The Bombardment History of the Giant Planet Satellites

IF 3.8 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
William F. Bottke, David Vokrouhlický, David Nesvorný, Raphael Marschall, Alessandro Morbidelli, Rogerio Deienno, Simone Marchi, Michelle Kirchoff, Luke Dones, Harold F. Levison
{"title":"The Bombardment History of the Giant Planet Satellites","authors":"William F. Bottke, David Vokrouhlický, David Nesvorný, Raphael Marschall, Alessandro Morbidelli, Rogerio Deienno, Simone Marchi, Michelle Kirchoff, Luke Dones, Harold F. Levison","doi":"10.3847/psj/ad29f4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The origins of the giant planet satellites are debated, with scenarios including formation from a protoplanetary disk, sequential assembly from massive rings, and recent accretion after major satellite–satellite collisions. Here, we test their predictions by simulating outer solar system bombardment and calculating the oldest surface ages on each moon. Our crater production model assumes the projectiles originated from a massive primordial Kuiper Belt (PKB) that experienced substantial changes from collisional evolution, which transformed its size frequency distribution into a wavy shape, and Neptune’s outward migration, which ejected most PKB objects onto destabilized orbits. The latter event also triggered an instability among the giant planets some tens of Myr after the solar nebula dispersed. We find all giant planet satellites are missing their earliest crater histories, with the likely source being impact resetting events. Iapetus, Hyperion, Phoebe, and Oberon have surface ages that are a few Myr to a few tens of Myr younger than when Neptune entered the PKB (i.e., they are 4.52–4.53 Gyr old). The remaining midsized satellites of Saturn and Uranus, as well as the small satellites located between Saturn’s rings and Dione, have surfaces that are younger still by many tens to many hundreds of Myr (4.1–4.5 Gyr old). A much wider range of surface ages are found for the large moons Callisto, Ganymede, Titan, and Europa (4.1, 3.4, 1.8, and 0.18 Gyr old, respectively). At present, we favor the midsized and larger moons forming within protoplanetary disks, with the other scenarios having several challenges to overcome.","PeriodicalId":34524,"journal":{"name":"The Planetary Science Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Planetary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad29f4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The origins of the giant planet satellites are debated, with scenarios including formation from a protoplanetary disk, sequential assembly from massive rings, and recent accretion after major satellite–satellite collisions. Here, we test their predictions by simulating outer solar system bombardment and calculating the oldest surface ages on each moon. Our crater production model assumes the projectiles originated from a massive primordial Kuiper Belt (PKB) that experienced substantial changes from collisional evolution, which transformed its size frequency distribution into a wavy shape, and Neptune’s outward migration, which ejected most PKB objects onto destabilized orbits. The latter event also triggered an instability among the giant planets some tens of Myr after the solar nebula dispersed. We find all giant planet satellites are missing their earliest crater histories, with the likely source being impact resetting events. Iapetus, Hyperion, Phoebe, and Oberon have surface ages that are a few Myr to a few tens of Myr younger than when Neptune entered the PKB (i.e., they are 4.52–4.53 Gyr old). The remaining midsized satellites of Saturn and Uranus, as well as the small satellites located between Saturn’s rings and Dione, have surfaces that are younger still by many tens to many hundreds of Myr (4.1–4.5 Gyr old). A much wider range of surface ages are found for the large moons Callisto, Ganymede, Titan, and Europa (4.1, 3.4, 1.8, and 0.18 Gyr old, respectively). At present, we favor the midsized and larger moons forming within protoplanetary disks, with the other scenarios having several challenges to overcome.
巨行星卫星的轰炸史
关于巨行星卫星的起源存在争议,包括从原行星系盘形成、从大质量环依次组装以及卫星与卫星发生重大碰撞后的近期吸积。在这里,我们通过模拟外太阳系轰击和计算每颗卫星上最古老的表面年龄来检验他们的预测。我们的陨石坑产生模型假定射弹来自一个巨大的原始柯伊伯带(PKB),而柯伊伯带经历了碰撞演化和海王星外迁所带来的巨大变化,碰撞演化将柯伊伯带的大小频率分布变成了波浪形,而海王星外迁则将大多数柯伊伯带天体弹射到了不稳定的轨道上。在太阳星云消散约几十亿年后,后一事件也引发了巨行星之间的不稳定。我们发现所有巨行星卫星都缺少最早的陨石坑历史,其来源可能是撞击重置事件。水卫一、海伯里昂、菲比和奥伯龙的表面年龄比海王星进入 PKB 时小几百万年到几十亿年(即 4.52-4.53 Gyr)。土星和天王星的其余中型卫星,以及位于土星环和天王星之间的小型卫星,其表面年龄比海王星进入 PKB 时还要年轻几十到几百 Myr(即 4.1-4.5 Gyr)。大卫星卡利斯托(Callisto)、木卫三(Ganymede)、土卫六(Titan)和木卫二(Europa)的表面年龄范围要大得多(分别为 4.1、3.4、1.8 和 0.18 Gyr)。目前,我们倾向于在原行星盘内形成的中型和大型卫星,而其他方案还有一些挑战需要克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Planetary Science Journal
The Planetary Science Journal Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信