Statistical Complexity of Quantum Learning

Leonardo Banchi, Jason Luke Pereira, Sharu Theresa Jose, Osvaldo Simeone
{"title":"Statistical Complexity of Quantum Learning","authors":"Leonardo Banchi, Jason Luke Pereira, Sharu Theresa Jose, Osvaldo Simeone","doi":"10.1002/qute.202300311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning problems involve settings in which an algorithm has to make decisions based on data, and possibly side information such as expert knowledge. This study has two main goals. First, it reviews and generalizes different results on the data and model complexity of quantum learning, where the data and/or the algorithm can be quantum, focusing on information‐theoretic techniques. Second, it introduces the notion of copy complexity, which quantifies the number of copies of a quantum state required to achieve a target accuracy level. Copy complexity arises from the destructive nature of quantum measurements, which irreversibly alter the state to be processed, limiting the information that can be extracted about quantum data. As a result, empirical risk minimization is generally inapplicable. The paper presents novel results on the copy complexity for both training and testing. To make the paper self‐contained and approachable by different research communities, an extensive background material is provided on classical results from statistical learning theory, as well as on the distinguishability of quantum states. Throughout, the differences between quantum and classical learning are highlighted by addressing both supervised and unsupervised learning, and extensive pointers are provided to the literature.","PeriodicalId":501028,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Quantum Technologies","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Quantum Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202300311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning problems involve settings in which an algorithm has to make decisions based on data, and possibly side information such as expert knowledge. This study has two main goals. First, it reviews and generalizes different results on the data and model complexity of quantum learning, where the data and/or the algorithm can be quantum, focusing on information‐theoretic techniques. Second, it introduces the notion of copy complexity, which quantifies the number of copies of a quantum state required to achieve a target accuracy level. Copy complexity arises from the destructive nature of quantum measurements, which irreversibly alter the state to be processed, limiting the information that can be extracted about quantum data. As a result, empirical risk minimization is generally inapplicable. The paper presents novel results on the copy complexity for both training and testing. To make the paper self‐contained and approachable by different research communities, an extensive background material is provided on classical results from statistical learning theory, as well as on the distinguishability of quantum states. Throughout, the differences between quantum and classical learning are highlighted by addressing both supervised and unsupervised learning, and extensive pointers are provided to the literature.
量子学习的统计复杂性
学习问题涉及算法必须根据数据以及可能的辅助信息(如专家知识)做出决策的设置。这项研究有两个主要目标。首先,它回顾并归纳了关于量子学习的数据和模型复杂性的不同结果,其中数据和/或算法可以是量子的,重点是信息论技术。其次,它引入了拷贝复杂度的概念,即量化达到目标精度水平所需的量子态拷贝数量。拷贝复杂性源于量子测量的破坏性,量子测量会不可逆地改变要处理的状态,从而限制了可以提取的量子数据信息。因此,经验风险最小化通常并不适用。本文提出了训练和测试副本复杂度的新结果。为了使本文自成一体,并能为不同研究领域所用,本文提供了大量背景材料,介绍了统计学习理论的经典结果以及量子态的可区分性。通过探讨监督学习和无监督学习,本文突出了量子学习与经典学习之间的差异,并提供了大量文献索引。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信