Inventorizing marine biodiversity using eDNA data from Indonesian coral reefs: comparative high throughput analysis using different bioinformatic pipelines
Ni Kadek Dita Cahyani, Aji Wahyu Anggoro, Muhammad Danie Al Malik, Beginer Subhan, Lalu M. Iqbal Sani, Hawis Madduppa
{"title":"Inventorizing marine biodiversity using eDNA data from Indonesian coral reefs: comparative high throughput analysis using different bioinformatic pipelines","authors":"Ni Kadek Dita Cahyani, Aji Wahyu Anggoro, Muhammad Danie Al Malik, Beginer Subhan, Lalu M. Iqbal Sani, Hawis Madduppa","doi":"10.1007/s12526-024-01432-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The selection of specific bioinformatic pipelines to analyse Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) data is instrumental for generating accurate biological inferences; users should understand the limitations of the pipelines and incorporate existing biodiversity information to evaluate results. Pipelines that maximize the coverage and precision of taxonomic inventories and are in line with local biodiversity characteristics should be preferred. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding based on NGS technology is projected to be widely employed for biomonitoring applications and to supplement established ways of monitoring marine biodiversity. In Indonesia, research has concentrated on assessing taxonomic composition in various geographical and environmental situations and on identifying taxa that are susceptible to environmental changes. This study aims to compare four NGS data analysis pipelines (Anacapa, QIIME2 with DADA2, QIIME2 with Deblur and Galaxy) using a 28-sample subset of published eDNA seawater samples collected from seawater across Indonesia. The outputs of the bioinformatics analyses between the pipelines differed. Anacapa, QIIME2 with DADA2, and Galaxy pipelines provide more comprehensive taxonomic coverage relevant to existing biodiversity records from the regions compared to QIIME2 with Deblur. Anacapa in particular could successfully detect taxa that have not been detected with other pipelines tested. These findings should be taken into account when doing eDNA metabarcoding analyses, especially when assessing marine biodiversity in terms of species diversity and abundance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18201,"journal":{"name":"Marine Biodiversity","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-024-01432-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The selection of specific bioinformatic pipelines to analyse Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) data is instrumental for generating accurate biological inferences; users should understand the limitations of the pipelines and incorporate existing biodiversity information to evaluate results. Pipelines that maximize the coverage and precision of taxonomic inventories and are in line with local biodiversity characteristics should be preferred. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding based on NGS technology is projected to be widely employed for biomonitoring applications and to supplement established ways of monitoring marine biodiversity. In Indonesia, research has concentrated on assessing taxonomic composition in various geographical and environmental situations and on identifying taxa that are susceptible to environmental changes. This study aims to compare four NGS data analysis pipelines (Anacapa, QIIME2 with DADA2, QIIME2 with Deblur and Galaxy) using a 28-sample subset of published eDNA seawater samples collected from seawater across Indonesia. The outputs of the bioinformatics analyses between the pipelines differed. Anacapa, QIIME2 with DADA2, and Galaxy pipelines provide more comprehensive taxonomic coverage relevant to existing biodiversity records from the regions compared to QIIME2 with Deblur. Anacapa in particular could successfully detect taxa that have not been detected with other pipelines tested. These findings should be taken into account when doing eDNA metabarcoding analyses, especially when assessing marine biodiversity in terms of species diversity and abundance.
期刊介绍:
Marine Biodiversity is a peer-reviewed international journal devoted to all aspects of biodiversity research on marine ecosystems. The journal is a relaunch of the well-known Senckenbergiana maritima" and covers research at gene, species and ecosystem level that focuses on describing the actors (genes and species), the patterns (gradients and distributions) and understanding of the processes responsible for the regulation and maintenance of diversity in marine systems. Also included are the study of species interactions (symbioses, parasitism, etc.) and the role of species in structuring marine ecosystem functioning.
Marine Biodiversity offers articles in the category original paper, short note, Oceanarium and review article. It forms a platform for marine biodiversity researchers from all over the world for the exchange of new information and discussions on concepts and exciting discoveries.
- Covers research in all aspects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems
- Describes the actors, the patterns and the processes responsible for diversity
- Offers peer-reviewed original papers, short communications, review articles and news (Oceanarium)
- No page charges