Computational thinking for the digital age: a systematic review of tools, pedagogical strategies, and assessment practices

Toluchuri Shalini Shanker Rao, Kaushal Kumar Bhagat
{"title":"Computational thinking for the digital age: a systematic review of tools, pedagogical strategies, and assessment practices","authors":"Toluchuri Shalini Shanker Rao, Kaushal Kumar Bhagat","doi":"10.1007/s11423-024-10364-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Computational thinking (CT) has received growing interest as a research subject in the last decade, with research contributions attempting to capitalize on the benefits that CT may provide. This study included a systematic analysis aimed at revealing current trends in the CT subject, identifying educational interventions, and emerging assessment instruments. It also gave an overview of how teachers learned CT skills and how they integrated the CT curriculum into classroom practices. We searched the data in the Web of Science database and identified 360 articles. Most importantly, it emphasized the following points: (a) the most popular subject areas in CT literature; (b) CT intervention tools; (c) CT assessment practices used so far within educational courses; and (d) effective CT approaches to influence pre-service teachers. Results from this review revealed that CT’s promotion in education had achieved significant progress in recent years. Along with the growth in the number of CT studies, the number of subjects, research questions, and teaching approaches also increased in recent years. It was also found that CT was mostly used in science, mathematics, programming, and computer science tasks, with little work in artificial intelligence (AI) and non-STEM areas. The essence of this paper implicated the researchers in designing the curriculum based on different subject domains. Furthermore, we recommended integrating augmented reality-based games using CT methodologies into the curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":501584,"journal":{"name":"Educational Technology Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Technology Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10364-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) has received growing interest as a research subject in the last decade, with research contributions attempting to capitalize on the benefits that CT may provide. This study included a systematic analysis aimed at revealing current trends in the CT subject, identifying educational interventions, and emerging assessment instruments. It also gave an overview of how teachers learned CT skills and how they integrated the CT curriculum into classroom practices. We searched the data in the Web of Science database and identified 360 articles. Most importantly, it emphasized the following points: (a) the most popular subject areas in CT literature; (b) CT intervention tools; (c) CT assessment practices used so far within educational courses; and (d) effective CT approaches to influence pre-service teachers. Results from this review revealed that CT’s promotion in education had achieved significant progress in recent years. Along with the growth in the number of CT studies, the number of subjects, research questions, and teaching approaches also increased in recent years. It was also found that CT was mostly used in science, mathematics, programming, and computer science tasks, with little work in artificial intelligence (AI) and non-STEM areas. The essence of this paper implicated the researchers in designing the curriculum based on different subject domains. Furthermore, we recommended integrating augmented reality-based games using CT methodologies into the curriculum.

Abstract Image

数字时代的计算思维:工具、教学策略和评估实践的系统回顾
在过去的十年中,计算思维(CT)作为一个研究课题受到了越来越多的关注,研究人员试图利用计算思维可能带来的益处。本研究进行了系统分析,旨在揭示计算思维学科的当前趋势,确定教育干预措施和新出现的评估工具。研究还概述了教师如何学习 CT 技能以及如何将 CT 课程融入课堂实践。我们在 "科学网 "数据库中搜索了相关数据,并确定了 360 篇文章。最重要的是,它强调了以下几点:(a) CT 文献中最受欢迎的学科领域;(b) CT 干预工具;(c) 迄今为止在教育课程中使用的 CT 评估实践;以及 (d) 影响职前教师的有效 CT 方法。审查结果表明,近年来 CT 在教育领域的推广取得了重大进展。随着 CT 研究数量的增长,近年来 CT 研究的主题、研究问题和教学方法也在增加。研究还发现,CT 主要用于科学、数学、编程和计算机科学任务,在人工智能(AI)和非 STEM 领域开展的工作很少。本文的精髓在于让研究人员根据不同学科领域设计课程。此外,我们还建议将基于增强现实的游戏与 CT 方法整合到课程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信