Clinical and laboratory data were collected monthly throughout the study duration. We selected all patients who remained on PD at least 6 months and 3 months on each modality at minimum. We compared the changes in mean systolic/diastolic blood pressures (SBP/DBP) before and after modality transition using a multilevel mixed-model where patients were at first level and their clinics at the second level.Results:We analysed data of 848 patients (814 starting on CAPD and 34 starting on APD). The SBP decreased by 4 (SD 22) mmHg when transitioning from CAPD to APD ( p < 0.001) and increased by 4 (SD 21) mmHg when transitioning from APD to CAPD ( p = 0.38); consistent findings were seen for DBP. There was no significant change in the number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed before and after transition.Conclusions:Transition between PD modalities seems to directly impact on BP levels. Further studies are needed to confirm if switching to APD could be an effective treatment for uncontrolled hypertension among CAPD patients.
腹膜透析方式之间的转换:全国多中心队列对血压水平和药物处方的影响
背景:高血压是导致肾衰竭的主要原因之一,大多数透析患者都会患上高血压,并会导致不良后果。由于透析方式对钠和水的清除效果不同,高血压很难控制。腹膜透析(PD)主要有两种类型,即自动腹膜透析(APD)和连续不卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)。在控制血压(BP)方面,二者是否各有优劣尚不清楚。因此,我们的研究旨在分析在这两种腹膜透析方式之间切换对具有全国代表性队列中血压水平的影响。方法:这是一项队列研究,对象是巴西 122 个透析中心的腹膜透析患者(BRAZPD II 研究)。在整个研究期间,我们每月收集临床和实验室数据。我们选择了所有接受透析治疗至少 6 个月的患者,每种治疗方式至少持续 3 个月。结果:我们分析了 848 名患者(814 名开始使用 CAPD,34 名开始使用 APD)的数据。从 CAPD 过渡到 APD 时,SBP 下降了 4 (SD 22) mmHg ( p < 0.001),从 APD 过渡到 CAPD 时,SBP 上升了 4 (SD 21) mmHg ( p = 0.38);DBP 也出现了相同的结果。结论:PD 模式之间的转换似乎直接影响血压水平。需要进一步的研究来证实转用 APD 是否能有效治疗 CAPD 患者中未得到控制的高血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信