Fecal Microbiota Transplantation engraftment after budesonide or placebo in patients with active ulcerative colitis using pre-selected donors: a randomized pilot study

Emilie van Lingen, Sam Nooij, Elisabeth Terveer, Emily Crossette, Amanda Prince, Shakti Bhattarai, Andrea Watson, Gianluca Galazzo, Rajita Menon, Rose Szabady, Vanni Bucci, Jason Norman, Janneke van der Woude, Sander van der Marel, Hein Verspaget, Andrea van der Meulen – de Jong, Josbert Keller
{"title":"Fecal Microbiota Transplantation engraftment after budesonide or placebo in patients with active ulcerative colitis using pre-selected donors: a randomized pilot study","authors":"Emilie van Lingen, Sam Nooij, Elisabeth Terveer, Emily Crossette, Amanda Prince, Shakti Bhattarai, Andrea Watson, Gianluca Galazzo, Rajita Menon, Rose Szabady, Vanni Bucci, Jason Norman, Janneke van der Woude, Sander van der Marel, Hein Verspaget, Andrea van der Meulen – de Jong, Josbert Keller","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) shows some efficacy in treating patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), although variability has been observed among donors and treatment regimens. We investigated the effect of FMT using rationally selected donors after pretreatment with budesonide or placebo in active UC. Methods Patients ≥ 18 years old with mild to moderate active UC were randomly assigned to three weeks budesonide (9 mg) or placebo followed by four weekly infusions of a donor feces suspension. Two donors were selected based on microbiota composition, Treg induction and SCFA production in mice. The primary endpoint was engraftment of donor microbiota after FMT. In addition, clinical efficacy was assessed. Results In total, 24 patients were enrolled. Pretreatment with budesonide did not increase donor microbiota engraftment (p=0.56) nor clinical response, and engraftment was not associated with clinical response. At week 14, 10/24 (42%) of patients achieved (partial) remission. Remarkably, patients treated with FMT suspensions from one donor were associated with clinical response (80% of responders, p<0.05) but had lower overall engraftment of donor microbiota. Furthermore, differences in the taxonomic composition of the donors and the engraftment of certain taxa were associated with clinical response. Conclusion In this small study, pretreatment with budesonide did not significantly influence engraftment or clinical response after FMT. However, clinical response appeared donor-dependent. Response to FMT may be related to transfer of specific strains instead of overall engraftment, demonstrating the need to characterize mechanisms of actions of strains that maximize therapeutic benefit in ulcerative colitis.","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) shows some efficacy in treating patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), although variability has been observed among donors and treatment regimens. We investigated the effect of FMT using rationally selected donors after pretreatment with budesonide or placebo in active UC. Methods Patients ≥ 18 years old with mild to moderate active UC were randomly assigned to three weeks budesonide (9 mg) or placebo followed by four weekly infusions of a donor feces suspension. Two donors were selected based on microbiota composition, Treg induction and SCFA production in mice. The primary endpoint was engraftment of donor microbiota after FMT. In addition, clinical efficacy was assessed. Results In total, 24 patients were enrolled. Pretreatment with budesonide did not increase donor microbiota engraftment (p=0.56) nor clinical response, and engraftment was not associated with clinical response. At week 14, 10/24 (42%) of patients achieved (partial) remission. Remarkably, patients treated with FMT suspensions from one donor were associated with clinical response (80% of responders, p<0.05) but had lower overall engraftment of donor microbiota. Furthermore, differences in the taxonomic composition of the donors and the engraftment of certain taxa were associated with clinical response. Conclusion In this small study, pretreatment with budesonide did not significantly influence engraftment or clinical response after FMT. However, clinical response appeared donor-dependent. Response to FMT may be related to transfer of specific strains instead of overall engraftment, demonstrating the need to characterize mechanisms of actions of strains that maximize therapeutic benefit in ulcerative colitis.
使用预选供体对活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者进行布地奈德或安慰剂治疗后的粪便微生物群移植:一项随机试点研究
背景 粪便微生物群移植(FMT)对治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者有一定疗效,但不同供体和治疗方案之间存在差异。我们研究了在对活动性 UC 进行布地奈德或安慰剂预处理后,使用合理选择的供体进行 FMT 的效果。方法 将年龄≥ 18 岁的轻中度活动性 UC 患者随机分配到布地奈德(9 毫克)或安慰剂治疗三周,然后每周输注四次供体粪便悬液。根据小鼠体内的微生物群组成、Treg诱导和SCFA产生情况选择了两名供体。主要终点是 FMT 后供体微生物群的移植。此外,还对临床疗效进行了评估。结果 共有24名患者入组。布地奈德的预处理并不能提高供体微生物群的接种率(p=0.56)或临床反应,而且接种率与临床反应无关。第 14 周时,10/24(42%)名患者获得了(部分)缓解。值得注意的是,使用来自一个供体的 FMT 悬浮液治疗的患者与临床应答相关(80% 的应答者,p<0.05),但供体微生物群的总体移植率较低。此外,供体分类组成的差异和某些分类群的移植也与临床反应有关。结论 在这项小型研究中,布地奈德预处理对 FMT 后的移植或临床反应没有显著影响。然而,临床反应似乎取决于供体。对 FMT 的反应可能与特定菌株的移植有关,而不是与整体的移植有关,这表明有必要确定能使溃疡性结肠炎治疗效果最大化的菌株的作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信