Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation, Intubation, and HFNT

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Miquel Ferrer, Gennaro De Pascale, Eloisa S. Tanzarella, Massimo Antonelli
{"title":"Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation, Intubation, and HFNT","authors":"Miquel Ferrer, Gennaro De Pascale, Eloisa S. Tanzarella, Massimo Antonelli","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1778140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Severe acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a major issue in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Standard oxygen therapy is the first-line therapy for ARF in the less severe cases. However, respiratory supports may be delivered in more severe clinical condition. In cases with life-threatening ARF, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) will be required. Noninvasive strategies such as high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) by either face mask or helmet might cover the gap between standard oxygen and IMV. The objective of all the supporting measures for ARF is to gain time for the antimicrobial treatment to cure the pneumonia. There is uncertainty regarding which patients with severe CAP are most likely to benefit from each noninvasive support strategy. HFNT may be the first-line approach in the majority of patients. While NIV may be relatively contraindicated in patients with excessive secretions, facial hair/structure resulting in air leaks or poor compliance, NIV may be preferable in those with increased work of breathing, respiratory muscle fatigue, and congestive heart failure, in which the positive pressure of NIV may positively impact hemodynamics. A trial of NIV might be considered for select patients with hypoxemic ARF if there are no contraindications, with close monitoring by an experienced clinical team who can intubate patients promptly if they deteriorate. In such cases, individual clinician judgement is key to choose NIV, interface, and settings. Due to the paucity of studies addressing IMV in this population, the protective mechanical ventilation strategies recommended by guidelines for acute respiratory distress syndrome can be reasonably applied in patients with severe CAP.</p> ","PeriodicalId":21727,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1778140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a major issue in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Standard oxygen therapy is the first-line therapy for ARF in the less severe cases. However, respiratory supports may be delivered in more severe clinical condition. In cases with life-threatening ARF, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) will be required. Noninvasive strategies such as high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) by either face mask or helmet might cover the gap between standard oxygen and IMV. The objective of all the supporting measures for ARF is to gain time for the antimicrobial treatment to cure the pneumonia. There is uncertainty regarding which patients with severe CAP are most likely to benefit from each noninvasive support strategy. HFNT may be the first-line approach in the majority of patients. While NIV may be relatively contraindicated in patients with excessive secretions, facial hair/structure resulting in air leaks or poor compliance, NIV may be preferable in those with increased work of breathing, respiratory muscle fatigue, and congestive heart failure, in which the positive pressure of NIV may positively impact hemodynamics. A trial of NIV might be considered for select patients with hypoxemic ARF if there are no contraindications, with close monitoring by an experienced clinical team who can intubate patients promptly if they deteriorate. In such cases, individual clinician judgement is key to choose NIV, interface, and settings. Due to the paucity of studies addressing IMV in this population, the protective mechanical ventilation strategies recommended by guidelines for acute respiratory distress syndrome can be reasonably applied in patients with severe CAP.

严重社区获得性肺炎:无创机械通气、插管和 HFNT
严重急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)是重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的一个主要问题。在病情较轻的情况下,标准氧疗是治疗 ARF 的一线疗法。然而,在临床病情较为严重的情况下,可以使用呼吸支持治疗。对于危及生命的 ARF 病例,则需要进行有创机械通气(IMV)。高流量鼻腔疗法(HFNT)或通过面罩或头盔进行无创通气(NIV)等无创策略可以弥补标准氧气和 IMV 之间的差距。所有针对 ARF 的辅助措施的目的都是为抗菌治疗赢得时间,以治愈肺炎。目前还不确定哪些重症 CAP 患者最有可能从每种无创支持策略中获益。HFNT 可能是大多数患者的一线治疗方法。对于分泌物过多、面部毛发/结构导致漏气或顺应性差的患者来说,NIV 可能是相对禁忌的,但对于呼吸功增加、呼吸肌疲劳和充血性心力衰竭的患者来说,NIV 可能更可取,因为 NIV 的正压可能会对血液动力学产生积极影响。如果没有禁忌症,可以考虑对部分低氧血症 ARF 患者进行 NIV 试验,并由经验丰富的临床团队进行密切监测,以便在患者病情恶化时及时为其插管。在这种情况下,临床医生个人的判断是选择 NIV、接口和设置的关键。由于针对此类患者的 IMV 研究较少,因此急性呼吸窘迫综合征指南推荐的保护性机械通气策略也可合理地应用于重症 CAP 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, laboratory studies, genetic breakthroughs, pathology, clinical features and management as related to such areas as asthma and other lung diseases, critical care management, cystic fibrosis, lung and heart transplantation, pulmonary pathogens, and pleural disease as well as many other related disorders.The journal focuses on new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, laboratory studies, genetic breakthroughs, pathology, clinical features and management as related to such areas as asthma and other lung diseases, critical care management, cystic fibrosis, lung and heart transplantation, pulmonary pathogens, and pleural disease as well as many other related disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信