Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Isolated Proctitis: Results From the Phase 3 ELEVATE UC Clinical Programme

Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Marla C Dubinsky, Bruce E Sands, Julian Panés, Stefan Schreiber, Walter Reinisch, Brian G Feagan, Silvio Danese, Andres J Yarur, Geert R D’Haens, Martina Goetsch, Karolina Wosik, Michael Keating, Krisztina Lazin, Joseph Wu, Irene Modesto, Aoibhinn McDonnell, Lauren Bartolome, Séverine Vermeire
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Isolated Proctitis: Results From the Phase 3 ELEVATE UC Clinical Programme","authors":"Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Marla C Dubinsky, Bruce E Sands, Julian Panés, Stefan Schreiber, Walter Reinisch, Brian G Feagan, Silvio Danese, Andres J Yarur, Geert R D’Haens, Martina Goetsch, Karolina Wosik, Michael Keating, Krisztina Lazin, Joseph Wu, Irene Modesto, Aoibhinn McDonnell, Lauren Bartolome, Séverine Vermeire","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Pivotal trials in ulcerative colitis have historically excluded patients with isolated proctitis. Etrasimod is an oral, oncedaily, selective sphingosine 1phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily in patients with isolated proctitis (centrally read) from the phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials. Methods Patients, including those with isolated proctitis (<10 cm rectal involvement) who met all other inclusion criteria in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, were randomised 2:1 to receive etrasimod or placebo. Primary, secondary and other identified efficacy endpoints and safety were assessed. Results We analysed data from 64 and 723 patients at Week 12 (both trials pooled), and 36 and 397 patients at Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52 only) with isolated proctitis and more extensive colitis (≥10 cm rectal involvement), respectively. Patients with isolated proctitis receiving etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo, including clinical remission rates at Weeks 12 (42.9% vs 13.6%) and 52 (44.4% vs 11.1%), endoscopic improvement (52.4% vs 22.7%) at Week 12 and bowel urgency numerical rating scale score at Week 12 (all p<0.01). Generally similar trends were observed in patients with more extensive colitis. Safety was consistent across subgroups, with no new findings. Conclusions Etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in patients with isolated proctitis, and those with more extensive disease, in most efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and 52.","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims Pivotal trials in ulcerative colitis have historically excluded patients with isolated proctitis. Etrasimod is an oral, oncedaily, selective sphingosine 1phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily in patients with isolated proctitis (centrally read) from the phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials. Methods Patients, including those with isolated proctitis (<10 cm rectal involvement) who met all other inclusion criteria in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, were randomised 2:1 to receive etrasimod or placebo. Primary, secondary and other identified efficacy endpoints and safety were assessed. Results We analysed data from 64 and 723 patients at Week 12 (both trials pooled), and 36 and 397 patients at Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52 only) with isolated proctitis and more extensive colitis (≥10 cm rectal involvement), respectively. Patients with isolated proctitis receiving etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo, including clinical remission rates at Weeks 12 (42.9% vs 13.6%) and 52 (44.4% vs 11.1%), endoscopic improvement (52.4% vs 22.7%) at Week 12 and bowel urgency numerical rating scale score at Week 12 (all p<0.01). Generally similar trends were observed in patients with more extensive colitis. Safety was consistent across subgroups, with no new findings. Conclusions Etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in patients with isolated proctitis, and those with more extensive disease, in most efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and 52.
Etrasimod对中度至重度活动性孤立性直肠炎患者的疗效和安全性:ELEVATE UC 临床项目 3 期研究结果
背景和目的 溃疡性结肠炎的关键性试验历来不包括孤立性直肠炎患者。依曲莫德是一种口服、每日一次的选择性鞘磷脂1,4,5受体调节剂,用于治疗中度至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎。这项事后分析评估了 ELEVATE UC 52 和 ELEVATE UC 12 三期试验中孤立性直肠炎(中心读数)患者每日一次服用 2 毫克依曲莫德的疗效和安全性。方法 对符合 ELEVATE UC 52 和 ELEVATE UC 12 所有其他纳入标准的孤立性直肠炎患者(直肠受累达 10 厘米)进行 2:1 随机分组,接受依曲莫德或安慰剂治疗。对主要、次要和其他已确定的疗效终点以及安全性进行了评估。结果 我们分析了分别患有孤立性直肠炎和范围更广的结肠炎(直肠受累≥10厘米)的64例和723例患者在第12周(两项试验汇总)的数据,以及36例和397例患者在第52周(仅ELEVATE UC 52)的数据。与安慰剂相比,接受依曲莫德治疗的孤立性直肠炎患者病情有显著改善,包括第12周(42.9% vs 13.6%)和第52周(44.4% vs 11.1%)的临床缓解率、第12周的内镜改善率(52.4% vs 22.7%)以及第12周的肠紧迫性数字评分量表得分(均为p<0.01)。在范围更广的结肠炎患者中也观察到了大致相似的趋势。各亚组的安全性一致,没有新的发现。结论 在第12周和第52周,与安慰剂相比,Etrasimod在大多数疗效终点方面对孤立性直肠炎患者和病变范围更广的患者均有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信