Under my umbrella: LGBTQIA+ rights, LGBTQIA+ researchers and ‘internal allyship’

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Aidan Ricciardo, Liam Elphick
{"title":"Under my umbrella: LGBTQIA+ rights, LGBTQIA+ researchers and ‘internal allyship’","authors":"Aidan Ricciardo, Liam Elphick","doi":"10.1177/1037969x241245120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we consider the ethical obligations that LGBTQIA+ researchers have in researching LGBTQIA+ rights. First, we consider the potential impact of identity and positionality. Although people of all LGBTQIA+ identities share common experiences of marginalisation and persecution, there is much diversity among LGBTQIA+ people and their many intersections. We then propose that LGBTQIA+ researchers should act as ‘internal allies’ when undertaking work related to LGBTQIA+ communities. The familiar concept of allyship imposes obligations which are dynamic, appropriate for the research context and align with community expectations. These obligations include self-education, consultation and platforming marginalised voices.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241245120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we consider the ethical obligations that LGBTQIA+ researchers have in researching LGBTQIA+ rights. First, we consider the potential impact of identity and positionality. Although people of all LGBTQIA+ identities share common experiences of marginalisation and persecution, there is much diversity among LGBTQIA+ people and their many intersections. We then propose that LGBTQIA+ researchers should act as ‘internal allies’ when undertaking work related to LGBTQIA+ communities. The familiar concept of allyship imposes obligations which are dynamic, appropriate for the research context and align with community expectations. These obligations include self-education, consultation and platforming marginalised voices.
在我的保护伞下LGBTQIA+ 权利、LGBTQIA+ 研究人员和 "内部盟友关系
在本文中,我们将探讨 LGBTQIA+ 研究人员在研究 LGBTQIA+ 权利时应承担的道德义务。首先,我们考虑身份和地位的潜在影响。尽管所有 LGBTQIA+ 身份的人都有被边缘化和受迫害的共同经历,但 LGBTQIA+ 人群及其众多交叉点之间存在着很大的多样性。因此,我们建议 LGBTQIA+ 研究人员在开展与 LGBTQIA+ 社区相关的工作时,应扮演 "内部盟友 "的角色。我们所熟悉的盟友概念要求研究人员承担动态的、适合研究环境的、符合社区期望的义务。这些义务包括自我教育、咨询和为边缘化的声音提供平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信