The causal relationship between anxiety and tinnitus severity: a Mendelian randomization study

IF 1.2 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Lili Yang, Yueming Ding
{"title":"The causal relationship between anxiety and tinnitus severity: a Mendelian randomization study","authors":"Lili Yang, Yueming Ding","doi":"10.1186/s43042-024-00520-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The link between anxiety and tinnitus severity has garnered significant scholarly interest, with numerous studies identifying a positive correlation. Despite this, the genetic basis of this relationship remains underexplored. Leveraging publicly accessible GWAS data, this study employs Mendelian randomization to elucidate the genetic causality between anxiety and tinnitus severity. This research analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to anxiety and tinnitus severity from the UK Biobank, utilizing aggregated data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Instrumental variables linked to anxiety were meticulously selected. The study implemented several Mendelian randomization techniques, including “mr_ivw,” “mr_egger_regression,” “mr_weighted_median,” “mr_simple_mode,” and “mr_weighted_mode,” to assess the causal impact of anxiety on tinnitus risk through odds ratios (ORs). Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger and the leave-one-out method, were conducted to ensure result stability. The F-value was also calculated to ascertain the strength of the instrumental variables. Analysis identified five SNPs as instrumental variables. The calculated ORs and 95% confidence intervals from MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and inverse variance weighting showed no statistically significant causal relationship between anxiety and severe tinnitus, with all P-values exceeding 0.05. This lack of statistical significance, consistent across various methods, indicates no genetic causality between anxiety and tinnitus severity. Furthermore, no evidence of heterogeneity (P = 0.80) or horizontal pleiotropy (P = 0.31) was found, reinforcing the robustness of the instrumental variables (F > 10). Our Mendelian randomization analysis reveals no genetic causality between anxiety and tinnitus severity, suggesting the need for further research into the multifaceted etiology of tinnitus. ","PeriodicalId":39112,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00520-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The link between anxiety and tinnitus severity has garnered significant scholarly interest, with numerous studies identifying a positive correlation. Despite this, the genetic basis of this relationship remains underexplored. Leveraging publicly accessible GWAS data, this study employs Mendelian randomization to elucidate the genetic causality between anxiety and tinnitus severity. This research analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to anxiety and tinnitus severity from the UK Biobank, utilizing aggregated data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Instrumental variables linked to anxiety were meticulously selected. The study implemented several Mendelian randomization techniques, including “mr_ivw,” “mr_egger_regression,” “mr_weighted_median,” “mr_simple_mode,” and “mr_weighted_mode,” to assess the causal impact of anxiety on tinnitus risk through odds ratios (ORs). Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger and the leave-one-out method, were conducted to ensure result stability. The F-value was also calculated to ascertain the strength of the instrumental variables. Analysis identified five SNPs as instrumental variables. The calculated ORs and 95% confidence intervals from MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and inverse variance weighting showed no statistically significant causal relationship between anxiety and severe tinnitus, with all P-values exceeding 0.05. This lack of statistical significance, consistent across various methods, indicates no genetic causality between anxiety and tinnitus severity. Furthermore, no evidence of heterogeneity (P = 0.80) or horizontal pleiotropy (P = 0.31) was found, reinforcing the robustness of the instrumental variables (F > 10). Our Mendelian randomization analysis reveals no genetic causality between anxiety and tinnitus severity, suggesting the need for further research into the multifaceted etiology of tinnitus.
焦虑与耳鸣严重程度之间的因果关系:孟德尔随机研究
焦虑与耳鸣严重程度之间的关系引起了学者们的极大兴趣,许多研究都发现两者之间存在正相关关系。尽管如此,这种关系的遗传基础仍未得到充分探索。本研究利用公开的 GWAS 数据,采用孟德尔随机法来阐明焦虑与耳鸣严重程度之间的遗传因果关系。本研究利用全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总数据,分析了英国生物库中与焦虑和耳鸣严重程度相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)。与焦虑相关的工具变量均经过精心筛选。研究采用了多种孟德尔随机化技术,包括 "mr_ivw"、"mr_egger_regression"、"mr_weighted_median"、"mr_simple_mode "和 "mr_weighted_mode",通过几率比(ORs)评估焦虑对耳鸣风险的因果影响。为确保结果的稳定性,还进行了敏感性分析,包括 MR-Egger 分析和撇除法分析。还计算了 F 值,以确定工具变量的强度。分析确定了五个 SNP 为工具变量。通过MR-Egger回归、加权中位数和反方差加权计算得出的ORs和95%置信区间显示,焦虑与严重耳鸣之间没有统计学意义上的因果关系,所有P值均超过0.05。在各种方法中均无统计学意义,这表明焦虑与耳鸣严重程度之间不存在遗传因果关系。此外,没有发现异质性(P = 0.80)或水平多效性(P = 0.31)的证据,这加强了工具变量(F > 10)的稳健性。我们的孟德尔随机分析表明,焦虑与耳鸣严重程度之间没有遗传因果关系,这表明有必要进一步研究耳鸣的多方面病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics Medicine-Genetics (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信