Adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy’s effectiveness in treating a sample of patients with major depressive disorder refractory to first-line drug treatment

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alireza Haji Seyed Javadi, Abdul Rasool Mohammadian, Ali Akbar Shafikhani
{"title":"Adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy’s effectiveness in treating a sample of patients with major depressive disorder refractory to first-line drug treatment","authors":"Alireza Haji Seyed Javadi, Abdul Rasool Mohammadian, Ali Akbar Shafikhani","doi":"10.1186/s43045-024-00418-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The usefulness of repetitious transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and its protocols in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS in treating a sample of patients with MDD who did not respond to conventional treatment. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores for the active rTMS group were 19.66 ± 6.70 at baseline, 12.50 ± 6.69 at 2 weeks, and 11.23 ± 6.59 at 4 weeks. The average HDRS scores for the sham rTMS group were 20.03 ± 7.40 at baseline, 19.36 ± 6.86 at 2 weeks, and 18.53 ± 7.10 at 4 weeks (F = 5.98; p < 0.01). The Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) scores were significantly lower in the second and fourth weeks than the baseline due to the significant interaction between time effects and the groups (F = 9.95, p = 0.002). This condition was also similar to the CGI-Improvement Scale and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ), and the intervention group showed a significantly lower score than the control group (p < 0.05). This study showed that rTMS using the employed protocol was promising for patients with MDD resistant to first-line drug therapy. Further studies are required to ensure our observation. Trial registration number: IRCT20190612043877N1 Trial registry Record URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/63919 ","PeriodicalId":38653,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Current Psychiatry","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Current Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-024-00418-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The usefulness of repetitious transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and its protocols in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS in treating a sample of patients with MDD who did not respond to conventional treatment. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores for the active rTMS group were 19.66 ± 6.70 at baseline, 12.50 ± 6.69 at 2 weeks, and 11.23 ± 6.59 at 4 weeks. The average HDRS scores for the sham rTMS group were 20.03 ± 7.40 at baseline, 19.36 ± 6.86 at 2 weeks, and 18.53 ± 7.10 at 4 weeks (F = 5.98; p < 0.01). The Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) scores were significantly lower in the second and fourth weeks than the baseline due to the significant interaction between time effects and the groups (F = 9.95, p = 0.002). This condition was also similar to the CGI-Improvement Scale and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ), and the intervention group showed a significantly lower score than the control group (p < 0.05). This study showed that rTMS using the employed protocol was promising for patients with MDD resistant to first-line drug therapy. Further studies are required to ensure our observation. Trial registration number: IRCT20190612043877N1 Trial registry Record URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/63919
辅助性重复经颅磁刺激疗法对一线药物治疗难治性重度抑郁症患者的治疗效果
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)及其方案在治疗重度抑郁障碍(MDD)中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估经颅磁刺激治疗对常规治疗无效的重度抑郁症患者的疗效。积极经颅磁刺激治疗组的汉密尔顿抑郁评分量表(HDRS)基线分数为(19.66 ± 6.70),2周时为(12.50 ± 6.69),4周时为(11.23 ± 6.59)。假rTMS组的平均HDRS评分基线为(20.03 ± 7.40),2周时为(19.36 ± 6.86),4周时为(18.53 ± 7.10)(F = 5.98;P < 0.01)。由于时间效应与各组之间存在显著的交互作用(F = 9.95,p = 0.002),第二周和第四周的临床整体印象-严重程度量表(CGI-S)得分明显低于基线。这种情况也与 CGI 改善量表和简明疾病认知问卷(Brief IPQ)相似,干预组的得分明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。这项研究表明,采用经颅磁刺激治疗方案对一线药物治疗耐药的 MDD 患者有很好的疗效。我们还需要进一步的研究来验证我们的观察结果。试验注册号:IRCT20190612043877N1 试验注册记录网址:https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/63919
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Middle East Current Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信