Assessment of heavy metal and metalloid concentrations at Horicon National Wildlife Refuge

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sarah M. Woody, Sadie O’Dell, Jon Krapfl, Sarah E. Warner, M. Elsbeth McPhee
{"title":"Assessment of heavy metal and metalloid concentrations at Horicon National Wildlife Refuge","authors":"Sarah M. Woody, Sadie O’Dell, Jon Krapfl, Sarah E. Warner, M. Elsbeth McPhee","doi":"10.1007/s11273-024-09987-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anthropogenic inputs of heavy metals and metalloids pose a risk to wetlands due to their long retention time in sediment, high toxicity at low concentrations, and biological accumulation. This study aimed to assess risk from seven heavy metals (cadmium:Cd, chromium:Cr, copper:Cu, mercury:Hg, nickel:Ni, lead:Pb, zinc:Zn) and one metalloid (arsenic:As) along a trophic pathway by quantifying contaminant loads in muskrat livers, roots of invasive hybrid cattail (<i>Typha x glauca</i>), and in sediment at Horicon National Wildlife Refuge, a wetland of international importance in southeastern Wisconsin, United States. Overall, comparison to literature and thresholds from the Environmental Protection Agency led us to conclude that heavy metals and metalloids pose a low risk to refuge biota with maximum concentrations as follows in sediment, <i>T. x glauca</i> roots, and muskrat livers in mg/kg dry weight: Zn—82, 54, 111, Pb—42, 43, 0.06, Cu—26, 59, 13, Ni—22, 5, 0.7, Cr—20, 3, 0.5, As—6, 11, 0.08, Cd—3, 1, 0.08, Hg—0.1, 0.02, 0.08, a finding which was further supported by low bioconcentration factors between sample types. A spatial analysis using GIS revealed hotspots for Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn in sediment in one subplot. However, even in hotspots concentrations mostly fell below protective thresholds and were similar to or lower than concentrations found in a prior survey from 1990 (α &lt; 0.05). Overall, while anthropogenic influences are undoubtedly present, we interpret the concentrations found here to be relatively low and present them as points of comparison regarding risk to plants and mammals for others conducting similar surveys on wetlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-024-09987-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic inputs of heavy metals and metalloids pose a risk to wetlands due to their long retention time in sediment, high toxicity at low concentrations, and biological accumulation. This study aimed to assess risk from seven heavy metals (cadmium:Cd, chromium:Cr, copper:Cu, mercury:Hg, nickel:Ni, lead:Pb, zinc:Zn) and one metalloid (arsenic:As) along a trophic pathway by quantifying contaminant loads in muskrat livers, roots of invasive hybrid cattail (Typha x glauca), and in sediment at Horicon National Wildlife Refuge, a wetland of international importance in southeastern Wisconsin, United States. Overall, comparison to literature and thresholds from the Environmental Protection Agency led us to conclude that heavy metals and metalloids pose a low risk to refuge biota with maximum concentrations as follows in sediment, T. x glauca roots, and muskrat livers in mg/kg dry weight: Zn—82, 54, 111, Pb—42, 43, 0.06, Cu—26, 59, 13, Ni—22, 5, 0.7, Cr—20, 3, 0.5, As—6, 11, 0.08, Cd—3, 1, 0.08, Hg—0.1, 0.02, 0.08, a finding which was further supported by low bioconcentration factors between sample types. A spatial analysis using GIS revealed hotspots for Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn in sediment in one subplot. However, even in hotspots concentrations mostly fell below protective thresholds and were similar to or lower than concentrations found in a prior survey from 1990 (α < 0.05). Overall, while anthropogenic influences are undoubtedly present, we interpret the concentrations found here to be relatively low and present them as points of comparison regarding risk to plants and mammals for others conducting similar surveys on wetlands.

霍里孔国家野生动物保护区重金属和类金属浓度评估
由于重金属和类金属在沉积物中的滞留时间长、低浓度时毒性高以及生物累积,人为输入的重金属和类金属对湿地构成风险。本研究旨在通过量化麝鼠肝脏、入侵杂交香蒲(Typha x glauca)根部以及美国威斯康星州东南部具有国际重要性的湿地霍里孔国家野生动物保护区沉积物中的污染物负荷,评估七种重金属(镉:Cd、铬:Cr、铜:Cu、汞:Hg、镍:Ni、铅:Pb、锌:Zn)和一种类金属(砷:As)在营养途径中的风险。x glauca 根部和麝鼠肝脏中的最大浓度如下(以毫克/千克干重为单位):锌-82,54,111;铅-42,43,0.06;铜-26,59,13;镍-22,5,0.7;铬-20,3,0.5;砷-6,11,0.08;镉-3,1,0.08;汞-0.1,0.02,0.08。利用地理信息系统(GIS)进行的空间分析表明,在一个子图层中,沉积物中的镉、铬、铜、镍和锌都是热点。不过,即使在热点地区,浓度也大多低于保护阈值,与 1990 年之前调查发现的浓度相似或更低(α < 0.05)。总体而言,虽然人为影响无疑是存在的,但我们认为此处发现的浓度相对较低,并将其作为植物和哺乳动物风险的比较点,供其他进行类似湿地调查的人员参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信