Ectogestation and Humanity’s Whence? An Exploration with Saint Augustine and Karl Barth

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Matthew Lee Anderson
{"title":"Ectogestation and Humanity’s Whence? An Exploration with Saint Augustine and Karl Barth","authors":"Matthew Lee Anderson","doi":"10.1093/cb/cbae006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the theological and anthropological significance of birth, in order to discern what might be lost with the adoption of complete ectogestation (“artificial wombs”). Specifically, it considers both Saint Augustine and Karl Barth’s respective accounts of humanity’s whence—that is, their theological answer to the question of the nature and significance of our origins as individuals. I suggest that Augustine’s account of his origins emphasizes both his epistemic and biological dependency on his mother and nurses, while Barth’s stresses the individual’s immediate derivation from God. Those disparate answers affect how they construe the relationships of parents and children and work themselves throughout their theological visions and imaginations. I conclude that careful consideration of humanity’s whence cannot answer whether we ought to pursue ectogestation; but it does help us account for how our understanding of God and ourselves might be altered if we gestate human life outside the womb.","PeriodicalId":42894,"journal":{"name":"Christian Bioethics","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbae006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay explores the theological and anthropological significance of birth, in order to discern what might be lost with the adoption of complete ectogestation (“artificial wombs”). Specifically, it considers both Saint Augustine and Karl Barth’s respective accounts of humanity’s whence—that is, their theological answer to the question of the nature and significance of our origins as individuals. I suggest that Augustine’s account of his origins emphasizes both his epistemic and biological dependency on his mother and nurses, while Barth’s stresses the individual’s immediate derivation from God. Those disparate answers affect how they construe the relationships of parents and children and work themselves throughout their theological visions and imaginations. I conclude that careful consideration of humanity’s whence cannot answer whether we ought to pursue ectogestation; but it does help us account for how our understanding of God and ourselves might be altered if we gestate human life outside the womb.
外孕与人类的起源?与圣奥古斯丁和卡尔-巴特的探讨
这篇文章探讨了出生在神学和人类学上的意义,以揭示采用完全外孕("人造子宫")可能会失去的东西。具体而言,本文探讨了圣奥古斯丁和卡尔-巴特各自对人类起源的论述,即他们对我们作为个体起源的性质和意义这一问题的神学回答。我认为,奥古斯丁关于人类起源的论述强调了人类在认识论和生物学上对母亲和护士的依赖,而巴特则强调了个人直接源自上帝。这些不同的答案影响了他们对父母与子女关系的理解,并贯穿于他们的神学构想和想象之中。我的结论是,仔细考虑人类的来源并不能回答我们是否应该追求胎儿外孕;但它确实有助于我们解释,如果我们在子宫外孕育人类生命,我们对上帝和我们自己的理解可能会发生怎样的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信