Preoperative spinal education for lumbar spinal stenosis: A feasibility study

Pm & R Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13140
James E. Eubanks, Zachary A. Cupler, Jordan A. Gliedt, Geronimo Bejarano, Richard L. Skolasky, Rob J. E. M. Smeets, Michael J. Schneider
{"title":"Preoperative spinal education for lumbar spinal stenosis: A feasibility study","authors":"James E. Eubanks, Zachary A. Cupler, Jordan A. Gliedt, Geronimo Bejarano, Richard L. Skolasky, Rob J. E. M. Smeets, Michael J. Schneider","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain among older adults. A common and costly intervention for the treatment of LSS is lumbar decompression with or without fusion (LSS surgery), which has mixed outcomes among patients. Prehabilitation is a strategy designed to optimize the consistency of positive surgical outcomes and promote patient self‐efficacy, while attempting to mitigate postoperative complications. No efforts have investigated the prehabilitation strategies specifically for patients undergoing LSS surgery.ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of delivery and acceptability by participants of a novel prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing LSS surgery.DesignFeasibility study.SettingOutpatient orthopedic clinic at an academic medical center.ParticipantsPatients at least 50 years of age, who were scheduled for LSS surgery between October 2020 and October 2021.InterventionPreOperative Spinal Education for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (POSE‐LSS), is a novel multimodal, education‐focused, time‐efficient prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Participants received the following: (1) Educational booklet and video; (2) In‐person physical therapy (PT) session; and (3) Telemedicine visit with a physiatrist.Main Outcome Measure(s)The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility and acceptability of intervention by participants. Key potential surgical outcomes were length of stay and discharge disposition.ResultsPOSE‐LSS was completed by all eligible participants enrolled (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15) indicating feasibility and acceptability. Potential effectiveness measures including length of stay and discharge disposition were positively associated with the POSE‐LSS intervention.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that a novel prehabilitation intervention is feasible, acceptable, and appears positively associated with important short‐term measures of postoperative recovery that may impact the trajectory of patient care following LSS surgery.","PeriodicalId":20287,"journal":{"name":"Pm & R","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pm & R","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain among older adults. A common and costly intervention for the treatment of LSS is lumbar decompression with or without fusion (LSS surgery), which has mixed outcomes among patients. Prehabilitation is a strategy designed to optimize the consistency of positive surgical outcomes and promote patient self‐efficacy, while attempting to mitigate postoperative complications. No efforts have investigated the prehabilitation strategies specifically for patients undergoing LSS surgery.ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of delivery and acceptability by participants of a novel prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing LSS surgery.DesignFeasibility study.SettingOutpatient orthopedic clinic at an academic medical center.ParticipantsPatients at least 50 years of age, who were scheduled for LSS surgery between October 2020 and October 2021.InterventionPreOperative Spinal Education for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (POSE‐LSS), is a novel multimodal, education‐focused, time‐efficient prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Participants received the following: (1) Educational booklet and video; (2) In‐person physical therapy (PT) session; and (3) Telemedicine visit with a physiatrist.Main Outcome Measure(s)The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility and acceptability of intervention by participants. Key potential surgical outcomes were length of stay and discharge disposition.ResultsPOSE‐LSS was completed by all eligible participants enrolled (n = 15) indicating feasibility and acceptability. Potential effectiveness measures including length of stay and discharge disposition were positively associated with the POSE‐LSS intervention.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that a novel prehabilitation intervention is feasible, acceptable, and appears positively associated with important short‐term measures of postoperative recovery that may impact the trajectory of patient care following LSS surgery.
腰椎管狭窄症的术前脊柱教育:可行性研究
导言腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是导致老年人慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的主要原因。治疗腰椎管狭窄症的一种常见且昂贵的干预措施是腰椎减压加或不加融合术(腰椎管狭窄症手术),但患者的治疗效果参差不齐。术前康复是一种策略,旨在优化手术疗效的一致性,提高患者的自我效能,同时减少术后并发症。目标确定为接受 LSS 手术的患者提供新型康复干预的可行性以及参与者的接受程度。干预腰椎管狭窄症术前脊柱教育(POSE-LSS)是一项针对腰椎管狭窄症手术患者的新型多模式、以教育为重点、省时的术前康复计划。参与者将获得以下内容:(1) 教育手册和视频;(2) 亲临现场的物理治疗 (PT) 课程;(3) 物理治疗师的远程医疗访问。结果所有符合条件的参与者(n = 15)均完成了POSE-LSS,这表明干预措施具有可行性和可接受性。包括住院时间和出院处置在内的潜在效果指标与 POSE-LSS 干预呈正相关。结论这项研究表明,一种新型的术前康复干预是可行的、可接受的,并且似乎与术后恢复的重要短期指标呈正相关,这可能会影响 LSS 手术后患者护理的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信