Barriers and facilitators of the reporting by family doctors of cases of domestic violence – a qualitative study across Portugal

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diana Nadine Moreira, Mariana Pinto da Costa
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators of the reporting by family doctors of cases of domestic violence – a qualitative study across Portugal","authors":"Diana Nadine Moreira, Mariana Pinto da Costa","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02329-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domestic violence (DV) is a serious and prevalent public health problem with devastating consequences for the victims and their families. Whilst the number of cases reported to the authorities has risen in recent years, many victims still chose not to present a complaint. In Portugal, to address this, DV became a public crime. As victims of DV present multiple health problems and frequently seek professional help, family doctors are in a privileged position to detect and report cases of DV to the authorities. However, little is known about what motivates these professionals to report or not the DV cases they encounter in their practice to the authorities. We conducted semi-structured interviews with family doctors from all regional health administrations of continental Portugal. Interviews occurred between July 2020 and September 2022, were conducted in person or remotely, audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Content analysis was conducted to assess the agreement or disagreement regarding mandatory reporting in each of the themes and subthemes. Fifty-four family doctors took part in this study (n = 39 women, n = 15 men). The main themes that arose from the analysis were: “Barriers related to the physician’s activity,” “Barriers related to the victim or aggressor,” “Facilitators related to the physician’s activity,” “Facilitators related to the victim or aggressor.” Although different barriers were described, most doctors agreed with the mandatory reporting of DV cases. Family doctors encounter multiple barriers and facilitators when considering reporting a DV case to the authorities. The results of this study can help develop new interventions to address the barriers described by the doctors, increasing their compliance with mandatory reporting, the protection of victims and the just persecution of the aggressor.","PeriodicalId":9019,"journal":{"name":"BMC Family Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02329-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Domestic violence (DV) is a serious and prevalent public health problem with devastating consequences for the victims and their families. Whilst the number of cases reported to the authorities has risen in recent years, many victims still chose not to present a complaint. In Portugal, to address this, DV became a public crime. As victims of DV present multiple health problems and frequently seek professional help, family doctors are in a privileged position to detect and report cases of DV to the authorities. However, little is known about what motivates these professionals to report or not the DV cases they encounter in their practice to the authorities. We conducted semi-structured interviews with family doctors from all regional health administrations of continental Portugal. Interviews occurred between July 2020 and September 2022, were conducted in person or remotely, audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Content analysis was conducted to assess the agreement or disagreement regarding mandatory reporting in each of the themes and subthemes. Fifty-four family doctors took part in this study (n = 39 women, n = 15 men). The main themes that arose from the analysis were: “Barriers related to the physician’s activity,” “Barriers related to the victim or aggressor,” “Facilitators related to the physician’s activity,” “Facilitators related to the victim or aggressor.” Although different barriers were described, most doctors agreed with the mandatory reporting of DV cases. Family doctors encounter multiple barriers and facilitators when considering reporting a DV case to the authorities. The results of this study can help develop new interventions to address the barriers described by the doctors, increasing their compliance with mandatory reporting, the protection of victims and the just persecution of the aggressor.
家庭医生报告家庭暴力案件的障碍和促进因素--葡萄牙全国定性研究
家庭暴力(DV)是一个严重而普遍的公共健康问题,给受害者及其家庭带来了毁灭性的后果。虽然近年来向当局举报的案件数量有所增加,但许多受害者仍然选择不投诉。为解决这一问题,葡萄牙将家庭暴力定为公共犯罪。由于家庭暴力的受害者会出现多种健康问题,并经常寻求专业帮助,因此家庭医生在发现并向当局报告家庭暴力案件方面具有得天独厚的优势。然而,人们对这些专业人员在执业过程中遇到的家庭暴力案件是否向当局报告的动机知之甚少。我们对葡萄牙大陆所有地区卫生行政部门的家庭医生进行了半结构化访谈。访谈时间为 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 9 月,访谈方式为当面访谈或远程访谈,并进行了录音、转录和专题分析。对每个主题和次主题进行了内容分析,以评估对强制报告的同意或不同意。54 名家庭医生参与了这项研究(女性 39 人,男性 15 人)。分析得出的主要主题有"与医生活动有关的障碍"、"与受害者或施暴者有关的障碍"、"与医生活动有关的促进因素"、"与受害者或施暴者有关的促进因素"。尽管医生们描述了不同的障碍,但大多数医生都同意强制报告家庭暴力案件。家庭医生在考虑向有关部门报告家庭暴力案件时会遇到多种障碍和促进因素。这项研究的结果有助于制定新的干预措施,以解决医生们所描述的障碍,提高他们对强制报告、保护受害者和公正起诉施暴者的遵从度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Family Practice
BMC Family Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Family Practice is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of primary health care research. The journal has a special focus on clinical decision making and management, continuing professional education, service utilization, needs and demand, and the organization and delivery of primary care and care in the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信