Oxygenation management during veno-arterial ECMO support for cardiogenic shock: a multicentric retrospective cohort study

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Hadrien Winiszewski, Thibault Vieille, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot, Nicolas Nesseler, Mael Le Berre, Laure Crognier, Anne-Claude Roche, Jean-Luc Fellahi, Nicolas D’Ostrevy, Zied Ltaief, Juliette Didier, Osama Abou Arab, Simon Meslin, Vincent Scherrer, Guillaume Besch, Alexandra Monnier, Gael Piton, Antoine Kimmoun, Gilles Capellier
{"title":"Oxygenation management during veno-arterial ECMO support for cardiogenic shock: a multicentric retrospective cohort study","authors":"Hadrien Winiszewski, Thibault Vieille, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot, Nicolas Nesseler, Mael Le Berre, Laure Crognier, Anne-Claude Roche, Jean-Luc Fellahi, Nicolas D’Ostrevy, Zied Ltaief, Juliette Didier, Osama Abou Arab, Simon Meslin, Vincent Scherrer, Guillaume Besch, Alexandra Monnier, Gael Piton, Antoine Kimmoun, Gilles Capellier","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01286-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Backgound</h3><p>Hyperoxemia is common and associated with poor outcome during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock. However, little is known about practical daily management of oxygenation. Then, we aim to describe sweep gas oxygen fraction (F<sub>S</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), postoxygenator oxygen partial pressure (P<sub>POST</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), inspired oxygen fraction (F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), and right radial arterial oxygen partial pressure (P<sub>a</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) between day 1 and day 7 of peripheral VA ECMO support. We also aim to evaluate the association between oxygenation parameters and outcome. In this retrospective multicentric study, each participating center had to report data on the last 10 eligible patients for whom the ICU stay was terminated. Patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. Primary endpoint was individual mean F<sub>S</sub>O<sub>2</sub> during the seven first days of ECMO support (F<sub>S</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−7)</i></sub>).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Between August 2019 and March 2022, 139 patients were enrolled in 14 ECMO centers in France, and one in Switzerland. Among them, the median value for F<sub>S</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−7)</i></sub> was 70 [57; 79] % but varied according to center case volume. Compared to high volume centers, centers with less than 30 VA-ECMO runs per year were more likely to maintain F<sub>S</sub>O<sub>2</sub> ≥ 70% (OR 5.04, CI 95% [1.39; 20.4], <i>p</i> = 0.017). Median value for right radial P<sub>a</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−7)</i></sub> was 114 [92; 145] mmHg, and decreased from 125 [86; 207] mmHg at day 1, to 97 [81; 133] mmHg at day 3 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Severe hyperoxemia (i.e. right radial P<sub>a</sub>O<sub>2</sub> ≥ 300 mmHg) occurred in 16 patients (12%). P<sub>POST</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, a surrogate of the lower body oxygenation, was measured in only 39 patients (28%) among four centers. The median value of P<sub>POST</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−7)</i></sub> value was 198 [169; 231] mmHg. By multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.07, CI95% [1.03–1.11], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), F<sub>S</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−3)</i></sub>(OR 1.03 [1.00-1.06], <i>p</i> = 0.039), and right radial P<sub>a</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−3)</i></sub> (OR 1.03, CI95% [1.00-1.02], <i>p</i> = 0.023) were associated with in-ICU mortality.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In a multicentric cohort of cardiogenic shock supported by VA ECMO, the median value for F<sub>S</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−7)</i></sub> was 70 [57; 79] %. P<sub>POST</sub>O<sub>2</sub> monitoring was infrequent and revealed significant hyperoxemia. Higher F<sub>S</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−3)</i></sub> and right radial P<sub>a</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <sub><i>mean (day 1−3)</i></sub> were independently associated with in-ICU mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01286-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgound

Hyperoxemia is common and associated with poor outcome during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock. However, little is known about practical daily management of oxygenation. Then, we aim to describe sweep gas oxygen fraction (FSO2), postoxygenator oxygen partial pressure (PPOSTO2), inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2), and right radial arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) between day 1 and day 7 of peripheral VA ECMO support. We also aim to evaluate the association between oxygenation parameters and outcome. In this retrospective multicentric study, each participating center had to report data on the last 10 eligible patients for whom the ICU stay was terminated. Patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. Primary endpoint was individual mean FSO2 during the seven first days of ECMO support (FSO2 mean (day 1−7)).

