Implications of additive × additive epistasis for common bean breeding

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Rita Carolina de Melo, Jefferson Luís Meirelles Coimbra, João Gilberto Corrêa da Silva, Paulo Henrique Cerutti, Luan Tiago dos Santos Carbonari, Altamir Frederico Guidolin
{"title":"Implications of additive × additive epistasis for common bean breeding","authors":"Rita Carolina de Melo, Jefferson Luís Meirelles Coimbra, João Gilberto Corrêa da Silva, Paulo Henrique Cerutti, Luan Tiago dos Santos Carbonari, Altamir Frederico Guidolin","doi":"10.1007/s10681-024-03330-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The presence of epistasis in complex traits can be significant and affect the selection of segregating populations undesirably. The purpose of this study was to determine the epistatic genetic components that influence root and shoot traits of common bean and identify their effect on the performance of segregating populations. The field experiment consisted of 49 treatments (backcross progenies, parents and segregating populations in the F<sub>2</sub> and F<sub>3</sub> generations). The cross P<sub>1</sub>-BAF53 (Andean) × P<sub>2</sub>-IPR 88 Uirapuru (Mesoamerican) as reference. Six traits were taken into consideration: root distribution (%), first pod length (cm), number of grains (plot), plant height (cm), reproductive cycle (days) and number of basal branches (plot). For root distribution, first pod length and number of grains, the additive and additive × additive components were significant. On the contrary, for plant height, reproductive cycle and number of basal branches, no interaction component was observed. These results can be explained by the magnitude of variance determined for these traits. The additive × additive epistasis had a negative influence on the mean performance of segregating progenies. Contrariwise, transgressive segregation effects on plant height were observed as a function of genetic dominance deviation. Thus, additive × additive epistasis can hamper the success of a breeding program, for being associated with low-variability traits. This fact may be related with the number of crosses and/or the choice of genetically more distant parents for the program, and possibly with the presence of linked genes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11803,"journal":{"name":"Euphytica","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euphytica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03330-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of epistasis in complex traits can be significant and affect the selection of segregating populations undesirably. The purpose of this study was to determine the epistatic genetic components that influence root and shoot traits of common bean and identify their effect on the performance of segregating populations. The field experiment consisted of 49 treatments (backcross progenies, parents and segregating populations in the F2 and F3 generations). The cross P1-BAF53 (Andean) × P2-IPR 88 Uirapuru (Mesoamerican) as reference. Six traits were taken into consideration: root distribution (%), first pod length (cm), number of grains (plot), plant height (cm), reproductive cycle (days) and number of basal branches (plot). For root distribution, first pod length and number of grains, the additive and additive × additive components were significant. On the contrary, for plant height, reproductive cycle and number of basal branches, no interaction component was observed. These results can be explained by the magnitude of variance determined for these traits. The additive × additive epistasis had a negative influence on the mean performance of segregating progenies. Contrariwise, transgressive segregation effects on plant height were observed as a function of genetic dominance deviation. Thus, additive × additive epistasis can hamper the success of a breeding program, for being associated with low-variability traits. This fact may be related with the number of crosses and/or the choice of genetically more distant parents for the program, and possibly with the presence of linked genes.

加性×加性外显性对普通豆育种的影响
复杂性状中存在的表观遗传可能非常重要,会对分离群体的选择产生不良影响。本研究的目的是确定影响蚕豆根和芽性状的表观遗传成分,并识别它们对分离群体表现的影响。田间试验包括 49 个处理(回交后代、亲本以及 F2 和 F3 代的分离群体)。以 P1-BAF53(安第斯)×P2-IPR 88 Uirapuru(中美洲)杂交种为参照。研究考虑了六个性状:根系分布(%)、第一荚长度(厘米)、谷粒数(小区)、株高(厘米)、生殖周期(天数)和基部分枝数(小区)。在根系分布、第一荚长度和谷粒数方面,加性和加性×加性成分显著。相反,在株高、生殖周期和基部分枝数方面,没有观察到交互作用成分。这些结果可以用这些性状的方差大小来解释。加性 × 加性外显对分离后代的平均表现有负面影响。相反,植株高度的转基因分离效应是遗传优势偏差的函数。因此,加性×加性外显率会阻碍育种计划的成功,因为它与低变异性状相关。这可能与杂交的数量和/或选择遗传距离较远的亲本有关,也可能与连锁基因的存在有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Euphytica
Euphytica 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Euphytica is an international journal on theoretical and applied aspects of plant breeding. It publishes critical reviews and papers on the results of original research related to plant breeding. The integration of modern and traditional plant breeding is a growing field of research using transgenic crop plants and/or marker assisted breeding in combination with traditional breeding tools. The content should cover the interests of researchers directly or indirectly involved in plant breeding, at universities, breeding institutes, seed industries, plant biotech companies and industries using plant raw materials, and promote stability, adaptability and sustainability in agriculture and agro-industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信