Endoscopic-assisted repair of combined ventral hernias and diastasis recti: minimizing seroma incidence by quilting

Jean-Pierre Cossa, Philippe Ngo, Dominique Blum, Edouard Pélissier, Jean-François Gillion
{"title":"Endoscopic-assisted repair of combined ventral hernias and diastasis recti: minimizing seroma incidence by quilting","authors":"Jean-Pierre Cossa, Philippe Ngo, Dominique Blum, Edouard Pélissier, Jean-François Gillion","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10801-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>To reduce the incidence of seromas, we have adapted the quilting procedure used in open abdominoplasty to the endoscopic-assisted repair of concomitant ventral hernia (VH) and diastasis recti (DR). The aim of this study was to describe the technique and assess its efficacy by comparing two groups of patients operated on with the same repair technique before and after introducing the quilting.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included data prospectively registered in the French Club Hernie database from 176 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for concomitant VH and DR via the double-layer suturing technique. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group 1 comprised 102 patients operated before introducing the quilting procedure and Group 2 comprised 74 operated after introducing the quilting. To carry out comparisons between groups, seromas were classified into two types: type A included spontaneously resorbable seromas and seromas drained by a single puncture and type B included seromas requiring two or more punctures and complicated cases requiring reoperation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The global percentage of seromas was 24.4%. The percentage of seromas of any type was greater in Group 1 (27.5%) than in Group 2 (20.3%). The percentage of Type B seromas was greater in Group 1 (19.6%) than in Group 2 (5.4%), when the percentage of Type A seromas was greater in Group 2 (14.9) than in Group 1 (7.9%). Differences were significant (<i>p</i> = 0.014). The operation duration was longer in Group 2 (83.9 min) than in Group 1 (69.9 min). Four complications requiring reoperation were observed in Group 1: three persistent seromas requiring surgical drainage under general anesthesia and one encapsulated seroma.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Adapting the quilting technique to the endoscopic-assisted bilayer suturing technique for combined VH and DR repair can significantly reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative seromas.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10801-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To reduce the incidence of seromas, we have adapted the quilting procedure used in open abdominoplasty to the endoscopic-assisted repair of concomitant ventral hernia (VH) and diastasis recti (DR). The aim of this study was to describe the technique and assess its efficacy by comparing two groups of patients operated on with the same repair technique before and after introducing the quilting.

Methods

This retrospective study included data prospectively registered in the French Club Hernie database from 176 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for concomitant VH and DR via the double-layer suturing technique. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group 1 comprised 102 patients operated before introducing the quilting procedure and Group 2 comprised 74 operated after introducing the quilting. To carry out comparisons between groups, seromas were classified into two types: type A included spontaneously resorbable seromas and seromas drained by a single puncture and type B included seromas requiring two or more punctures and complicated cases requiring reoperation.

Results

The global percentage of seromas was 24.4%. The percentage of seromas of any type was greater in Group 1 (27.5%) than in Group 2 (20.3%). The percentage of Type B seromas was greater in Group 1 (19.6%) than in Group 2 (5.4%), when the percentage of Type A seromas was greater in Group 2 (14.9) than in Group 1 (7.9%). Differences were significant (p = 0.014). The operation duration was longer in Group 2 (83.9 min) than in Group 1 (69.9 min). Four complications requiring reoperation were observed in Group 1: three persistent seromas requiring surgical drainage under general anesthesia and one encapsulated seroma.

Conclusion

Adapting the quilting technique to the endoscopic-assisted bilayer suturing technique for combined VH and DR repair can significantly reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative seromas.

Abstract Image

内窥镜辅助修复腹股沟疝和直肠膨出:通过绗缝将血清肿发生率降至最低
背景为了降低血清瘤的发生率,我们将开腹手术中使用的绗缝法应用于内窥镜辅助修复腹股沟疝(VH)和直肠膨出(DR)。这项回顾性研究纳入了法国疝俱乐部(French Club Hernie)数据库中的前瞻性登记数据,这些数据来自 176 名通过双层缝合技术同时接受腹股沟疝和直肠膨出手术的连续患者。患者被分为两组:第一组包括 102 名在引入绗缝程序前接受手术的患者,第二组包括 74 名在引入绗缝程序后接受手术的患者。为了进行组间比较,血清瘤被分为两类:A 类包括可自行吸收的血清瘤和通过单次穿刺引流的血清瘤,B 类包括需要两次或多次穿刺的血清瘤和需要再次手术的复杂病例。第 1 组(27.5%)中任何类型血清肿的比例均高于第 2 组(20.3%)。第一组 B 型血清瘤的比例(19.6%)高于第二组(5.4%),而第二组 A 型血清瘤的比例(14.9%)高于第一组(7.9%)。差异显著(P = 0.014)。第二组的手术时间(83.9 分钟)长于第一组(69.9 分钟)。结论在内窥镜辅助双层缝合技术中应用绗缝技术进行 VH 和 DR 联合修复,可显著降低术后血清肿的发生率和严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信