Results

Between August 2019 and March 2022, 139 patients were enrolled in 14 ECMO centers in France, and one in Switzerland. Among them, the median value for FSO2 mean (day 1−7) was 70 [57; 79] % but varied according to center case volume. Compared to high volume centers, centers with less than 30 VA-ECMO runs per year were more likely to maintain FSO2 ≥ 70% (OR 5.04, CI 95% [1.39; 20.4], p = 0.017). Median value for right radial PaO2 mean (day 1−7) was 114 [92; 145] mmHg, and decreased from 125 [86; 207] mmHg at day 1, to 97 [81; 133] mmHg at day 3 (p < 0.01). Severe hyperoxemia (i.e. right radial PaO2 ≥ 300 mmHg) occurred in 16 patients (12%). PPOSTO2, a surrogate of the lower body oxygenation, was measured in only 39 patients (28%) among four centers. The median value of PPOSTO2 mean (day 1−7) value was 198 [169; 231] mmHg. By multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.07, CI95% [1.03–1.11], p < 0.001), FSO2 mean (day 1−3)(OR 1.03 [1.00-1.06], p = 0.039), and right radial PaO2 mean (day 1−3) (OR 1.03, CI95% [1.00-1.02], p = 0.023) were associated with in-ICU mortality.

Conclusion

In a multicentric cohort of cardiogenic shock supported by VA ECMO, the median value for FSO2 mean (day 1−7) was 70 [57; 79] %. PPOSTO2 monitoring was infrequent and revealed significant hyperoxemia. Higher FSO2 mean (day 1−3) and right radial PaO2 mean (day 1−3) were independently associated with in-ICU mortality.

Abstract Image

心源性休克静脉-动脉 ECMO 支持期间的氧合管理:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
背景高氧血症很常见,与心源性休克的静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA ECMO)支持期间的不良预后有关。然而,人们对日常实际氧合管理知之甚少。因此,我们旨在描述外周 VA ECMO 支持第 1 天和第 7 天之间的扫气氧分压(FSO2)、氧合器后氧分压(PPOSTO2)、吸入氧分压(FIO2)和右桡动脉氧分压(PaO2)。我们还旨在评估氧合参数与预后之间的关联。在这项多中心回顾性研究中,每个参与研究的中心都必须报告最后 10 名符合条件并终止重症监护病房住院的患者的数据。体外心肺复苏患者除外。结果2019年8月至2022年3月期间,法国的14个ECMO中心和瑞士的1个中心共招募了139名患者。其中,FSO2 平均值(第 1-7 天)的中位数为 70 [57; 79] %,但因中心病例量而异。与大容量中心相比,每年 VA-ECMO 运行次数少于 30 次的中心更有可能将 FSO2 维持在 70% 以上(OR 5.04,CI 95% [1.39; 20.4],P = 0.017)。右侧桡动脉 PaO2 平均值(第 1-7 天)的中值为 114 [92; 145] mmHg,从第 1 天的 125 [86; 207] mmHg 下降到第 3 天的 97 [81; 133] mmHg(p <0.01)。有 16 名患者(12%)出现严重高氧血症(即右侧径向 PaO2 ≥ 300 mmHg)。四个中心仅对 39 名患者(28%)的下半身氧合的替代指标 PPOSTO2 进行了测量。PPOSTO2 平均值(第 1-7 天)的中位数为 198 [169; 231] mmHg。通过多变量分析,年龄(OR 1.07,CI95% [1.03-1.11],p < 0.001)、FSO2 平均值(第 1-3 天)(OR 1.03 [1.00-1.06],p = 0.039)和右侧桡动脉 PaO2 平均值(第 1-3 天)(OR 1.03,CI95% [1.结论在一个由 VA ECMO 支持的多中心心源性休克队列中,FSO2 平均值(第 1-7 天)的中位值为 70 [57; 79]%。PPOSTO2 监测并不频繁,但显示出明显的高氧血症。较高的 FSO2 平均值(第 1-3 天)和右侧径向 PaO2 平均值(第 1-3 天)与重症监护室内死亡率独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信