Governance mediation in the era of disruptive technologies: unveiling new perspectives on the risk of material misstatements

IF 3.3 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Marwa Elnahass, Xinrui Jia, Louise Crawford
{"title":"Governance mediation in the era of disruptive technologies: unveiling new perspectives on the risk of material misstatements","authors":"Marwa Elnahass, Xinrui Jia, Louise Crawford","doi":"10.1108/jfra-11-2023-0643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to examine the mediating effects of corporate governance mechanisms like the board of directors on the association between disruptive technology adoption by audit clients and the risk of material misstatements, including inherent risk and control risk. In particular, the authors study the mediating effects of board characteristics such as board size, independence and gender diversity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Based on a sample of 100 audit clients listed on the FTSE 100 from 2015 to 2021, this study uses structural equation modelling to test the research objectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings indicate a significant and negative association between disruptive technology adoption by audit clients and inherent risk. However, there is no significant evidence observed for control risk. The utilisation of disruptive technology by the audit client has a significant impact on the board characteristics, resulting in an increase in board size, greater independence and gender diversity. The authors also find strong evidence that board independence mediates the association between disruptive technology usage and both inherent risk and control risk. In addition, board size and gender exhibit distinct and differential mediating effects on the association and across the two types of risks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study reveals that the significant role of using disruptive technology by audit clients in reducing the risk of material misstatements is closely associated with the board of directors, which makes audit clients place greater emphasis on the construction of effective corporate governance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study offers essential primary evidence that can assist policymakers and standard setters in formulating guidance and recommendations for board size, independence and gender quotas, ensuring the enhancement of effective governance and supporting the future of audit within the next generation of digital services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>With respect to relevant stakeholders, it is imperative for audit clients to recognise that corporate governance represents a fundamental means of addressing the ramifications of applying disruptive technology, particularly as they pertain to inherent and control risks within the audit client.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes to the existing literature by investigating the joint impact of corporate governance and the utilisation of disruptive technology by audit clients on inherent risk and control risk, which has not been investigated by previous research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":15826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-11-2023-0643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the mediating effects of corporate governance mechanisms like the board of directors on the association between disruptive technology adoption by audit clients and the risk of material misstatements, including inherent risk and control risk. In particular, the authors study the mediating effects of board characteristics such as board size, independence and gender diversity.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on a sample of 100 audit clients listed on the FTSE 100 from 2015 to 2021, this study uses structural equation modelling to test the research objectives.

Findings

The findings indicate a significant and negative association between disruptive technology adoption by audit clients and inherent risk. However, there is no significant evidence observed for control risk. The utilisation of disruptive technology by the audit client has a significant impact on the board characteristics, resulting in an increase in board size, greater independence and gender diversity. The authors also find strong evidence that board independence mediates the association between disruptive technology usage and both inherent risk and control risk. In addition, board size and gender exhibit distinct and differential mediating effects on the association and across the two types of risks.

Research limitations/implications

The study reveals that the significant role of using disruptive technology by audit clients in reducing the risk of material misstatements is closely associated with the board of directors, which makes audit clients place greater emphasis on the construction of effective corporate governance.

Practical implications

This study offers essential primary evidence that can assist policymakers and standard setters in formulating guidance and recommendations for board size, independence and gender quotas, ensuring the enhancement of effective governance and supporting the future of audit within the next generation of digital services.

Social implications

With respect to relevant stakeholders, it is imperative for audit clients to recognise that corporate governance represents a fundamental means of addressing the ramifications of applying disruptive technology, particularly as they pertain to inherent and control risks within the audit client.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the existing literature by investigating the joint impact of corporate governance and the utilisation of disruptive technology by audit clients on inherent risk and control risk, which has not been investigated by previous research.

颠覆性技术时代的治理调解:揭示重大错报风险的新视角
目的本研究旨在考察董事会等公司治理机制对审计客户采用颠覆性技术与重大错报风险(包括固有风险和控制风险)之间关联的中介效应。作者特别研究了董事会规模、独立性和性别多样性等董事会特征的中介效应。设计/方法/途径本研究以 2015 年至 2021 年期间富时 100 指数上市的 100 家审计客户为样本,采用结构方程模型检验研究目标。但是,在控制风险方面没有观察到明显的证据。审计客户采用颠覆性技术对董事会的特征有重大影响,导致董事会规模扩大、独立性增强和性别多元化。作者还发现强有力的证据表明,董事会的独立性在颠覆性技术的使用与固有风险和控制风险之间起到了中介作用。此外,董事会规模和性别在两类风险的关联性上表现出不同的中介效应。研究局限/启示本研究揭示了审计客户使用颠覆性技术在降低重大错报风险方面的重要作用与董事会密切相关,这使得审计客户更加重视构建有效的公司治理。实践意义本研究提供了重要的原始证据,有助于政策制定者和标准制定者为董事会规模、独立性和性别配额制定指导和建议,确保加强有效治理,支持下一代数字服务中审计的未来发展。社会影响对于相关利益方而言,审计客户必须认识到,公司治理是解决应用颠覆性技术的后果的基本手段,尤其是与审计客户内部的固有风险和控制风险相关的后果。 原创性/价值本研究通过调查公司治理和审计客户利用颠覆性技术对固有风险和控制风险的共同影响,为现有文献做出了贡献,以往的研究尚未对此进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信