Frequency Domain Analysis of Hamstring Activation During Jump-Landing Performance by Athletes with Diverse Training Regimens

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Amornthep Jankaew, Yih-Kuen Jan, Cheng-Feng Lin
{"title":"Frequency Domain Analysis of Hamstring Activation During Jump-Landing Performance by Athletes with Diverse Training Regimens","authors":"Amornthep Jankaew, Yih-Kuen Jan, Cheng-Feng Lin","doi":"10.1007/s40846-024-00857-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study investigated hamstring activation in the frequency domain and jump-landing performance in a specialized-training athletic population and a healthy control group.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Thirty male athletes engaged in power training, both with and without jumping sports, or endurance training, together with ten healthy participants were recruited. Surface EMG electrodes were attached to the bellies of the lateral hamstring (LH) and medial hamstring (MH). The median EMG frequency was analyzed during takeoff, flight, before ground contact, after ground contact, and landing in countermovement jumps (CMJ) and drop-vertical jumps (DJ). Kinetic outcomes were also investigated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The power-trained athletes (with and without jumping sports) exhibited a lower median EMG frequency in the MH during takeoff (<i>p</i> = 0.001 for DJ) and in the LH (<i>p</i> = 0.008 for DJ) and MH during landing (<i>p</i> = 0.004 for CMJ and 0.001 for DJ) compared with the endurance-trained or control groups. Furthermore, the power-trained group demonstrated greater jump heights (<i>p</i> = 0.009 for CMJ and <i>p</i> = 0.003 for DJ). All the athletic groups showed a lower landing force (<i>p</i> = 0.022) and loading rate (<i>p</i> = 0.043) in CMJ than the control group.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Training background differences influenced hamstring recruitment during jumping. Power-trained athletes exhibited a lower median EMG frequency and better jumping performance. All the athletes demonstrated a more effective landing strategy than the control group. These findings suggest the potential for enhancing athletic performance and aiding in landing strategy by exploiting different training styles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00857-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated hamstring activation in the frequency domain and jump-landing performance in a specialized-training athletic population and a healthy control group.

Methods

Thirty male athletes engaged in power training, both with and without jumping sports, or endurance training, together with ten healthy participants were recruited. Surface EMG electrodes were attached to the bellies of the lateral hamstring (LH) and medial hamstring (MH). The median EMG frequency was analyzed during takeoff, flight, before ground contact, after ground contact, and landing in countermovement jumps (CMJ) and drop-vertical jumps (DJ). Kinetic outcomes were also investigated.

Results

The power-trained athletes (with and without jumping sports) exhibited a lower median EMG frequency in the MH during takeoff (p = 0.001 for DJ) and in the LH (p = 0.008 for DJ) and MH during landing (p = 0.004 for CMJ and 0.001 for DJ) compared with the endurance-trained or control groups. Furthermore, the power-trained group demonstrated greater jump heights (p = 0.009 for CMJ and p = 0.003 for DJ). All the athletic groups showed a lower landing force (p = 0.022) and loading rate (p = 0.043) in CMJ than the control group.

Conclusion

Training background differences influenced hamstring recruitment during jumping. Power-trained athletes exhibited a lower median EMG frequency and better jumping performance. All the athletes demonstrated a more effective landing strategy than the control group. These findings suggest the potential for enhancing athletic performance and aiding in landing strategy by exploiting different training styles.

Abstract Image

对采用不同训练方法的运动员在起跳过程中腘绳肌激活情况的频域分析
目的 本研究调查了进行专门训练的运动员群体和健康对照组的腘绳肌频域激活和起跳落地表现。方法 招募了 30 名进行力量训练(包括和不包括跳跃运动)或耐力训练的男性运动员和 10 名健康参与者。在腘绳肌外侧(LH)和腘绳肌内侧(MH)的腹部连接了表面肌电图电极。分析了起飞、飞行、接触地面前、接触地面后以及反向运动跳(CMJ)和落地垂直跳(DJ)着陆时的肌电图中位频率。结果与耐力训练组或对照组相比,力量训练组运动员(进行过和未进行过跳跃运动)起飞时 MH 的肌电图频率中值较低(DJ 为 p = 0.001),着陆时 LH(DJ 为 p = 0.008)和 MH 的肌电图频率中值较低(CMJ 为 p = 0.004,DJ 为 p = 0.001)。此外,力量训练组的跳跃高度更大(CMJ p = 0.009,DJ p = 0.003)。所有运动组在 CMJ 中的着地力(p = 0.022)和负荷率(p = 0.043)均低于对照组。力量训练运动员的肌电图频率中位数更低,跳跃表现更好。与对照组相比,所有运动员都表现出更有效的着地策略。这些研究结果表明,利用不同的训练方式,有可能提高运动员的运动成绩,并有助于着地策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, JMBE, is committed to encouraging and providing the standard of biomedical engineering. The journal is devoted to publishing papers related to clinical engineering, biomedical signals, medical imaging, bio-informatics, tissue engineering, and so on. Other than the above articles, any contributions regarding hot issues and technological developments that help reach the purpose are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信