Inter- and intra-observer variability of qualitative visual breast-composition assessment in mammography among Japanese physicians: a first multi-institutional observer performance study in Japan

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yoichi Koyama, Kazuaki Nakashima, Shunichiro Orihara, Hiroko Tsunoda, Fuyo Kimura, Natsuki Uenaka, Kanako Ban, Yukiko Michishita, Yoshihide Kanemaki, Arisa Kurihara, Kanae Tawaraya, Masataka Taguri, Takashi Ishikawa, Takayoshi Uematsu
{"title":"Inter- and intra-observer variability of qualitative visual breast-composition assessment in mammography among Japanese physicians: a first multi-institutional observer performance study in Japan","authors":"Yoichi Koyama, Kazuaki Nakashima, Shunichiro Orihara, Hiroko Tsunoda, Fuyo Kimura, Natsuki Uenaka, Kanako Ban, Yukiko Michishita, Yoshihide Kanemaki, Arisa Kurihara, Kanae Tawaraya, Masataka Taguri, Takashi Ishikawa, Takayoshi Uematsu","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01580-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Visual assessment of mammographic breast composition remains the most common worldwide, although subjective variability limits its reproducibility. This study aimed to investigate the inter- and intra-observer variability in qualitative visual assessment of mammographic breast composition through a multi-institutional observer performance study for the first time in Japan.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study enrolled 10 Japanese physicians from five different institutions. They used the new Japanese breast-composition classification system 4th edition to subjectively evaluate the breast composition in 200 pairs of right and left normal mediolateral oblique mammograms (number determined using precise sample size calculations) twice, with a 1-month interval (median patient age: 59 years [range 40–69 years]). The primary endpoint of this study was the inter-observer variability using kappa (<i>κ</i>) value.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Inter-observer variability for the four and two classes of breast-composition assessment revealed moderate agreement (Fleiss’ <i>κ</i>: first and second reading = 0.553 and 0.587, respectively) and substantial agreement (Fleiss’ κ: first and second reading = 0.689 and 0.70, respectively). Intra-observer variability for the four and two classes of breast-composition assessment demonstrated substantial agreement (Cohen’s <i>κ</i>, median = 0.758) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen’s <i>κ</i>, median = 0.813). Assessments of consensus between the 10 physicians and the automated software Volpara® revealed slight agreement (Cohen’s <i>κ</i>; first and second reading: 0.104 and 0.075, respectively).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Qualitative visual assessment of mammographic breast composition using the new Japanese classification revealed excellent intra-observer reproducibility. However, persistent inter-observer variability, presenting a challenge in establishing it as the gold standard in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01580-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Visual assessment of mammographic breast composition remains the most common worldwide, although subjective variability limits its reproducibility. This study aimed to investigate the inter- and intra-observer variability in qualitative visual assessment of mammographic breast composition through a multi-institutional observer performance study for the first time in Japan.

Methods

This study enrolled 10 Japanese physicians from five different institutions. They used the new Japanese breast-composition classification system 4th edition to subjectively evaluate the breast composition in 200 pairs of right and left normal mediolateral oblique mammograms (number determined using precise sample size calculations) twice, with a 1-month interval (median patient age: 59 years [range 40–69 years]). The primary endpoint of this study was the inter-observer variability using kappa (κ) value.

Results

Inter-observer variability for the four and two classes of breast-composition assessment revealed moderate agreement (Fleiss’ κ: first and second reading = 0.553 and 0.587, respectively) and substantial agreement (Fleiss’ κ: first and second reading = 0.689 and 0.70, respectively). Intra-observer variability for the four and two classes of breast-composition assessment demonstrated substantial agreement (Cohen’s κ, median = 0.758) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen’s κ, median = 0.813). Assessments of consensus between the 10 physicians and the automated software Volpara® revealed slight agreement (Cohen’s κ; first and second reading: 0.104 and 0.075, respectively).

Conclusions

Qualitative visual assessment of mammographic breast composition using the new Japanese classification revealed excellent intra-observer reproducibility. However, persistent inter-observer variability, presenting a challenge in establishing it as the gold standard in Japan.

Abstract Image

日本医生在乳房 X 射线照相术中对乳房构成进行定性视觉评估的观察者之间和观察者内部的差异:日本首次多机构观察者绩效研究
背景乳腺X线摄影乳房成分的视觉评估仍是全球最常见的方法,但主观变异性限制了其可重复性。本研究旨在通过在日本首次开展的多机构观察者表现研究,调查乳腺X线摄影乳房成分定性视觉评估中观察者之间和观察者内部的变异性。他们使用新的日本乳房成分分类系统第 4 版,对 200 对左右正常内外侧斜位乳房 X 光片(数量通过精确的样本量计算确定)进行了两次乳房成分主观评估,每次评估间隔 1 个月(患者年龄中位数:59 岁[40-69 岁])。结果四级和两级乳房结构评估的观察者间变异性显示出中等程度的一致性(Fleiss'κ:第一次和第二次读数分别为 0.553 和 0.587)和实质性的一致性(Fleiss'κ:第一次和第二次读数分别为 0.689 和 0.70)。四级和两级乳房结构评估的观察者内部变异性表现为高度一致(Cohen's κ,中位数 = 0.758)和几乎完全一致(Cohen's κ,中位数 = 0.813)。对 10 位医生与 Volpara® 自动软件之间的共识进行评估后发现,两者之间存在轻微的一致性(Cohen's κ;第一和第二读数分别为 0.104 和 0.075)。结论使用日本新分类法进行乳腺成分的定性目测评估显示,观察者内部的重现性极佳,但观察者之间的变异性持续存在,这为在日本将其确立为黄金标准带来了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信