Agile meets quantum: a novel genetic algorithm model for predicting the success of quantum software development project

IF 2 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Arif Ali Khan, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Valtteri Lahtinen, Marko Paavola, Mahmood Niazi, Mohammed Naif Alatawi, Shoayee Dlaim Alotaibi
{"title":"Agile meets quantum: a novel genetic algorithm model for predicting the success of quantum software development project","authors":"Arif Ali Khan,&nbsp;Muhammad Azeem Akbar,&nbsp;Valtteri Lahtinen,&nbsp;Marko Paavola,&nbsp;Mahmood Niazi,&nbsp;Mohammed Naif Alatawi,&nbsp;Shoayee Dlaim Alotaibi","doi":"10.1007/s10515-024-00434-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantum software systems represent a new realm in software engineering, utilizing quantum bits (Qubits) and quantum gates (Qgates) to solve the complex problems more efficiently than classical counterparts. Agile software development approaches are considered to address many inherent challenges in quantum software development, but their effective integration remains unexplored. This study investigates key causes of challenges that could hinders the adoption of traditional agile approaches in quantum software projects and develop an Agile-Quantum Software Project Success Prediction Model (AQSSPM). Firstly, we identified 19 causes of challenging factors discussed in our previous study, which are potentially impacting agile-quantum project success. Secondly, a survey was conducted to collect expert opinions on these causes and applied Genetic Algorithm (GA) with Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Logistic Regression (LR) to develop the AQSSPM. Utilizing GA with NBC, project success probability improved from 53.17 to 99.68%, with cost reductions from 0.463 to 0.403%. Similarly, GA with LR increased success rates from 55.52 to 98.99%, and costs decreased from 0.496 to 0.409% after 100 iterations. Both methods result showed a strong positive correlation (rs = 0.955) in causes ranking, with no significant difference between them (<i>t</i> = 1.195, <i>p</i> = 0.240 &gt; 0.05). The AQSSPM highlights critical focus areas for efficiently and successfully implementing agile-quantum projects considering the cost factor of a particular project.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55414,"journal":{"name":"Automated Software Engineering","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10515-024-00434-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-024-00434-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantum software systems represent a new realm in software engineering, utilizing quantum bits (Qubits) and quantum gates (Qgates) to solve the complex problems more efficiently than classical counterparts. Agile software development approaches are considered to address many inherent challenges in quantum software development, but their effective integration remains unexplored. This study investigates key causes of challenges that could hinders the adoption of traditional agile approaches in quantum software projects and develop an Agile-Quantum Software Project Success Prediction Model (AQSSPM). Firstly, we identified 19 causes of challenging factors discussed in our previous study, which are potentially impacting agile-quantum project success. Secondly, a survey was conducted to collect expert opinions on these causes and applied Genetic Algorithm (GA) with Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Logistic Regression (LR) to develop the AQSSPM. Utilizing GA with NBC, project success probability improved from 53.17 to 99.68%, with cost reductions from 0.463 to 0.403%. Similarly, GA with LR increased success rates from 55.52 to 98.99%, and costs decreased from 0.496 to 0.409% after 100 iterations. Both methods result showed a strong positive correlation (rs = 0.955) in causes ranking, with no significant difference between them (t = 1.195, p = 0.240 > 0.05). The AQSSPM highlights critical focus areas for efficiently and successfully implementing agile-quantum projects considering the cost factor of a particular project.

Abstract Image

敏捷与量子的结合:预测量子软件开发项目成功与否的新型遗传算法模型
量子软件系统代表了软件工程的一个新领域,它利用量子比特(Qubits)和量子门(Qgates)解决复杂问题的效率高于经典软件系统。敏捷软件开发方法被认为可以解决量子软件开发中的许多固有挑战,但其有效整合仍有待探索。本研究调查了可能阻碍量子软件项目采用传统敏捷方法的主要挑战原因,并开发了敏捷-量子软件项目成功预测模型(AQSSPM)。首先,我们确定了之前研究中讨论的 19 个挑战性因素的原因,这些因素可能会影响敏捷-量子项目的成功。其次,我们进行了一项调查,收集了专家对这些原因的意见,并应用遗传算法(GA)、Naive Bayes 分类器(NBC)和逻辑回归(LR)开发了 AQSSPM。利用带有 NBC 的遗传算法,项目成功概率从 53.17% 提高到 99.68%,成本从 0.463% 降低到 0.403%。同样,利用 LR 的 GA 经过 100 次迭代后,成功率从 55.52% 提高到 98.99%,成本从 0.496% 降低到 0.409%。两种方法的结果在原因排序方面都显示出很强的正相关性(rs = 0.955),两者之间没有显著差异(t = 1.195,p = 0.240 >0.05)。考虑到特定项目的成本因素,AQSSPM 突出了高效、成功实施敏捷量子项目的关键重点领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Automated Software Engineering
Automated Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal details research, tutorial papers, survey and accounts of significant industrial experience in the foundations, techniques, tools and applications of automated software engineering technology. This includes the study of techniques for constructing, understanding, adapting, and modeling software artifacts and processes. Coverage in Automated Software Engineering examines both automatic systems and collaborative systems as well as computational models of human software engineering activities. In addition, it presents knowledge representations and artificial intelligence techniques applicable to automated software engineering, and formal techniques that support or provide theoretical foundations. The journal also includes reviews of books, software, conferences and workshops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信