Towards the environment of legitimacy: Do the institutional quality and policy uncertainty matter for the performance of stock markets of South Asian countries?

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Ather Azim Khan, Muhammad Ramzan, Shafaqat Mehmood, Wing-Keung Wong
{"title":"Towards the environment of legitimacy: Do the institutional quality and policy uncertainty matter for the performance of stock markets of South Asian countries?","authors":"Ather Azim Khan, Muhammad Ramzan, Shafaqat Mehmood, Wing-Keung Wong","doi":"10.1108/ijoem-11-2023-1812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper assesses the environment of legitimacy by determining the role of institutional quality and policy uncertainty on the performance of five major South Asian stock markets (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal) using 21 years data from 2000 to 2020. The focus of this study is to approach the issue of the environment of legitimacy that leads to sustained market returns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Panel cointegration tests of Kao and Pedroni are applied, and the Dynamic Panel Vector Autoregressive (PVAR) model is used to determine the estimates.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>ADF <em>P</em>-Values of both Kao and Pedroni tests show that the panels are cointegrated; the statistical significance of the results of the Kao and Pedroni panel cointegration test confirms cointegration among the variables. After determining the most appropriate lag, the analysis is done using PVAR. The results indicate that institutional quality, policy uncertainty, and GDP positively affect stock market return. Meanwhile, government actions and inflation negatively affect stock market returns. On the other hand, stock market return positively affects institutional quality, government action, policy uncertainty, and GDP. While stock market return negatively affects inflation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The sample is taken only from a limited number of South Asian countries, and the period is also limited to 21 years.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Based on our research findings, we have identified several policy implications recommended to enhance and sustain the performance of stock markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper uses a unique analytical tool, which gives a better insight into the problem. The value of this work lies in its findings, which also have practical implications and theoretical significance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-11-2023-1812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper assesses the environment of legitimacy by determining the role of institutional quality and policy uncertainty on the performance of five major South Asian stock markets (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal) using 21 years data from 2000 to 2020. The focus of this study is to approach the issue of the environment of legitimacy that leads to sustained market returns.

Design/methodology/approach

Panel cointegration tests of Kao and Pedroni are applied, and the Dynamic Panel Vector Autoregressive (PVAR) model is used to determine the estimates.

Findings

ADF P-Values of both Kao and Pedroni tests show that the panels are cointegrated; the statistical significance of the results of the Kao and Pedroni panel cointegration test confirms cointegration among the variables. After determining the most appropriate lag, the analysis is done using PVAR. The results indicate that institutional quality, policy uncertainty, and GDP positively affect stock market return. Meanwhile, government actions and inflation negatively affect stock market returns. On the other hand, stock market return positively affects institutional quality, government action, policy uncertainty, and GDP. While stock market return negatively affects inflation.

Research limitations/implications

The sample is taken only from a limited number of South Asian countries, and the period is also limited to 21 years.

Practical implications

Based on our research findings, we have identified several policy implications recommended to enhance and sustain the performance of stock markets.

Originality/value

This paper uses a unique analytical tool, which gives a better insight into the problem. The value of this work lies in its findings, which also have practical implications and theoretical significance.

走向合法性环境:制度质量和政策不确定性对南亚国家股票市场的表现有影响吗?
目的 本文利用 2000 年至 2020 年 21 年的数据,通过确定制度质量和政策不确定性对南亚五大股票市场(印度、巴基斯坦、孟加拉国、斯里兰卡和尼泊尔)表现的作用,对合法性环境进行评估。本研究的重点是探讨导致市场持续回报的合法性环境问题。设计/方法/途径应用 Kao 和 Pedroni 的面板协整检验,并使用动态面板向量自回归(PVAR)模型来确定估计值。研究结果Kao 和 Pedroni 检验的 ADF P 值均表明面板是协整的;Kao 和 Pedroni 面板协整检验结果的统计显著性证实了变量之间的协整性。在确定最合适的滞后期后,使用 PVAR 进行分析。结果表明,制度质量、政策不确定性和 GDP 会对股市收益率产生积极影响。同时,政府行为和通货膨胀对股市回报率有负面影响。另一方面,股市回报率对机构质量、政府行为、政策不确定性和 GDP 有正向影响。研究的局限性/意义样本仅取自有限的几个南亚国家,时间也仅限于 21 年。实践意义基于我们的研究结果,我们提出了几项政策建议,以提高和维持股票市场的表现。这项工作的价值在于其研究结果,同时也具有现实意义和理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
206
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信